Happy Labor DayâŠđđŒ #sketchbook #sketch #art #sketchinkrepeat
I like to sketch. I would be honored if you followed. đđŒ Shorts: youtube.com/@sketchinkrepeat
244 followers 123 following 861 posts
view profile on Bluesky
Happy Labor DayâŠđđŒ #sketchbook #sketch #art #sketchinkrepeat
We only need Elonâs child to march in and shriek, âThe King has no clothes!â because clearly, no one else dares. I never wondered what it looked like to sell oneâs soul, but now I see the aftermath, a hollow, feckless husk, stuffed with endless shallow flatteries to sate the devilâs pride.
Beats me but weâve had to pick up their slack for far too long. Now they want it all handed to them by the grifter in chief. They need to step up after all that âDonât yaâll tread on me! These colors donât run!â bidâness. Turns out theyâll just hand over the country to any olâ foo.
I donât know, but whoever it was deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.
Not at all. Nothing goes well with this administration. So if we are going to be oppressed we may as well go down trolling if we canât defeat them. But Iâm open to suggestions. Please feel free to share some. *Do note I am only joking. You canât actually believe this was serious.
Great opportunity to troll him. He should call him up and say âHi I have a problem. Can you help me fix it?â Gas him up real good then when he asks what it is simply say âYeah thereâs a felon and traitor destroying our country and Iâd like to have him arrested.â Long awkward pause, then âHahaha!â
It feels like some inside joke with Putin, a public humiliation of American troops. What a shameful figure, instead of leaving dignity, he withers away like a petty, half-rotted tangerine that fell under the cart and sat half baked in the hot summer sun expiring hourly.
Happy Monday⊠#sketchinkrepeat #sketch #sketchbook
If saving democracy requires me to say something nice about Trâmp, then sure, Iâll compliment his tie & we can all move on. It seems a small price for functioning elections, & for enabling trials that bring his enablers to justice, both the loyalists & those pretending to stand with the people.
Did anyone think these warships off Venezuela were just for funsies? The plan is likely going to include getting us into a war so he can dismiss elections. They can bomb Venezuela from afar all day and night and make it look âthreateningâ so he can declare martial law and lock it all down for good.
Serious question: If he is deported to Uganda, is he free to accept a flight to a preferred country if one is offered to help him?
Guy from America here, I still canât believe the world thinks we freely elected him. He stole the election. Just look at his history of corruption. His projections before doing his crimes. Couldnât be any more obvious. We didnât elect this buffoon but in time we certainly will rid ourselves of him.
Remember when they said âThereâs no circumstance in which he comes homeâŠâ? Yeah that aged well. Now those Epstein files. This is a serious matter.
Remember, you chose to engage with my post. One would think youâd know something about prophecy before lambasting me in such a Trumpian manner. Iâd expect that level of ignorance from Fox News but not a scientist such as yourself.
Thereâs plenty of engagement here proving otherwise. You still havenât answered my question on prophecy. Instead, you veered from the Qurâan to some odd rant about quantum physics and outrage at Deepak, one red herring after another to avoid showing you donât know what youâre talking about.
As for quantum physics, I only said I enjoy it, I never claimed to be a scientist. My interest came from research for a story. Yet here you are cursing at me over it, still dodging the question. Days ago you said the answer âtakes time,â but six days in, youâve offered nothing. Need another six?
Itâs rich how you seek to change the narrative. I made a comment. You responded to it quite boldly. But because you canât back your words you curse at me, attempt to belittle me, when itâs quite obvious Iâve backed up my words & you have yet to offer me a simple answer you claimed to know. I wait.
The problem is you are trying to enlighten me but in six days Iâve done more to educate you on prophecy than youâve done to make your original statement valid.
Iâm glad you can do something with this. But my question is about prophecy. Please refrain from changing the topic. If youâd like I can address that in another discussion at another time. The same with quantum physics / mechanics which has you making all sorts of assumptions.
For someone who claims to deal in facts, youâve offered none to back up your claim. Six days in, & all youâve shown is a lack of understanding of biblical prophecy. Instead you return making demands that suit your narrative & showing disdain for some person that has obviously ruffled your feathers.
