Who advised you that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with a firearm? It certainly wasn't from watching the trial. That media lie was addressed during the opening statements by ADA Binger & the origin was proven during the course of the trial.
Replies
When did i speak on this?
aug 28, 2025, 4:19 am • 0 0 • view
Ah, I see the confusion. I didnt realize I said that. Yes he crossed state lines. Yes, he had a gun. Yes he lied about that in court and said it was at a friends house. (Black maybe?)..I believe the "proof" that it was in Kenosha was the receipts to buy it. I dont trust his word. Sorry
aug 28, 2025, 7:47 pm • 0 0 • view
It was at Black’s address because it was Black’s gun. There was no evidence that Rittenhouse ever owned it, nor any that he had ever taken it to Illinois or possessed it there. There was no evidence that he had even seen or handled it after the weekend that it was purchased in May until August 25th.
aug 29, 2025, 6:21 am • 2 0 • view
Sure thing bud.
aug 29, 2025, 8:21 pm • 0 0 • view
You are free to believe what you like. All I am saying is that there was no evidence. That is just a fact.
aug 29, 2025, 8:53 pm • 1 0 • view
There was evidence, just none youd accept. Ill agree he got away with it. But hes EXTREMELY lucky to be alive.
aug 30, 2025, 6:31 am • 0 0 • view
And, with respect, if there is evidence, then why not present it? It is a really old debating deflection tactic when people make a claim of evidence, but decline to present it with the caveat of "You would only dismiss my evidence". How do you know if I haven't seen what you propose?
aug 30, 2025, 7:36 am • 2 0 • view
Because its anecdotal and Im not evsn sure. I accept it. I just dont care.
aug 30, 2025, 8:10 pm • 0 0 • view
Then, let’s be fair, in the absence of any evidence, he gets the benefit of the doubt, particularly in court. Agreed?
aug 30, 2025, 8:15 pm • 2 0 • view
There was no evidence that Rittenhouse had ever owned the rifle or had ever kept it. Black testified that he bought the rifle in his name on May 1st and that it was kept at his address in Kenosha. He still owned that gun when it was destroyed in 2022, and had to sign off on its destruction.
aug 30, 2025, 7:31 am • 1 0 • view
All the evidence of the shootings was exculpatory. There was nothing to suggest that he acted unlawfully. There was nothing in the videos or witness testimony that hurt his case for self-defense under WI s.939.48. Why do you think critics ignore this and focus on "He never should have been there" ?
aug 30, 2025, 7:28 am • 1 0 • view
Because he never should have been there. You know this. I know this. If that were yoyr lid, would you say you did a good job parenting?? Would you advise your child to go to a riot with weapon of war?
aug 30, 2025, 8:09 pm • 0 0 • view
No, but I would support his right to defend himself if he did.
aug 30, 2025, 8:14 pm • 2 0 • view
You're not accepting evidence. -You discounted Officer Moretti's testimony. -Inserted your own statistic. "99.9% of the people weren't armed." -You insist that Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm. Despite evidence to the contrary. You lack integrity.
aug 30, 2025, 7:57 am • 1 0 • view
Cool story bro
aug 30, 2025, 8:11 pm • 0 0 • view
Those are the facts.
aug 30, 2025, 8:31 pm • 1 0 • view
You're free to prove otherwise. Oddly, you're making claims that the prosecution didn't even make. 🤔
aug 29, 2025, 8:57 pm • 1 0 • view
Why are you making claims that the prosecution didn't even make? That's odd. Perhaps you can explain this.
aug 28, 2025, 8:33 pm • 0 0 • view