Expert opinion provider 🤷🏻‍♂️
CCF Alumni Neuro-Oncology : Molecular Biology
384 followers 86 following 1,743 posts
view profile on Bluesky
So we should trust the fools, the ignorant, the self-appointed opinion makers, the wormed brain quacks ???? The failure of logic is beyond comprehension.
Ah so mitochondria produce ATP and if a child is seated, non-interactive on their iPhone playing an app they must have low ATP levels to account for this state of being? Surely there’s a naturopathic remedy for such a serious illness?
When your one-liner is to target someone’s physique you know there’s no valid argument.
If Bernie wants to make a difference for Americans then invest in research. It’s completely illogical to take a 9.9% passive holding in Intel
So he’s a pedophile and a druggie. Seems like good material for the Trump Hall of Fame - he’d fit right in.
So we have real life confirmation of voter activation/participation with Mamdani messaging that completely contradicts the theoretical model that’s failing. And yet you can’t challenge the Democrat leadership that they know better 🤔
When there is a choice for investment and you choose the wrong script.
How many stops does this strategic muddle train have? It’s again ground to a halt but at no time has it ever been driven to a conclusion.
Yes they do- (1) previous reliance on gas for energy production and (2) old long established grids that are being replaced.
Immediate costs are higher as MWh rates are higher. Delayed costs will be higher due to environmental impact. It’s all known science and math but as we know we’ve dumped that.
When you filter you lose 1 immediacy 2 emotional authenticity 3 shared connection 4 validity
Hip pain.
Its role is not to direct invest even in industries that are deemed to be essential for security. Regulatory and legislative measures and incentives are more efficient and better.
The Intel board makes a share placement - nothing unusual about that and an accepted decision to bring in a new major shareholder. The issue isn’t the mechanism of investment. It’s rather the arbitrary stock picking distorting the market. Government sets the investment environment. /1
There is naive and then there is Jeffries. 2026 will not be 2018 and if he thinks so he’s delusional.
Trump is not a racial arsonist — he’s simply a racist. Call it what it is. Don’t over complicate.
If a democratic politician is a serious politician they would stop paying homage to the “word police” and call this out as complete bs. Stop being so hijacked by irrelevancy. When you’re fixated on the language the message is lost.
This is the most superficial analysis on the subject - the cost of travel from any two cities includes more than the flight. Barcelona to Paris is not just Tarradelas to de Gaulle. It’s the cost of time and transport to and from the airports and the cost of 2 hours of waiting to depart.
If he is delusional he is not fit for office. I believe it is improbable there is an orchestrated conspiracy to misinform him. Based on past and present behaviour there is a 99.9% probability that he is deliberately and knowingly lying.
The Foreign Malign Influence Centre staff are now reassigned to the new Domestic Malign Influence Center as would be expected
The chairman title is very apt - the Great Leap Forward with simultaneous Cultural Revolution — we know how successful that was.
B) few countries in the world lack renewable energy land or sea acreage C) China has added 11GW of nuclear power from 2020-1025. It added 510GW in renewable capacity in 2023 alone.
A) Internationally solar is the fastest growing sector (including the US) - it has nothing to do with state sponsored economy (though the US is now doing the same eg Intel) that argument is mute. Further, Chinese state support of solar ceased in 2020.
And no it wasn’t free. $8.9 billion paid for the 9.9% placement.
Intel board made a share placement.
bsky.app/profile/qm61...
bsky.app/profile/qm61...
I’m surprised there isn’t an NIH institute of alternative medicine where we can promote irodology, naturopathy and reiki.
Well as we know Trump believes he’s the Chief law enforcement officer of America.
The “uneasy mix” is the flagrantly corrupt use of law enforcement to enact blatant retribution.
Nuclear fusion is a minimum of 20 years away. Its costings are in excess of fission. China installed 93 GW of solar capacity in May 2025. It’s simply not economically feasible against utility sized renewables
If you think nuclear is the future you’re not looking at $/MWh cost of production or at the international trend (that is market driven)
The Maxwell meeting consisted of a review and agreement on the pre-written “interview”. Where is the evidence for there ever having been an interview?
