Seriously, and answer this question, what in your question today is different from what you've been asking about the plans Fyk has been expressing since he lost in June?
Replies
aug 28, 2025, 7:00 pm • 1 0 • view
Because he has given more details he has said that the courts are supossed to look at the facts and they ignored all of the facts in his they case they just said facebook was just unilaterally immune from everything it
aug 28, 2025, 8:33 pm • 0 0 • view
There are no more details he can give. He is blocked from suing Facebook and the gov’t again on these claims or any others he could have brought with regard to these facts
aug 28, 2025, 8:34 pm • 1 0 • view
And that is not what was said in those cases. FFS, in the case against the gov’t, it was ruled that he had no standing to sue the gov’t for 230. It’s over for him, as I have repeatedly explained. He and anyone else who think he can change are legally moronic.
aug 28, 2025, 8:37 pm • 1 0 • view
He’s so dumb he doesn’t realize the the Trump 230 EO is legally irrelevant even if the courts did look at it.
aug 28, 2025, 8:39 pm • 1 0 • view
Let me continue if anybody restrains his rights he is allowed to challenge that and challenge that action and the courts are supposed to remain an arbiter instead the united states stepped in and said he is not allowed to do anything to them
aug 28, 2025, 8:41 pm • 0 0 • view
Do not continue or I will block you.
aug 28, 2025, 8:42 pm • 1 0 • view
The courts were the arbiter and ruled a) he failed to state a claim due to 230 against Facebook and b) he had not standing to sue the government that 230 was unconstitutional. He was given his chance to appeal and he did so and lost. He was given due process and is just butt hurt he lost.
aug 28, 2025, 8:44 pm • 1 0 • view
And the government has every right to pass 230 or any other law that does tort reform to give immunity. There is nothing unconstitutional about that.
aug 28, 2025, 8:45 pm • 1 0 • view
But what will the 4th Circuit and the doj will do if he bring that constitutional challenge of 230 on that court ?
aug 28, 2025, 8:46 pm • 0 0 • view
Asked and answered. Any such case is barred by rea judicata. I’ve repeatedly told you this.
aug 28, 2025, 8:48 pm • 1 0 • view
Do you think that the doj will be forced to deal with
aug 28, 2025, 8:48 pm • 0 0 • view