Now ur being disingenious. Lets draw it out with crayons. Are you more likely to die being hit in the leg with a .22 or .556? You are essentially saying swords arent weapons of war becauase knives sometimes kill people. God you people are dishonest.
Replies
Trying to dress up a rifle and ammunition which is widely available to civilians and the public as a “weapon of war” is dishonest. Rifles, pistols and knives are all used in war, but the term is reserved in argument for the AR-15 in this case, because it gives the argument a perceived gravitas.
sep 2, 2025, 8:57 pm • 2 0 • view
You are trying to pretend a weapon of war is automatic only. False. .556 was designed for war. Period.
sep 3, 2025, 5:09 am • 0 0 • view
I haven’t said any such thing.
sep 3, 2025, 6:21 am • 2 0 • view
Wow....lets clap. You are getting there. Those bullets shouldnt be widely available and SHOULD have restrictions. Because their only purpose is what??? Kill humans in war. They were designed specifically for that. Killing other humans in war. Not hunting. Not "self defense".
sep 3, 2025, 5:08 am • 0 0 • view
Hollow points are going to give you just as much a bad day. Besides which, the self-defense statute of Wisconsin actually permits the use of force “intended…. to cause death” where circumstances dictate, so it really is irrelevant which he carried.
sep 3, 2025, 6:32 am • 2 0 • view
Of all the foolish assertions that character has made, that is the silliest of all. Firearms are designed to be lethal weapons. The ammunition is meant to kill. The ammunition used in the AR15 can be used to hunt or for self-defense.
sep 3, 2025, 7:18 am • 1 0 • view