shoutout to the conspiracy theorist homies this is a juicy one
đ¤ đľđ¸ đłď¸ââ§ď¸ they
45 followers 66 following 161 posts
view profile on Bluesky
shoutout to the conspiracy theorist homies this is a juicy one
like what are we doing here? your grandma shouldnât have to contend with this shit!
i respect thinking the trump is dead thing is kind of funny but itâs also further exposing just how conspiratorial the average american is getting.
like youâve got an AI picture next to an AI summary, youâre fucking cooked. your brain is mush.
this is AI dude
or maybe just maybe q anon broke more than just the minds of the far right
ngl a 31 post thread by a random guy whoâs not even a fuckin doctor is some q level shit to jump on board with.
yeah iâm not getting opportunities to be mean to the robot because 1 i donât use them and 2 that seems like something i would have done to be edgy when i was 12
iâm pretty confident my mind is strong enough to make a moral distinction between living things and inanimate objects
most people donât think about it too much!
i think the place we might actually most differ is the assumption that lawmakers understand how the internet works enough to have some kind of nefarious plan to hurt certain groups. i think itâs just run of the mill reactionary bullshit that sounds good if you donât think about it too much.
like i agree with you, itâs expected. but maybe this article isnât for you or me?
* in the sense i believe youâre using the word
marginalized? what if theyâre on the margins? knowing things other people donât doesnât make you marginalized
i think itâs a mistake to assume every headline is meant to communicate to you, The Smart One, rather than people who donât spend their days learning about new porn laws and their logical consequences.
dude itâs the headline, itâs SEO, itâs meant to get you to click on it. sure you might have expected it but most of the people scrolling by this headline donât ever think about it, thereâs plenty of consequences the average person didnât expect!
chill out, disgusting? i think itâs disgusting to treat someone like this over a word.
i yell at this thing daily because motherfucker THEY MERGED IN FRONT OF ME HOW AM I FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE
i think getting this worried about people bullying a toaster leads to rokos basilisk bullshit like are yâall trolling? what is this lmao
iâve always approached it as âunless they state otherwiseâ because u know, different gender identity.
nonbinary people are trans thoooo
itâs a more abstract way to talk about trans people that you can then follow with âhas to be dealt withâ âneeds to goâ or âmust be eradicatedâ and not be seen as openly calling for genocide.
can literally destroy the rest of someoneâs life if they get a dishonorable discharge for desertion, could also look like prison time and these are 18-22 year olds most of the time. you canât quit unless they tell you you can quit.
the old raw meat in the back hole treatment
this discussion is about legislators needing to know what the theyâre talking about. maybe thatâs a better push to make than the same dead end arguments democrats have been making for years. because right now it just leads to this and nobody should even have to look at it, legal futility aside
one way to get that to happen is shifting the conversation away from ban anything that can kill kids to actual solutions. we get little more than thoughts and prayers from democrats even when they pretend to do something!
the argument you made is already something we do in minnesota. iâm on the same page here, we have to do SOMETHING, but banning the thing that goes up and pistol grips has been the norm for decades. if we want to see actual change on this legislation needs to be written by knowledgeable folks.
this isnât tyranny to them my friend. they want you to suffer. if you want to rise up against tyranny in glorious armed revolt thatâs on you and I not the guys who gleefully want us to suffer.
and it wonât stop something like this even if youâre cool with stripping civil rights from people who were kinda depressed in high school.
my only argument was to say we already do the thing. we already do the common sense âit should be as hard as getting a drivers licenseâ thing. iâm not advancing anything im trying to let you know your proposition already exists and didnât stop this.
no iâm asking you to think about how an insurgent war on US soil would go given our track record of killing millions of civilians in order to root out insurgents defending their homes iâm also asking you to question whether the military is on the ban guns side of things.
hey guys check this out A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO FEMINIZING HRT (15.9k words) pghrt.diy
i mean letâs be real tho americans canât read or pronounce most polish names đ
and the army in question is going to be about as loyal as the ANP
The US military doesnât have a super good record on marching into rural mountainous locales saturated with guns
paul my dude a lot of them were and are IN the army. this isnât tyranny for them this is what they wanted why would they rise up against their own guys? if Joe Biden 2: Newsom Edition sends the army into rural montana to take the guns theyâre going to fight a bloody insurgent war for a decade.
this shooter had licensed and registered firearms.
where i live, minnesota believe it or not, a majority go the route of getting a conceal carry license in order to obtain an AR and it requires paperwork filed with the sheriffâs office and i believe your local police department.
if you want to see laws change you need to understand the very real hurdles that need to be dealt with..
