It’s also true of South Korea, both are their cultures are so toxic that people actively choose not to extend it via reproduction. That’s pretty damn bad.
It’s also true of South Korea, both are their cultures are so toxic that people actively choose not to extend it via reproduction. That’s pretty damn bad.
That's not the reason you sound racist AF
"South Korean & Japanese culture which puts insane pressure on people to succeed in life and specifically in a corporate job where they are expected to put 10-12 hours a day in isn't the reason why birth rates are falling RACIST!!!!" Just shut up.
There's nothing particularly special about Japan and Korea. Literally every industrialized nation on earth has a fertility rate well below replacement. Japan has a higher fertility rate than both Spain and Italy!
Korea and Japan's demographic problems are worse because until recently they have been relatively unfriendly to immigration.
www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journal... The countries with especially low fertility rate continue to have it so due to the same factors, just in different amounts. No, there's nothing special about Korea or Japan. These issues exist in many places and are the same throughout. Korea is the most extreme
example of the issues while Japan has eased up in recent years. Both countries are also massively investing in incentives for parents, but still don't address the main causes that research has found.
Once women are better educated and have good employment the birth rates plummets.
Because if they do get married, they are expected to both have a job and be the care takers of everything at home. When men put in equal effort at home as well as work, birth rates go back up.
I’m not sure that is true, young women are not as invested in having children.
www.nber.org/papers/w33311 From the research I've seen, it shows that when there is more equitable distribution of childcare and household chores, fertility rates rise.
They may rise, but not enough for replacement levels from what I’ve read.
That's possible, but just because these are big factors doesn't mean they're the only factors. Cost of living, childcare, and so on also play roles as well.
That’s what I mean by young women not being invested, these are the facts of having children, the financial loss to women’s lives is huge, superannuation ect. As we see now with the amount of homeless women.
Excuse me. I lived in and married in Korea. The only culture I found toxic on Korea were the Americans.
Scrolling and I see “Mike Honcho”…ha! Needed that chuckle my friend..
That's an interesting assertion; can you substantiate it objectively, and without an opinion?
Are you kidding me? There is hard data to suggest both countries will age out due to the lack of population replacement between both countries, there is no “assertion” about it. You can go pout and deny it if it makes you fell better about it I guess.
Nah this person is trying to paint it as racist to say that Korean and Japanese culture are the cause despite literally every study and all research done into it shows it's the culture as the Korean government can't even pay people to have kids.
I literally read up on this shit out of interest lol, it blows my mind that both countries, both of which have fairly good standards of living, have to beg the population to have kids. If that doesn’t scream how bad both cultures are to both parents and kids, then what will ultimately?
They LITERALLY cannot pay people to have kids. The Korean government has tried a ton of different incentive structures to boost fertility rates and none of it worked. The women in Korea themselves explain why and that it's the work culture, the expectations placed on them, and the fact they are
So it’s the household culture
You can't separate workplace, household, and just culture. They all tie into eachother. There's major social expectations on women that women aren't happy with in Korea and so would rather focus on their own career instead of dealing with the negative issues.
Aren’t you agreeing with what the other guy said?
treated like single parents in a marriage.
Good for them if that's the reason. Feeling like a single parent when married is not exclusive to Asian culture.
Yeah, nobody said it was. There's a lot of factors and these countries tend to have very conservative and traditional views of family roles.
That is your interpretation of the data. China is incentivizing birth rates now.
Because the one child policy failed and there’s a disproportionate male to female ratio that forced them to do that? Imagine that
I'm just trying to say that a declining population is world wide in 'first world countries' and picking off particular ones and claiming their 'toxic cultures' to be behind it is erroneous. (we had 3 kids for what it's worth, 2 of them when were very much on the bones of our bums)
'toxic cultures' Nothing racist there
If people are choosing not to have kids to extend it, then how is it not toxic? That’s the crux here.
To be clear, they are TRYING and FAILING. www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/chin... It always boils down to gender inequality and cost of living. It's always culture and social economics.
Posting this under you since they blocked me lol.
OK we should return to the days before free access to contraception when there were families of 5 - 10 kids? It's a world decline, and women are able to consider vocation over having 'One for mum, one for Dad, and one for the country' as one Australian Treasurer infamously suggested.
There's a recent Korean drama called Doctor Cha that dealt with the issues that wives and mothers experience in Korea and it was incredibly popular, likely because it resonated with so many people
You should specify male patriarchy
How many times can I like this?
As often as it needs to be said till they start actually listening to us instead of grinding us down
People around the world don't want to have kids because of the economic climate. What you're referring to isn't a "toxic culture" of Korean or Japanese people, but the crushing effects of late stage capitalism. It just got to Korea and Japan first.