So it doesn’t save enough live so we can’t do anything about it. Let more people die or be severely maimed until we can prove it will save how many lives? Does it need to save 20% more? 60%? 1 child isn’t enough?
Replies
The effectiveness of the law weren’t proven, besides there is risk in everything. If you want to save children then ban pools. Drowning kills more children than guns.
aug 29, 2025, 4:37 am • 1 0 • view
Your on the wrong site spew bullshit.
aug 29, 2025, 12:10 pm • 2 0 • view
Did they actually use Wiki as a source 🤣🤣🤣🤣 You can't make this shit up.
aug 29, 2025, 12:20 pm • 2 0 • view
Well that is a lie on several fronts, stop being scared of everything and actually work to save the lives of children. You don't need a million guns with only two hands 🤣🤣🤣🐔
aug 29, 2025, 12:21 pm • 0 0 • view
A nonspecific reply. Where is the lie(s)? Guns aren’t scary objects, they are tools. If children are taught about guns they are safer. Knowledge is power. FYI , I own many tools despite having just two hands. Different tools for different uses. One size does not fit all.
aug 29, 2025, 12:55 pm • 0 0 • view
You’re right about one thing. Guns are tools. Tools to kill.
aug 29, 2025, 1:03 pm • 1 0 • view
Knives, hammers, axes once were expressly designed to kill as well. They are still dangerous tools. Restrict them as well? Guns provide food, defend against attack, and protect you and yours. Banning everything based on it possibly being misused will make life harder. I’ve evolved beyond that.
aug 29, 2025, 1:40 pm • 0 0 • view
The people who say “come and take it” are the ones that say I need to protect against a tyrannical government. Well here’s their opportunity and they are no where to be found. Either they are too scared, hence the need for an armory, or they never meant it in the first place.
aug 29, 2025, 3:15 pm • 0 0 • view
As a student of history I’ve found disarming the populous often leads to tyranny and genocide. The founding fathers saw this first hand and made the effort to prevent it from happening here. Better a warrior in a garden than a gardener in a war. Why are mass shootings always in gun free zones?
aug 29, 2025, 3:37 pm • 0 0 • view
Seen from another perspective, I too having a history degree, the proliferation of weapons allow bad actors to obtain the weapons and commit said acts of violence. Though as a society we have generally evolved. Most developed countries are not under threat of a violent coup - tbd on USA.
aug 29, 2025, 5:01 pm • 0 0 • view
I prefer a government that treads lightly on it citizens. Disarmament removes the barrier to that.
aug 29, 2025, 5:26 pm • 0 0 • view
No one is disarming anyone. The policies to limit the types of weapons, who can get them, and how quickly they can get them is not a barrier to 2a. If someone meets the legal criteria to purchase a weapon so be it. There is no reason why someone can walk into a Walmart and leave with a gun.
aug 29, 2025, 8:01 pm • 0 0 • view
Yes one person at a time after multiple swings, hits, and stabs. They were also generally no defined laws or courts, except for the few advanced societies in Rome, Athens, London, and the far east. Then guess what humans evolved into developing more efficient weapons.
aug 29, 2025, 3:11 pm • 0 0 • view
True, what was once a battle implement is now a popular sporting arm. Laws should protect or enhance your rights, not hinder or remove them. Because you abuse something doesn’t mean I should be treated as if I abuse it as well.
aug 29, 2025, 3:22 pm • 0 0 • view
Narcotics are illegal
aug 29, 2025, 3:42 pm • 0 0 • view
Off the issue but narcotics are not illegal. They are restricted though just like guns.
aug 29, 2025, 4:38 pm • 0 0 • view
aug 29, 2025, 8:13 pm • 0 0 • view
You’re right you can legally produce, sell, import, and buy cocaine in a free albeit restricted market.
aug 29, 2025, 4:57 pm • 0 0 • view
We want to ban assault weapons, this is not a hard concept. Assault weapons do not provide food, the destroy the animal. Assault weapons do not defend against any attack in regular society, they inflict maximum damage on children in the US. You don't want to defend, you want to intimidate.
aug 29, 2025, 1:52 pm • 0 0 • view
If you use the first defined assault weapon, the StG 44, as a guide nothing in the u.s. comes close. You can spend thousands and wade through a matrix of government red tape to own an assault weapon but it’s already out of the hands of the average Joe.
aug 29, 2025, 2:35 pm • 0 0 • view
Literally no one of any consequence has said all guns should be banned. The smallest effort to save lives has been to restrict who can purchase guns, where they can be purchased, requirements to complete a purchase, types of guns that can be purchased. This does not infringe on 2a.
aug 29, 2025, 3:13 pm • 0 0 • view
We are closer to alignment. 2A is not the problem. The tool is not the problem, it’s the user. There are already restrictions on buying and owning guns as well as where and when they can be used. That is where legislation AND enforcement should be focused, not on the lawful citizens.
aug 29, 2025, 3:30 pm • 2 0 • view
That is not true. Many states have tried to restrict gun purchases to 21 or at least assault rifle styles. NY tried to limit where guns can be carried. Those laws have been struck down by scotus on basis of 2a. DC AG is not enforcing open carry bans… let me know what legislation and enforcement
aug 29, 2025, 3:44 pm • 0 0 • view
This is 2025, I don't care about anything you say to justify your fear. Not a single person deserves to own an AR-15, a modified M-16 A2 assault rifle that you can easily modify to the original firing capacity. You don't have the freedom to intimate others, that is what you really want.
aug 29, 2025, 2:38 pm • 0 0 • view
Well I don’t own an AR-15 or any of its variants and I don’t fear them. You’re projecting your fear on me. M16’s in military form are automatics and already illegal to own. Do you propose banning a legal product because it can be modified to be illegal? That sounds like paranoid thinking.
aug 29, 2025, 3:16 pm • 0 0 • view
They also make him feel more manly, they are very scared otherwise.
aug 29, 2025, 1:18 pm • 0 0 • view
Nobody said anything about guns being scarey, I accused you of being scared. I am a military vet and I know for a fact you only need one or two weapons. You link your manhood to the amount of guns you own because you are scared and weak. Tools have specific uses genius, good try to sound smart.
aug 29, 2025, 1:00 pm • 0 0 • view
As for the law, it was proven to eliminate mass shootings and cut down on gun crime in general. Numbers don't lie, your feelings do. Bitchery has no place in society, man up.
aug 29, 2025, 1:01 pm • 0 0 • view