Actually no - the most limiting factor for widespread adoption of renewables is political. When you look at the environmental and health costs of coal, gas and nuclear energy production the economic benefits of renewables (including economic loss from health, environment etc) wins.
Genius investor on behalf of the citizens of America
The $8.9 billion investment also stipulates that the shareholding is passive and that the US government will vote as per the Intel board direction on nearly all matters making the comment that the government has “control” to be also misleading.
This is a false and misleading public statement by a major investor - the US government agreed to fund Intel (under the ChIPS Act) with this being offset by a share placement equal to 10% equity in Intel. It was not a “free” gift.
In fact he’s actually threatening more crime if the numbers don’t change. That can only be interpreted as a threat to harm which is a felony.
The confronting finding is that a majority of Americans are racist - it’s not a backlash. It’s simply a poll of their appalling values.
From the perspective of an outsider the stated party is NOT perceived as tough on crime - that’s only an internal perception. The rest of us see the US as a corrupt state and the republican president as a criminal
Murders in Washington DC 2025 Union Station marked by blue dot. It’s not the area of concern.
When your foreign policy is advised by ex Fox staff and car dealers, and you’ve dismissed the knowledge holders in the State Department, it’s no surprise that the “new” position is the same as the old one. There’s no institutional memory or strategic thinking.
Why doesn’t the NYT just come out and say it - “in Trump’s ideal picture of America we’re white nationalists”
Washington DC has a range of 14-18 murders/month (source : crimedatadc). So far in the first 1/3 of August there have been 5. It would appear that the incidence remains stable. Vance remains ill-informed as usual.
Eventually doing a “nuttlick” will enter common parlance to describe a fake deal between nations.
The politics of envy works well even when proffered by a billionaire
Whenever an opinion is offered with the statement that it’s “just a fact” it is clear that it’s just an opinion.
So says the Secretary for Health Propaganda 🙄
So having noted the disparity of interpretation what is the solution?
Jeffries is beholden to his corporate sponsors- it’s hard to come out and confirm you’re a bought agent
Mamdani is actually just responding directly and forcefully with real facts and its armour piercing in quality. He takes on the allegations and innuendo front on and retaliates superbly to win ground every time Coumo challenges him.
If you listened to the comments Mamdani made you would appreciate that he sought justice and dignity for both Palestine and Israel. Your misinterpretation of his comments is damning against you and reflects a failure to genuinely and without bias listen.
Yes so Joe inherited the war from his predecessor 🤔 trump.
So there were 7 GLOBAL conflicts simultaneously occurring ???? Yes I know one can’t expect an understanding of language or use of facts in the new order
The new 7 wonders of the World 🤔
Government used to just release statements on policy and decisions. Now it’s an attempt at click bait and propaganda generated by a social media ignoramus.
Marketing is all feelings, so that’s universal. What needs to happen though is stopping this type of justification for stupidity and lies. Every crazy idea can be sane washed if we are inventive but that just allows such behaviour to be acceptable. It needs to be called out not explained.
He’s setting up the conflict of media attention- no doubt it’ll run exactly at the same time as the Putin Trump lovefest due to maximally annoy the felon.
Thanks for your opinion but that number reflects only reported significant accidents so yes I have taken the correct number.
If a senator is going to make a risk assessment statement then it’s expected that he has an understanding of his subject matter. He was making a political statement that was founded in ignorance and error but I don’t think his issue is primarily numeracy illiteracy - it’s more deliberate than that.
Yes but they’re not senators making decisions that have significant consequences for others. So if you don’t want to wear safety boots your loss of toes is your choice, and it affects no one else. All citizens expect a higher performance level for a senator.
What is more concerning than his ignorance or stupidity is his role as a senator- if he can’t make a considered decision based upon real data for risk of injury how does he make any considered decision on legislative matters? Does he use the same ignorance and stupidity representing his electorate?
So the incidence rate of carjacking in DC is 5.1/100,000 residents. The incidence of car accident in DC (2022/23) 22,000/443000 registered drivers = 4966/100,000. So he doesn’t buckle up because he feels safer? The problem with being a lying idiot.
