Maybe take it from a former reporter that she is. I know she's weird af on social media but I've read her stuff over the years and I've never had a problem with it. You should read the actual story we're all fighting about. It's totally fine lol
Replies
A. I've read it. I wasn't impressed. B. She's not a great reporter.
aug 31, 2025, 8:41 am • 3 0 • view
I'm not saying it's *impressive*, I'm saying it's not a scandalous story. It's just a story, it's just normal journalistic work. The only reason people are fighting about it is because she is a weird person online lol
aug 31, 2025, 8:44 am • 1 0 • view
You're right, it isn't scandalous, yet Lorenz seems to think it is.
aug 31, 2025, 8:45 am • 2 0 • view
And get desire to make it so is why she isn't a great journalist.
aug 31, 2025, 8:45 am • 2 0 • view
You know I'm just gonna say it's concerning to me all the guys I'm fighting on here tonight who purport to be good Democrats are doing so much work to be exclusionary and to gatekeep. Kind of gets back to my original point.
aug 31, 2025, 8:51 am • 0 0 • view
Because I think Lorenz sees conspiracies everywhere? That her shit talking affects her work? Because I think she's a shit journalist? That's exclusionary? OK.
aug 31, 2025, 8:54 am • 2 0 • view
You told me I'm not a Democrat because we disagree lol
aug 31, 2025, 8:54 am • 1 0 • view
And yet, that was not where you choose to write that response, you did so after I pointed out that what Lorenz wrote is not the scandalous affair she seems to think it is.
aug 31, 2025, 8:56 am • 2 0 • view
And of course, what I actually said was that you weren't a Democrat because you seemed to really dislike them.
aug 31, 2025, 8:56 am • 2 0 • view
How is that different than what I said?
aug 31, 2025, 8:57 am • 0 0 • view