note: the choice of English and continental Europeans is not explicitly mentioned in the transcript and appears to be what the New Right listener implicitly understood as the American ethnos
Replies
"A mix* of... English, Scotch-Irish and continental Europeans" most of whom presently think we Americans are cnts. Yeehaw! *Despite our best efforts in the late 19th - early 20th centuries "Tamed a continent" by stealing and raping, murdering and enslaving anyone we could Fk this colonialists POS
sep 3, 2025, 5:25 am • 4 1 • view
Only includes the Presbyterian / Calvinist Irish people from the north too. That's curious.
sep 3, 2025, 9:21 am • 4 1 • view
Got some bad news for folks who think they're in the right box, it gets smaller and smaller...
sep 3, 2025, 1:35 am • 23 1 • view
WTF are "Scotch-Irish"? The only Irish who count are descendants of the Ulster plantationers or something?
sep 3, 2025, 12:30 pm • 2 0 • view
everything within quotes is from the speech though
sep 3, 2025, 1:29 am • 309 7 • view
sort of baffled at the reason the Catholic rightist praising this speech editorialized it there of all places
sep 3, 2025, 1:33 am • 307 8 • view
did they feel the need to include themselves in the list of good europeans, lmao?
sep 3, 2025, 1:42 am • 271 5 • view
Yes. www.history.com/articles/whe...
sep 3, 2025, 5:34 am • 3 2 • view
I would assume yes
sep 3, 2025, 1:45 am • 1 0 • view
Definitely. Because aside from a few elites in Maryland, the English and Scots-Irish most certainly did NOT include Catholics in their vision of America.
sep 3, 2025, 4:29 pm • 1 1 • view
anyways, link for those wanting to read it in its entirety without editorialization: www.dailysignal.com/2025/09/02/s...
sep 3, 2025, 1:49 am • 176 30 • view
"But the Left took these principles and drained them of all underlying substance, turning the American tradition into a deracinated ideological creed." Deracinated? Versus 'racinated'?
sep 3, 2025, 10:04 am • 19 3 • view
Ngrams: deracinate (peaks 1776-1865?), deracinated (resurgence 1954- ...?).
sep 3, 2025, 10:23 am • 6 1 • view
Wow, even a shoutout to Nazi-admirer Lindbergh.
sep 3, 2025, 2:06 am • 2 0 • view
📌
sep 3, 2025, 10:05 am • 0 0 • view
My first reaction to it, having only read a bit, is "Gods, what a windbag." I suppose it isn't AI generated but it sure has that windy emptiness.
sep 3, 2025, 7:08 pm • 0 0 • view
An American is anyone who lives in America for any amount of time.
sep 3, 2025, 6:27 am • 4 1 • view
“They are the elites who rule everywhere but are not truly from anywhere.” antisemitic dog whistle
sep 3, 2025, 4:29 am • 190 10 • view
For sure, and barely coded.
sep 3, 2025, 2:31 pm • 13 0 • view
📌
sep 3, 2025, 2:12 am • 0 0 • view
I would have read "English, Scotch-Irish...." as a signal that the volk is exclusively protestant.
sep 3, 2025, 3:19 am • 8 1 • view
"Surely this hate group that is purposefully excluding me won't come for me one day if I stay a good little boy" probably
sep 3, 2025, 2:16 pm • 3 1 • view
Any Catholic who is stupid enough to believe that we're going to be part of the ruling class knows nothing about American history. Or else they are planning on pledging loyalty to the Church of America, when Trump decides that Pope Leo is too woke
sep 3, 2025, 2:17 am • 26 3 • view
I am glad you added this to your post. I didn’t notice the selective use of quotes at first. I was appalled that a US Senator would say the whites-only part in public.
sep 3, 2025, 10:11 am • 1 0 • view
thanks my ancestors who spent 4000 years in Northumberland would be mortified by the possible inclusion of the Jutes
sep 3, 2025, 1:32 am • 9 0 • view
Thanks for flagging. I'd posted about that on the other site, but if it's not in the transcript I'm deleting.
sep 3, 2025, 1:29 am • 56 1 • view
basically everything within the quotes *is* in the transcript but the specific mention of anything outside of the scots-irish is not
sep 3, 2025, 1:30 am • 47 1 • view
Do you have a link?
sep 3, 2025, 1:32 am • 21 0 • view
www.dailysignal.com/2025/09/02/s...
sep 3, 2025, 1:33 am • 43 5 • view
sep 3, 2025, 1:34 am • 7 1 • view
Thanks!
sep 3, 2025, 1:34 am • 16 0 • view
This made me laugh. The United States is almost a century older than Italy!
sep 3, 2025, 1:35 am • 389 40 • view
When this nation was founded, central Italy was still ruled by the Pope! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_S...
sep 3, 2025, 12:48 pm • 1 0 • view
Didn’t Germans sign a paper in like the 1880’s making them “Germany”? Before that they were a bunch of wackado duchies and principates - Saxony, Westfalia, Bavaria. Yall know, Crusaders Kings type shit
sep 3, 2025, 1:38 am • 47 1 • view
Germany existed as a political entity since 843 (with maybe a couple of temporary breaks in the Napoleonic era and right before unification), just not as a unitary nation-state in the modern sense.
sep 3, 2025, 2:21 am • 2 0 • view
But there was a Kingdom of Germany from 843 to 1806 (it was the main constituent part of the Holy Roman Empire), and there was a German Confederation from 1815 to 1866.
