Occam’s Razor is about preferring the explanation with the fewest assumptions. Given her history of lying under oath, assuming she’s telling the truth now actually requires more assumptions than being skeptical. That’s not simplicity, that’s just blind trust.

False. Your conspiracy theories require an ever-growing web of assumptions.

I proved otherwise.

No, you proved nothing.

But I did. Show me how what I said is false.

No.. you need to show it is true.

I did lol. I explained what Occam’s razor was and how it applied to this situation. How is what I said false?

No, you proved nothing. You just stacked suppositions to make your plot seem tenable.

That would only be true had she not lied under oath. I specifically pointed that out.

Plus, you’re using the either/or fallacy. Everything she says must be false. Grownups know better.