If your point was "young men are marks" then the alt-medicine>tradwife pipeline is a really poor deflection.
If your point was "young men are marks" then the alt-medicine>tradwife pipeline is a really poor deflection.
it's not the only example it's just a clear and fairly tangible one. basically it comes down to fact we can't just assume it's only a male problem, rather that they haven't figured out how to target young girls the same way yet. and it's dangerous to get complacent
It's definitely not *only* a masc problem, but it is *largely* a masc problem. Those are different measures.
right but my point is that, for the latter point, it's "for now". it could very suddenly not be the case.
Okay, that's fair enough concern I guess. My point is this lady articulated an epistemological crisis posed by young men's penchant to be rubes, you climbed *all over* her mentions going "well wut abt how girls r rubes sometimes, what about if girls were worse!?" and that is embarrassing behavior.
that's a bit of a misrepresentation when 1) i did a QT, and was responded to via QT then 2) responded to arguments people were making/misrepresenting of what i'd said, lol
That is an incredibly lazy analysis of the veracity of your argumentation.
first of all,
Alright that one got a laugh.