You made claims as to why prophecy wasnât a âthingâ and the Bible was fairy tales (despite there being historical data that confirms things in the Bible). You claimed if you canât prove it, with dates and times, or something tangible then itâs not real. So I simply asked you to share your truth.
If you canât understand why that says a lot. YOU came & commented at me. Made some bold claims too. When I asked you to back them up you offered nothing other than a runaround. Youâve yet to answer. But now want to try and flip it on me. Why? Because youâre aware that what you said holds no weight.
To be fair, they both look like theyâd be on the list. Just sayinâ.
Well they took the words out of most peopleâs mouths literally. đ
If scientists didnât do their due diligence, how would they know that classical physics breaks down at the quantum level? Itâs the same here, how do you know prophecy isnât real? Youâve offered no concrete evidence, yet expect me to accept it as if it were a new religion simply on your say so.
To be clear, not to say I expect you or anyone to accept blindly what prophecy says, donât misread. Instead I encourage people to be wise & do their research. Seek truth for themselves. If you were lied to, more reason for you to seek truth. Wouldnât you want to know? Especially as a scientist.
So whoâs the primate here? The one backing their claims with truth, or the one flinging poo with no facts? You want blind acceptance, yet when challenged, youâre no better than the prophecy you say only fools follow, demanding belief simply because you say so.
You said: âThere is no such thing as "prophecy". And your book of ancient fairy tales has zero bearing on any of it, except for the fact that so many misguided primates believe that ****.â Thatâs not a fact, thatâs conjecture dressed up as certainty. Yet now I must accept your factless fairytales.
âThe problem is, you have made the âtermsâ such that your claims are unfalsifiableâ A) you approached me claiming I was a fool and knew nothing. B) when I asked you, on YOUR terms to explain to me why, my one question asking for proof, you had no answer. Instead offering empty assertion.
Also, what do you mean by ânormalâ? Am I not, because I reject your fact-evading truth? You claim science yet dodge facts with bias, assuming I dislike you for prophecy? I donât, I hold no ill-will. You came to me. I offer answers to your barrage of questions, you offer cherry picked commentary.
No, not what I said. Iâll give you time to reread with comprehension. As Iâve pointed out, all youâve offered is commentary. Iâm asking plainly, what scientific proof shows prophecy isnât real? Where are your dates, times, and facts?
Tell you what, answer my one question now on the sixth day, and Iâll consider your desire to now know the meaning of âquantum physicsâ. Though it feels more like a distraction from the fact youâve only offered commentary on my answers. If you canât answer, just say so. Remember, you claimed to know.
We need to project these videos onto large public areas. In multiple cities and towns. Let them all see what they have done. Justice will come for them all.
Itâs fine to hold your own views on religion, but calling me a fool without backing it with evidence, exact dates, or times, by your own standards as you set forth to try and dismantle my post, is audacious. Five days in and I more convinced in my truth than your âfeelingsâ about it.
The problem is you missed the context of my first post & focused solely on the religious angle. I said, âHis folly mirrors prophecyâ (go to the beginning) and it does. His foolishness unfolds like a prophecy, his actions seeming almost destined to follow a warning that could have been foreseen.
The problem is youâre trying to force the data to fit your conclusion, rather than letting the evidence guide the conclusion. Thatâs not how science, or truth, works. Youâre the âscientistâ. I would believe you to know this most basic of facts.
In short, to disprove biblical prophecy, one must show it fails on its own terms, not merely that another religion has its own prophetic claims. Same applies in science, you donât dismiss physics by pointing to chemistry, you test physics against its own principles. Why treat religion differently?
Itâs also comparative, not contradictory, At best, it opens a comparison between texts. But comparison isnât disproof, it just shows that multiple traditions make truth claims.
Itâs Faulty Logic or a Red Herring: It shifts the discussion away from the claim at hand. Saying âthe Qurâan also has prophecyâ doesnât prove biblical prophecy false, only that another tradition makes prophetic claims too.