sep 3, 2025, 2:22 am • 2 0 • view
I knew about the Holy Roman Empire construct of Germany but I kinda always thought of it as a duchy inside the HRE. Completely forgot about the Confederation 🤣 Not to be a racists but they all look the same with their Prussian militarism uniforms 🤣
sep 3, 2025, 2:27 am • 1 0 • view
Italy, on the other hand, was a geographical expression (there was a mostly notional "Kingdom of Italy" until the French Revolutionary era, but it never comprised the whole peninsula and after the 13th century was rarelly barely a thing anyway).
sep 3, 2025, 2:25 am • 2 0 • view
"The Germanies"
sep 3, 2025, 11:50 am • 0 0 • view
yes, Ohio is actually older than "Germany" or "Italy"
sep 3, 2025, 2:27 am • 18 2 • view
Ohio is still the west in my heart! Midwestern Emo keeps the history of Ohios Westness alive! Actually as a Kentuckian, Ohio is just the north to me lol
sep 3, 2025, 3:11 am • 3 1 • view
1871, and they made sure to do it by proclaiming the German Empire in Versailles after humiliating Napoleon III. Imagine if the US declared independence in London after defeating George III.
sep 3, 2025, 2:18 am • 27 0 • view
Man that would have been sweet.
sep 3, 2025, 2:55 am • 4 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/docb...
sep 3, 2025, 2:31 am • 22 1 • view
ancient countries like Czechoslovakia, the Free City of Danzig
sep 3, 2025, 3:23 am • 14 0 • view
European small-r republicans spent 150 years looking toward *us* and the example of *our* history & model to inspire *them*
sep 3, 2025, 2:12 am • 31 3 • view
Damn I cannot believe a landlocked nation with a total population around that of the NYC MSA wouldnt be instantly turned into the global hegemon by changing its laws around
sep 3, 2025, 1:43 am • 5 0 • view
Must be because of the shapes of their skulls or something God, racists are so fucking stupid
sep 3, 2025, 1:44 am • 4 0 • view
"Kazakhstanis" is brilliant, a self-refuting statement
sep 3, 2025, 1:39 am • 6 0 • view
Kazakhstanis refers to all citizens of Kazakhstan regardless of their ethnicity. Not all Kazakhstanis are Kazakhs, not all Kazakhs are Kazakhstanis. The government itself insists on using it in most cases. They only really use "Kazakh", singular, as an adjective. qazinform.com/news/head-of...
sep 3, 2025, 2:30 am • 10 0 • view
TIL!
sep 3, 2025, 2:37 am • 1 0 • view
There's a huge ethnic Russian minority in Kazakhstan, iirc.
sep 3, 2025, 2:38 am • 2 0 • view
Well...Kazakhs are the majority ethnic group, but you can also say "Kazakhstanis" if you want to make sure to include all citizens, many of whom are not ethnically Kazakh (e.g. Russians). It's the same in Turkey. A pedantic point except Schmitt is precisely debating ethnic vs. civic belonging!
sep 3, 2025, 1:47 am • 26 3 • view
You're right, I am hoist on my own pedantic petard; Kazakhstani is listed as one appropriate demonym.
sep 3, 2025, 2:00 am • 10 0 • view
Perhaps he is differentiating between ethnic Kazakhs and citizens of Kazakhstan, a significant plurality of whom are ethnic Russians and other formerly Soviet nationalities. If so, he is indisputably a Russian asset and must be arrested and yeeted into the sun at once.
sep 3, 2025, 1:47 am • 4 0 • view
overcorrecting for the p-word
sep 3, 2025, 1:42 am • 0 0 • view
LMAO someone corrected Hochmann in between posting the speech at Daily Signal and him promoting it online.
sep 3, 2025, 1:45 am • 124 7 • view
It’s a terrible comparison. Citizens of Kazakhstan are called Kazakhstani. Like 30 percent of the country are Russian or Uzbek or whatever. There was a community of hundreds of thousands of German speaking Germans there till not that long ago. Hochman is an idiot who knows nothing of the world.
sep 3, 2025, 2:08 am • 13 1 • view
Ethic Kazakhs are called Kazakhs.
sep 3, 2025, 2:08 am • 8 0 • view
This is coming from someone who would definitely reject the Constitution and all it stood for if the revolution were today
sep 3, 2025, 1:50 am • 45 0 • view
I mean he’s rejecting it right now so yeah that’s a safe bet
sep 3, 2025, 4:46 am • 17 0 • view
I don't want to pile on here but just to emphasize: you don't have to be an ethnic Kazakh to be Kazakhstani, you could be ethnically Russian, Korean, Uyghur, etc. It's a pretty diverse country
sep 3, 2025, 2:35 am • 13 0 • view
This is true of all of the "stan"s
sep 3, 2025, 2:36 am • 3 0 • view
not all of them, since not all of them derive their name from an ethnicity; Pakistan is not based on an ethnicity but was coined as an acronym of "Panjab, Afghania, Kashmir, Sindh, and Baluchistan"
sep 3, 2025, 6:49 pm • 3 0 • view
The denonym for the country and the ethnicity being different I mean. It's like having a different word for being of Han Chinese background vs a citizen of China
sep 3, 2025, 2:40 am • 5 0 • view