I want to just go up to people who write non-fiction books and ask them, how did you decide new yorker voice versus super relatable voice? *grabs suspenders and shakes author* Tell me!!
I want to just go up to people who write non-fiction books and ask them, how did you decide new yorker voice versus super relatable voice? *grabs suspenders and shakes author* Tell me!!
Voice took me SO long to reach, and is still the thing I'm excavating for in every chapter. But I'm writing a literary memoir about grief and wilderness in a time of climate collapse. Which means I need some funny to break it up every once in a while too. I think my whole book is about voice.
Answer: Who is your core audience?
You mean the new yorker does not want to reach everyone, everywhere? But all those extra diacritical marks seem so welcoming.
Haha I love making coordinate look more german, but I would guess the broader population is less enthused. It does depend a bit on your goals/audience. I wanted my book to appeal to a lot of people. I aimed for accessible and still could have gone further with that, in retrospect.
My choices will likely not satisfy some academic readers, but that wasn't my core audience, so I can live with it. To the extent that your skeets are reflective of your voice, I'd lean into that. It's compelling and persuasive.
Lols my posts would make the new yorker man's monocle fall out
As opposed to how i post, which is way too full of profanity to get past my editors
As opposed to how I write, which is a combination of "oh, yeah, that's a good idea" and "oh, no, that's not a good idea at all."
Now I’m wondering which voice I’ve been writing this book in for the last year!
Gotta tell me your comps for that 😉
I think l've been unavoidably influenced by the style-as-no-style consensus that emerged partly in reaction to the excesses of New Journalism. E.g. Rachel Aviv is one my absolute favorites, her prose is so restrained it's actually bold and audacious.
But I also read everything Kerry Howley writes because in addition to being brilliant and relentless her voice is very distinctive in a way that make my eyes get wider. So there's your New Yorker v. New York contrast I guess!
Rereading this to get a feel www.thecut.com/article/erew...
The Peleton reveal is amazing! Also, I see what you mean by the no-style style of writing. Feels particularly well-suited to narrative nonfiction.
“I suppose I made my fateful choice when the light died in my father’s eyes. I’d told him of my decision for an accounting major - a rebuke to his clown college dreams. The sun had set, but twilight’s lingering made ambience enough to reflect his pain, even as his greasy smile remained painted on.”
“I knew then that a trite sort of coöperation between indie middlebrow reader and equally tedious author would define the tragedy of my writing, beyond the balance sheëts.”
I had to learn the difference between an umlaut and diaeresis because of these people
Thanks everyone! The general advice was to use the voice I use when I teach. That means lots of pop culture references and never winding up in the new yorker.
Goodbye possible world where someone says I write "beautiful prose"
Maybe, but my the wide new vistas opened up now for “scathing,” “furious,” and “actually funny”
I sent the first draft to Chris and gave him some points I'm still considering and one of them was basically "I seem very mad at X, Y, and Z (because I am) but that's not how you persuade so be on the lookout for where I should be less angry"
But maybe you could use the British spelling of "Welp,..."?
Mmm... there is much more beautiful prose than is dreamt of by New Yorker editors. I once spent a week reading dozens of longform New Yorker and Atlantic articles. At least at first impression there were 3 types, and the "true (and social) crime" type required only a waterfall of luridity.
That's very fair. I get that in just a product of my context so I think that writing is better than my natural writing.
All I know is that I've worked 10+ yrs to eliminate mid-branching sentences, and people still recommend an "academic style with punch" book whose first chapter is full of ... mid-branching sentences.
Exactly! @elienyc.bsky.social compares several SCOTUS justices to Marvel characters in his books.
I'm curious about what publication has the "super relatable voice" you prefer? (aside from The Chronicle, obviously)
Obvi the Chronicle. I think there are lots of spaces with more relatable voice. NYMag is one. But I do also enjoy The New Yorker. That post wasn't a dig at them cause I assume everyone realizes that is a very particular way of writing.
Super relatable - because I’d like people to read all of it instead of skimming just the topic sentences.
After some period of doubt and struggle, I landed on the philosophy of Popeye the Sailor, I yam what I yam. I think ultimately, authenticity, which creates a sense of comfort with the reader is the way to go.
Excellent philosophy and useful info!
Some of it is where you come from, if you had New Yorker voice hammered into you, and if you want serial rights there. I like reading voice-ier writers, and find NYer voice a little soporific — so it is an easy choice to not bother
If you're trying to decide what voice and style to write something in, I might know a guy. (It's me. I'm the guy.)
Iiiiinteresting. I'll keep that in mind.
I always say: write with the voice you use to teach
Yup
Well that does explain all the questions in the first draft (I looove a good question). Thanks for the tip y'all!
If your goal is to make at least one huge winking dig at academics and academia per piece, there is no substitute for New Yorker voice
Now what if the winking digs are at Harvard and the economics discipline?
My forthcoming book was apparently described by a member of the University of Chicago editorial board as a book that “could be sold in Wisconsin gas stations” so it’s possible that with book 3 I have finally found my voice?? Otoh it will no doubt be critiqued as too academic AND not academic enough.
that is such a damn mood. can't win in either camp. SO EXCITED for your book though!!!
Thank you!! I so appreciate your enthusiasm and support lo these many years! ✍️🍻🌿
A) Congrats on the forthcoming book! B) I'm glad you went with the voice you thought was most appropriate for your audience. Critiques will always have thoughts but *you* deciding how *your* work gets communicated is a beautiful thing.
Thank you! It was definitely a journey, with much assistance from my writing group.
You could probably write your next book just unpacking that comment. Layers upon layers of Midwest stance and attitude wrapped up in that one
also yes