Internal Consistency: To evaluate biblical prophecy, you must test it against its own context (historical, textual, theological). Invoking the Qurâan doesnât resolve whether a biblical prophecy holds up.
Hereâs why: They are different sources, biblical prophecy is judged within the context of the Bible. The Qurâan is a separate text with its own claims. One does not automatically disprove the other. In additionâŠ
As for my supposedly not getting it, you are the one repeatedly displaying why you do not actually make an argument. Pointing to Islam or the Qurâan as a rebuttal to biblical prophecy is illogical because itâs a category error, mixing frameworks that arenât meant to cancel each other out.
My argument stands. Both science and prophecy start with the unknown. As a scientist, you know this, unless you claim to grasp the universe without âinterpretingâ data. Scientists, like prophets, often disagree, so disagreement doesnât equal falsehood. Personally, Iâm a fan of quantum physics.
Looks like an environment I saw while building a clans base in Warframe. đđ»
Furthermore Iâve been respectful, Iâve answered your questions and youâve skirted my one question for four days. But I am not discouraged. While you seek to call me a liar, or a fool, I am able to share the truth here and hopefully someone will appreciate it.
You argue like science doesnât do these things all the time as well. In addition we are discussing the Bible. Not the Quran. Considering my comment was based off the Bible, your constant attempts to divert to suit your argument says quite a lot about your inability to answer my one question.
On the contrary. I have spent four days providing proof. You on the other hand continue to cherry pick from that truth to suit your narrative. I made it clear itâs not just up to interpretation but also up to other aspects that help verify. As I said before your argument even goes against science.
I even gave you that there is subjective in the process in some cases. But I also shared a means to ensure that subjective isnât full of malarkey. Like saying simple things to argue against them like âThatâs bull!â or âYou donât know whatâcha talkinâ âbout!â I politely ask for your facts.
I donât doubt someone lied to you. Weâve all been lied to. But that does not erase truth. You seek to dismiss my statement without all the facts. You were pretty confident when you chose to engage my statement, and the topic you felt confident in discussing with me. I ask again, please provide facts
And again you failed to follow what I saidâŠit must meet all the criteria. Yet youâre fixated on simply saying âitâs false!â without even once giving me your facts. Seems to me youâre subjectively interpreting what Iâve said to suit your narrative. To be clear, I believe youâve experienced false.
SoâŠcan you answer my question? Iâd like to know why you claim to know prophecy is not real. You have a lot of questions. I answer them to the best of my ability. But you have yet to answer my one question with actual facts. Was there a scholar who figured it out? Did he write a book? An experiment?
In short, true prophecy fits its context, aligns with truth, fulfills in detail, resists secrecy, and bears good fruit. I should add I also find horoscopes foolishness. So we have that in common. đ
âŠConsensus: Is it supported beyond one personâs âsecretâ view? Fruit: Does it produce truth, clarity, and integrity, or confusion and exploitation? A sound interpretation should meet all five.
Misinterpreting things is common. Thatâs why you must adhere to the following to make sure you avoid that⊠Context: Does it fit the time, culture, and text around it? Consistency: Does it align with the rest of scripture? Specifics: Do claimed fulfillments match the details?
Wow. You seem to be really upset. I answered very clearly but I suppose I must thumb it down.
And to be clearâŠI am referring to âbiblical prophecyâ because that was the subject of my post you called foolishness.
So please, I ask again, offer me solid factual verifiable truth that prophecy is not real. Do you have a date and time where you can reference it being proven false?
To address your fascination with my religion: Iâve never claimed one in this discussion. When you tried a Quran âgotcha,â I simply said, âIâd find no issue with it if I found truth in it.â Clearly, I seek truth from any source. There are no alternative truths unless youâre MAGA. Only truth.
In both prophecy and science, a sign isnât false simply because interpretations differ. It often takes time, context, and accumulated understanding to reveal the truest meaning. Does this now make science false by your definition? Letâs not be ridiculous.
So subjectivity doesnât equal falsehood, it just means the sign requires wisdom, context, and sometimes patience for fulfillment to clarify its meaning. This happens all the time in literal science.
