avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

36/ AI: Lessons from Abroad Dynamic caps (tied to benchmarks) are more adaptable than flat caps, especially in volatile economies. Enforcement matters: Countries with strong regulatory bodies (like France) tend to see better outcomes.

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

37/ AI: Balance is key: Too strict a cap can reduce credit availability; too loose, and it invites predatory lending.

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

38/ AI: Your idea of prime + 3% for secured and prime + 6% for unsecured is well within the range of what’s been tried—and arguably more conservative than some international models.

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

39/ AI: If the U.S. were to adopt something similar, it would be joining a global trend toward rate structures that flex with economic conditions while still protecting consumers.

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

40/ ME: I would love to explore how a U.S. version of this could be structured in legislation or what political hurdles it might face? I would also like to ask who would be the biggest opponents in the Senate and House of Representatives based on lobbyist activity and campaign contributions?

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

41/ AI: Absolutely—let’s dive into how a U.S. version of a prime rate–linked interest cap could be structured in legislation, what political headwinds it might face, and who the likely opponents would be based on lobbying and campaign finance patterns.

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

42/ And all of the rest of that was interesting, but perhaps too long, except maybe for this last bit: 🧠 Who Might Oppose It in Congress? While I can’t name specific lawmakers with certainty, patterns of campaign contributions and lobbying activity suggest that opposition would likely come from:

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

43/ Likely Opponents: Indicators: Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) Lead sponsor of GOP student loan overhaul; backed by financial services donors

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

44/ Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) Chair of House Financial Services Committee; strong ties to banking industry

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stealth Bomber @stealthbomber.bsky.social

45/ Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) Longtime advocate for payday lenders; significant industry donations These lawmakers have historically received large contributions from financial institutions and have opposed tighter lending regulations. End/

jul 1, 2025, 9:30 pm • 0 0 • view