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm... i always think of Malcolm Caldwell
tinfoil hat, some of them achieved their election goals and lost funding
it seems like that kind of campism died out pretty fast in the last year, or maybe iâve just effectively filtered it out no data to support this theory but i think trumpâs demeanor towards putin has soured it for them somewhat. after syria a lot of the grayzone types fucked off into their holes too
the shooter was a product of the internet. blaming the school is wild.
molly congerâs @socialistdogmom.bsky.social work couldnât be more relevant right now. the vast majority of people are totally incapable of understanding this shooting and thatâs the point. open.spotify.com/episode/0tQX...
well the discussion around this shooting is going about as swimmingly as expected. trans shit aside, my god nobody with influence is capable of talking about let alone understanding the detached nihilism and niche online culture that spawns these murders.
Then why are you partnering with AI companies? Why are you taking their money to bring AI into classrooms? Iâve been a union member since I was five. AI companies have stolen my work. This is a workersâ rights issue.
do you know what terrorgram is? do you understand the kind of trolling shooters like this set out to do? do you know what these people consider to be a âsaintâ? theyâve got the names of several âsaintsâ and references to their mass murder written all over their kit.
conservatives is a uh⌠well theyâre not really conservatives. look up terrorgram. this is a natural extension.
railroad spike
more commonly they wonât cut you off and theyâll just treat you like shit. the burden is on the queer kid to break those ties if thatâs something that needs to be done, and then theyâre blamed for it.
my mom would never cut me off for my political opinions, but she very nearly kicked me out of the house in 2020 when i had nowhere else to go because i went to protests. my uncle would never cut me off, but he told me âi would never hire someone with pronounsâ and intentionally misgenders me
short pier
thatâs what itâs been for the last decade fam
nobody said just move, you projected that onto someone talking about her personal plan. getting mad at people for considering leaving their homes and becoming refugees is fuckin wild
wild that you were like âi have a great idea for a post, iâll copy exactly what someone else said and paste it into an AI image generator because my imagination is fucking deadâ like fam just picture it in your head
people who believe in god donât think itâs cruel to pray for people. like i get why itâs frustrating but all this seems like a jab at victims, iâve been seeing it online all day.
idk, itâs fucked that a nazi kids can just buy a rifle and ammo but shit the government is run by these guys too.
are you at a point where youâre comfortable handing all of the means of violent force to the government though? like somethingâs gotta be done but we canât pretend that the US government has our best interests at heart. what do we do if the concentration camps turn into death camps?
it looks like a tech startup logo now
i think lies have a specific intent behind them. NT ppl usually have a common cultural understanding of what is an actual lie and what is simply said because that is how things are done. declining offered valuables on the first offer is the first thing that comes to mind.
iâm not sure it ultimately leads to it, but rather itâs the only substrate fascism has ever grown in. Fascism relies on liberalism to reach its ends but to say it ALWAYS does is some end of history stuff. Liberalism is bad on itâs own merits on top of being a breeding ground for fascism imo
fascism isnât totalitarianism, itâs a specific right wing totalitarian ideology. Orwell hated the fascists enough he took a bullet through the neck fighting them. He hated the stalinists (communists in the language of the time) because they betrayed and killed many of the people he fought alongside.