Biblical signs often work the second way. They point, they warn, they provoke reflection. Their truth lies in their source and purpose, not in whether every interpreter agrees on one reading.
Think of it this way: A stop sign is objective. Everyone knows what it means. A dark storm on the horizon is a sign too, but its interpretation varies, one sailor sees danger, another sees opportunity for good winds. Neither is âfalse,â but one may prove more accurate in hindsight.
But a sign being interpreted subjectively doesnât make it false, it simply means its meaning isnât fixed in one universally agreed form. âŠ
Sure there are subjective elements: Symbolic visions (beasts, horns, stars falling, etc.) that lack an immediate, obvious anchor. These require interpretation, and different readers bring different lensesâhistorical, theological, culturalâso subjectivity enters in. âŠ
Signs and patterns in prophecy fall into two categories: Objective elements: Things tied to historical events, numbers, or imagery with clear cultural meaning. For instance, âseventy yearsâ in Jeremiah referred directly to the Babylonian exile, not something open to endless interpretation.
Oh I hear myself. The question is do you hear yourself? Now on the fourth day you have yet to offer anything other than belittlement, & misquotes of what I have offered in answer to questions you ask but clearly do not fully understand yourself. Prophecy does not need to be interpreted subjectively.
Heâs so ignorant.
Heâs remaking it into his new home. Heâs always been gaudy like that aunt with dusty candy in a dish and plastic on the furniture. He wouldnât know class if it came with a teacher.
He should be removed immediately. Why are officials playing these games unless they are complicit.
Itâs a lot of fun. Snag one before tariffs mess this up too. #sketchinkrepeat #modretro #chromatic
So Iâve answered you. As for what I mean by the basis of your argument, you claimed I was wrong with strong certainty, even aggressively at times, which implied you had proof. So again, I asked show me solid, fact based evidence, or am I just expected to have faith in your belief? Itâs been 3 days.
"Hey everyone, let's pillage that village until 11:59pm on Tuesday cause God's coming on Wednesday!" Would those people be truly good? Or just self serving until the last minute like the current regime robbing and pillaging this country until the boat sinks before jumping into life rafts?
The problem here is you misunderstand the meaning and thus are looking for a fortune teller to tell you everything exactly as you desire. Consider this, if the Bible is meant to truly convert the lost, what good does it do giving exact dates? Everyone would just be âbadâ until the last minute.
In other words, prediction is about anticipating an outcome, not necessarily pinning it to a clock or calendar. Biblical prophecy tends to lean toward the general/conditional style: âIf you do this, then that will happen,â or âIn the last days, these signs will appear.â
A prediction can be definite and timed: âTomorrow at noon it will rain.â General but directional: âThis storm system will bring heavy rain soon.â Conditional: âIf you keep driving recklessly, youâll have an accident.â
Thus, prophecy is more about revealing Godâs perspective, His warnings, promises, and guidance, rather than giving a precise itinerary of future events. And if youâre looking at âpredictionââŠ
Forth-telling: speaking Godâs message into the present situation, offering correction, encouragement, or warning. Or Foretelling: pointing ahead to what God intends to do, sometimes symbolically, sometimes directly.
Forth-telling: speaking Godâs message into the present situation, offering correction, encouragement, or warning. Foretelling: pointing ahead to what God intends to do, sometimes symbolically, sometimes directly.
âŠwhich interpreters have debated for centuries without a consensus on exact chronology. So, prophecy offers warning and direction, not a date stamped invitation as you ask. The word prophecy doesnât simply mean âpredicting the future.â In scripture it often carries two dimensions:âŠ
âŠprophecies often emphasize what to look for rather than when exactly it will happen. For example: Jesus himself said, âNo one knows the day or the hourâ regarding his return (Matthew 24:36), The Book of Daniel & Revelation use symbolic imagery & numbers (beasts, horns, seals, trumpets, etc.),âŠ
it tends to frame events in terms of seasons or eras (âin the last days,â âa time, times, and half a time,â âforty years in the wildernessâ), symbolic numbers (like 7, 12, 40, or 1,000), which usually carry theological meaning rather than literal scheduling, Signs and patternsâŠ
I see now. Well, let me break it down simply. Prophecy: a prediction, foretelling the future. (Noun) Prediction: a thing predicted, forecast. Biblical prophecy, while often vivid and symbolic, does not provide precise dates and times in the way a calendar or clock would. Instead,âŠ
Oof! This aged like week old cream cheese sitting in the hot Georgia sun.
