Yeah I remember in Night when Eli Weisel was like: …and then the SS soldier took the baby and threw it in the air and shot at it with a machine gun, and I thought to myself “it’s immoral not to vote for this, if his opposition has worse immigration policy”
Yup. Totally comparable. I was gonna say it's more like the neighourhood is on fire and you can put some of it out, but not all. Blue is water Red is gasoline, and Third Party or nothing is Letting it burn. Guess which side you're on?
I mean no I think my comparison, genocide to genocide, is a lot more apt than your pulled-out-your-ass hypothetical.
Except it isn't. Because the vote didn't just affect children in Gaza, you ignorant halfwit. It affected the immigrants in America. Immigrants who are being illegally arrested and deported because the President wants them gone.
Yeah my comparison addressed that directly. “Never again” means never again, not “I’ll defend it if the other guy seems worse”
Not how it works. Never how it works. You had the chance to prevent the rise of authoritarianism in your own damn country, and you and millions of others either refused or just ignored the call. It's not about "defending genocide," moron. It's about stopping things from getting even worse.
You were literally using textbook soft genocide apologia earlier, you are defending the pre-Trump portion of the genocide even now.
“What about Ukraine!!” lol what the fuck was that. Doing whataboutism to defend participation in a genocide.
Also, I’m not defending the genocide, moron. I’m pointing out that you’re defending Jill Stein for her evil.
lol what are you even talking about at this point, yes responding to one genocide by saying. “What about this other thing?” as a way of diverting the conversation, is absolutely defending genocide.
It’s not defensible. There isn’t an argument you can make that would convince the millions of people who are standing in clear eyed opposition to genocide, to change their minds and support a person literally participating in one.
The fact that your philosophical response to a fucking genocide is moral subjectivity, is a joke. That moral framework allows you to condone literally any act no matter how heinous. If supporting a genocidaire is necessary to combat the Greater Evil, what isn’t?
That means, for example, given the opportunity to guarantee a lesser evil outcome, you morally ought to be willing to personally murder, torture, rape, to guarantee that outcome.