The actual primary voters don't support your assertion
The actual primary voters don't support your assertion
Which specific assertion? That Bernie would be a better candidate? That Hillary pushed trump to run?
That they forced a candidate that few people wanted. You can't keep your own argument straight.
I didn't say they forced her, I said they pushed her using underhanded techniques
..."forced in a candidate few people wanted"
Ah my bad. Thigh tbf, I'd say the point stands. They forced her in by undermining the one candidate that would win against her. She wasn't forced in as in "there was no primary" Are you people always this illiterate or just when it suits?
It is adorable that you call someone else illiterate after they show you exactly what you typed.
Inartfully argued truths are still true.
Except none of you have established the truth of your opinions.
The DNC argued in court that they had the legal right to undermine the popular vote.
Yep they argued it but they never said they did it...also there is zero fucking evidence they did. Sanders had his teeth kicked in. Cope harder about it.
Except they didn't. The people rejected Sanders. It was over after Super Tuesday.
The actual primary voters were undermined.
Except they weren't...the race was over on Super Tuesday.
The race was over long before Super Tuesday. Because of the legal ways the DNC and Clinton herself interfered, along with thier wealthy donors.
Except there is zero proof of that happening.
ivn.us/posts/dnc-to...
Yeah, you're tragically dim.