Dominion Voting getting paid simply for being honest.
Beautiful! đđ»
So I ask you again, as someone who was deceived to do the right thing and speak truth. Share with me if you know why what I said was false.
The commandment says, âRemember the SabbathâŠâ Yet Thomas Aquinas wrote in Summa Theologica: âIn the New Law, the Lordâs Day replaced the Sabbath, not by precept but by the Churchâs institution and Christian custom.â So by customs and NOT Godâs word. This is why people hate the church. Liars deceive.
Iâve answered your questions; youâve dodged mine. Saying it âtakes timeâ has proven fruitless, you jump from topic to topic, book to book. False religions deceive like this too, counting on people not to verify the truth. Many know the Sabbath is Saturday, yet for comfort they follow Sunday.
Switching the argument to the Quran only serves to make the point that you INFACT do not have an argument and are now trying to argue using the Quran simply because I said I was not as versed in it. It doesnât weaken my argument at all. You cannot disprove my original biblical statement. 3 days now.
Using the Quran and Bible in analogy when discussing prophecy works only if youâre clear about the context and the type of comparison. For example: The Bible often frames prophecy in historical narrative, while the Quran sometimes emphasizes moral and spiritual lessons in prophecy.
What I would suggest is that you instead offer me some point of reference. What would prove prophecy as true to you? What would prove it as false to you? What is the basis for your argument? Then perhaps we can make sense of where you stand. Because right now you have yet to prove why Iâm wrong.
Youâve shifted from dismissing my Bible-based comment as âliesâ to discussing the Quran. This conversation is about biblical prophecy. Switching texts mid-argument is like me moving goal posts to disprove you, it weakens your point. Respectfully, the topic is the Bible.
Emphasizing âIF they prove truthfulâ doesnât refute my point, it restates it. Dismissing prophecy as lies or foolishness may reflect your past deceptions by others, but that doesnât erase the fact that truth exists and can be found. I didnât come to these conclusions on a whim. I sought truth.
Based off historical accuracy, & verification through fulfillment. The same as with the Bible. There are various ways to test for truth. But I digress do you have an answer for me? Or more questions? At this point, three days in, I feel you have no response for your claims. Just questions to delay.
If they prove truthful. I do own one, but I am not as familiar. But again this is more diversion. Based off what I said originally, you said I was wrong. Please tell me why with facts not more questions or diversions or feelings. Otherwise I must assume you do not have a case.
Also to answer your other comment: If I woke to find it false, Iâd be disappointed but glad to know the truth. However, imagine waking to find it true, how would that change your life? Disagreement doesnât prove falsehood; we doubted humans could fly until the Wright brothers. Didnât make it false.
Why should I take your argument seriously when you offer no facts? I accept biblical prophecy only when it proves true in the Bible, regardless of religion. You focus on declaring me wrong, which says more about your motives than mine. I bear no ill will, yet you cannot accept that.
You were extremely confident that I was wrong. So I genuinely engaged politely with you because I am open to discussion. I, contrary to what you may think, always seek truth. I am open to being taught. I am still waiting to learn with facts why I am wrong. I have been met with a run around.
I would also suggest, respectfully, that you are being disingenuous in what you claim to know. I posted my thoughts here. You came, and simply disagreed because it was a comment mentioning religion in some way. Iâve asked you one question. Offer me âfactsâ that show what I am saying is wrong.
You offer commentary, not facts. I could say, âMany disagree with you on prophecy,â but that isnât evidence. You havenât shown why Iâm wrong. Research shows itâs clear who the âLambâ represents in the Bible. People can disagree. But then they are no better than MAGA claiming Trump is honest. Liars.