Kyle wasn't in possession of an assault rifle. You're just victim blaming. Why are you relieving Rosenbaum of any & all culpability? When Rosenbaum attacked Kyle, he was running to extinguish a car fire. How are you justifying the unprovoked attack on Kyle by Rosenbaum?
Sorry, he was 17. Kyle Rittenhouse was in possession of a Smith & Wesson M&P 15, an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle, on the night of the Kenosha shootings. He was 17 years old at the time. Do you live under a rock?
BTW. You never answered my questions. Why? 🤔
The semantics of whether its semi-auto is irrelevant. With a hairpin trigger there are people that can fire just as fast as some full auto weapons. If that dipshit wasnt there with a gun, would Rosenbaum have attacked him? Im guessing no. Thats why he has no culpability.
If that woman didn't wear a short dress......
You were wrong about the assault rifle reference. Also, that's a page from victim blaming 101. Kyle had just as much right to be there as Rosenbaum. However, Kyle wasn't reckless & looking for trouble. That would be Rosenbaum. Chances are, he would've attacked someone else.
Terrible analogy. Child walking down the street trying to be cool with a "long barreled" gun. Basically all that was missing was a sign asking to have his ass kicked. Would you want your child doing this?
Nobody knew his age. In the context of where he was, against a backdrop of scores of people openly armed with rifles and other firearms, he wasn’t particularly conspicuous. Nobody appeared to be alarmed or gave him a second look in the videos where he is seen walking along Sheridan Road with Balch.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed. Additionally, there's no scenario where being armed forfeits your right to self defense.
I didnt know kids could open carry. This coming from the party that thinks kids seeing gay people makes them gay. But you are totally fine with kids going to riots with guns. Make it make sense.
"I didn't know kids could open carry" Thanks for admitting that you didn't follow the Rittenhouse trial. That said, what makes you qualified to comment on it?
You should make more declarative statements without evidence. Very maga of you.
Why are you bringing up politics in a discussion regarding self-defense? I haven't. Is that your way of deflecting from your failed arguments? If you didn't know about the opening carry laws in WI, you definitely didn't follow the Rittenhouse trial too closely.
How's this for making sense? Don't carry out an unprovoked attack on someone who is clearly armed. Sound reasonable? Nothing you've posted would've negated Kyle's right to self defense.
I'm aware. 😂 And? Per WI state law, Kyle was carrying a long-barreled rifle legally in an open carry state. An assault rifle is capable of selective fire. Kyle's wasn't. You said it yourself. Semi-auto.