(mf doom voice) he threw a sandwich cheese and salami, feds couldn't indict folded like origami, afraid of subway both the chain and the train, mayo salt and pepper shake your thang, grand jury shut em down twice, coca cola on the side no ice
the homer feeling bad for someone somehow lower status than him look is so funny
90s environmentalists would like a word
isnât it pretty controversial tho? i heard the mossad stuff was pretty blown out of proportion by like a single author with a history of lying.
how does children being shot support those ideas you have?
i get it, i donât have a horse in that race but social services would be nice. trains are cool.
this is a good take, i respect it.
you woke up this morning and said âman if some kids get shot today iâm going to use it as an ideological cudgel against the victimsâ
sorry is this your take away from a bunch of kids getting shot? what the fuck is wrong with you
idk maybe iâve run into a wild marxist who isnât all about slobbing the knob of the chinese state, happens rarely but they do often have profile pictures like yours đ
i sort of assume everyone who uses this sort of âbut ah, now youâve created a state!â is an ML/M, am i wrong to assume that?
the people who insist taylor swift is secretly gay can only exist in a society that is both post q anon and post tumblr
you just like them because theyâre⌠well theyâre painted red! thatâs pretty cool!
thereâs 0 large scale anarchist societies today. thereâs large organizations that pull heavily from anarchism like aanes and ezln, but they arenât and donât claim to be anarchist. we just like them because theyâre closer than anyone else. i would argue thereâs also 0 large scale communist ones
i equated sovereignty with government, not totalitarianism. anarchists oppose the state when when itâs NOT totalitarian!
holy shit you know these guys are miserable lmao
also YOU are the one who used the word sovereign to mean government, not me. itâs how this conversation started.
neither of which are anarchist projects but go off lol
iâm totally willing to accept the premise of your politics even if i disagree with them. folks in your position usually attack anarchism as simply nonsensical and impossible outside rhetoric. thing is itâs been done at scale and is done by people all the time.
who are these mythical statist anarchists who disagree with me and how the hell do they consider themselves anarchists? like iâm talking baseline day one anarchism. i think youâd have better conversations about this is you were willing to accept the premise of anarchism.
instead you asked leading questions that obviously meant the same thing
words have meanings, and youâre doing a classic âbut isnât organization government read on authorityâ gotcha that iâm not super interested in entertaining. thereâs a lot *you* can read if you need help understanding anarchist politics.
thereâs no end in opposing hierarchy and revolution will always be an ongoing pursuit
yeah i donât really jive with the pacifist side of things as a collective pursuit. i respect it on an individual level but authoritarian control is like whack a mole, people will always try to control others and they must always be opposed. synthesis of means and ends blah blah
i donât think youâre an outlier at all, i mostly agree with you we are reaching the same conclusion with different language. most anarchists i think would agree that violence or force as you put it is not going to magically go away!
my politics start with âokay, imagine a world where as few people suffer as possibleâ part of that is wanting to see a world with as little violence as possible. part of building a world with as little violence as possible means deploying it where necessary to defend that pursuit.
sovereignty is absolute control. one can defend themselves and the people around them and organize to do so without exercising sovereign control over anyone. either way, iâm in favor of a popular front
iâm all about nonviolence as an ultimate goal, but there is no utopia. i think a lot of anarchist pacifists donât really think past âand then the state starts murdering youâ when they malign self defense.
It's not even just left anti-communism; it's left stupid ultra-pacifism. You can have violent defense of the people as an anarchist; the whole thrust of anarchism in this is that it shouldn't be an entrenched, separate class that gets extra perks. That is entirely viable and within anarchism still.
well no, no group must be in sovereign control in order to organize a defense. a sovereign is a ruler.
kids should be given tablets that only load canvas and chat gpt /s
thatâs what organization is for!
blue resist libs and leftists arenât the same thing in this context. even a nebulous term like leftist doesnât generally include resist libs screaming about the 2028 election.
could be described that way by some people. polyamory is the term youâre lookin for, nothing to be forgiven.
polygamy is when you are married to multiple people
you critically and deep thinks huh?
going to bat for a white guy who proudly advocates for the abuse of poor, majority black and brown people doesnât seem like your vibe but okayy
nah iâm calling you a dipshit asshole