Haberman is an apologist for Trump. She is meant to be a professional journalist- to research the subject, determine the facts and report honestly. Instead she deliberately reinforces Trump’s dishonest narrative. There’s NOT a crime problem everywhere - there’s a lack of journalistic integrity.
Recognition of Palestine is contingent upon a number of commitments including the Arab League’s demand that Hamas end its rule in Palestine and disarm. It would appear that all the preconditions for recognition that Blinken seeks are already in place.
I’m yet to see a case where the need for paramilitary on the street is a selling point for real estate 🤔. Can we stop trying to find a remotely plausible reason for his inane behaviour.
Soon he’ll be referencing qi and the chakras he believes necessary for good health
We have now reached the Hallmark of book marketing - it’s not a reader’s thing - it’s a marketing ploy.
It all started with the banana tariff 🤔
Let’s be more accurate - US based airport lounges are not worth it. You need to get out of the US and see Asia and Europe where the lounges are completely different.
Trump did business through the 1980’s and 1990’s when “dealing” was rampant. Dealing was mutually beneficial outcomes for the signatories of the deal - it never meant a better outcome or price or volume. It’s how much could be extracted for personal gain. So his comment to reach a deal is consistent
US government spending was $6.75 trillion in FU2024. Saving a $100M is not the incentive. It’s control. What makes US academic institutions so naive in thinking they can buy off the administration? Do they no understanding of long term strategy?
Sure
Have a look at AEMO. We’re moving pretty aggressively to renewables with the main issue being avoidance of the recent Spanish outage due to demand fluctuations. Happy to PM if you have questions
That’s current and predicted power supply from renewables in Australia. So many people have solar panels on residences and now moving to community systems. We have a lot of sun so not really a challenge. All government subsidised.
Currently 45% from renewables, 2030 target 82%.
That is profoundly wrong. Inequality is driving the growth of high end residential investment and the marked reduction in entry level housing. Housing availability and pricing is not simply a single order supply and demand equation.
So you believe that the worsening inequality is not a significant factor?
Well the last time a comedian decided to focus on his second career he became an international statesman and President of Ukraine. I think you have some good mentors to refer to.
Attention span of a 2 yo
In most states of the US it’s either 4 or 6 storeys - about half are at the 6 storey (or 18m) level.
I also note that sprinkler systems are mandated in the US generally above 75 feet. So these systems would not be currently installed in the 4-6 storey apartment building. It would be an additional cost.
Developers would love to revert to single stair. The apartments would be slightly cheaper. But is the cost saving worth it?
In the presence of fumes remaining in the apartment is not optimal. Automatic fire doors to isolate would not be possible with a single stair. You would obstruct exit. So if you’re at the non stair end of a level you’re at a survival disadvantage. And the standards need to reflect disabled also.
The reason that the 2 stairway regulation in over 18m height residential buildings has become the standard is the issue with a fire preventing passage to the single stairwell, resulting in inability to exit. It’s not fire but smoke that will kill and no apartment is that sealed.
I’m trying to determine at what point you may feel that arrangement was inadequate. For a 2 level site each stair related component would be legal. But at 10 levels it would not be. At 10 levels you would have 30 family units emergently exiting via a single stairwell. How many levels do you propose
So is that the 3 units to one stair plan?
Can I ask which one of the two plans do you prefer ?
Unfortunately you can’t reach that conclusion from 23 residential fires in 1.53 million homes. The data actually says that there is no difference. Lower density housing with a font and back door appears to be equally safe as multiple exits from higher density.
In 2024 there were 23 residential fire fatalities in Connecticut from with 19 being within a 1 and 2 family residential facility from a total of 1.53 million facilities (US Fire Administration). (Not statistically significant). So I’m not sure what your point is.
Perhaps you could answer the question? So 65% of Connecticut residences are single family (attached or detached). 10% are multi residential special purpose facilities. Of the 65%, the median age of residence is significantly older than the 5-49 family units.
How far do the paranoid delusions have to go before some sane adult in the room takes control?
This is a Ponzi scheme.
I’m trying to work out are you pro or anti safe exits?
