you'd miss about 27% of the active userbase which isn't trivial but is also a whole lot better than what you'd get trying to operate Bluesky without Bluesky's corporate servers
Replies
right, so the question is: why would I care about either of these things if I can viably use the network without them
aug 23, 2025, 10:06 am • 7 0 • view
In the fediverse's case you can viably use it and many do, here's an analysis showing that a year ago 47 instances that amounted to 60-70k users were blocking mastodon.social: stefanbohacek.com/blog/fediver...
aug 23, 2025, 10:09 am • 2 0 • view
why do you think this is a good thing lmfao
aug 23, 2025, 10:15 am • 8 0 • view
it’s so crazy how all of you people use bluesky pbc PDSes but talk this up
aug 23, 2025, 10:16 am • 5 0 • view
why do I think it is a good thing you can operate fediverse instances while choosing to defederate with anyone you want and still be able to participate with the wider network? I'm afraid you need to explain why you don't a bit better.
aug 23, 2025, 10:38 am • 1 0 • view
you can probably block all users of a PDS somehow, but it really sucks when fedi instance admins block other instances with people you wanted to follow. basically breaking up access to communicate in the already significantly smaller network.
aug 25, 2025, 11:26 pm • 4 0 • view
the fediverse system of federation sucks (see bsky.app/profile/j4ck... and bsky.app/profile/inde... for gotosocial examples) drama just makes content discovery which already sucks for newer/smaller instances even worse
aug 25, 2025, 11:28 pm • 5 0 • view
this kinda strikes me as saying the concept of a (web)server sucks because you may end up getting a wave of requests.
aug 26, 2025, 7:19 am • 0 0 • view
if simply being on the network can DDOS you be accident that’s kind of a problem
aug 26, 2025, 9:50 am • 3 0 • view
need a bit more information to determine if it's really a DDOS. Or are we calling any uptick in traffic always a DDOS?
aug 26, 2025, 10:07 am • 0 0 • view
lmfao
aug 26, 2025, 10:21 am • 2 0 • view
yes, it does suck when your admins decide to block stuff like all of Mississippi or Palestinians, or Turkish opposition figures etc. Luckily there's the ability to choose who you let your admin be at least in some systems.
aug 26, 2025, 7:21 am • 1 0 • view
Bluesky public benefit corporation is required to follow the law, so their client follows the law. There are alternative clients which do not follow the law. “admins” do not exist in this sense. But the point is that neither atproto or fediverse are above the law or particularly resistant to it.
aug 26, 2025, 9:53 am • 3 0 • view
and my point is that you have a Lord in Bluesky corporation. One whose power is not so easily removed from Bluesky unlike the power of some dinky little fedi instance admin.
aug 26, 2025, 10:06 am • 0 0 • view
theoretically, sure, but you are not explaining how that authority actually works, or how it has anything to do with the admin warfare on fediverse, which seems like a different issue altogether. Because bluesky PBC is not actually stopping you from accessing the atproto network from Mississippi.
aug 26, 2025, 10:21 am • 3 0 • view
you do realize that them putting the IP block in place does take access away and require action for a large number of people, practically speaking every single person that currently lives in that state. That's because Bluesky is almost entirely run by them in practice despite ATProto handwaving.
aug 26, 2025, 10:36 am • 1 0 • view