I mean it's just wildly strange he of all people would take a stand on it lmao
Protecting the internet, one firewall at a time. Also known to smash a few forehand smashes and sip on some seriously good whiskey.
25 followers 18 following 206 posts
view profile on Bluesky
I mean it's just wildly strange he of all people would take a stand on it lmao
Still don't understand why electoral boundaries would be drawn by the very people who run for the office those electorates would vote for.
The American ones. You know, the crew that invited a journalist to a signal group chat with operational intel
Let's be honest, leadership can't manage a group chat let alone a drone. Let them sort that out first.
That's healthy para social, not militarized like some swifties who take shit to nth degree.
It's a socialisation issue to an extent, I'll give you that. Metoo has been going on for 15 years or so, if they haven't changed, they need to be ostracized without contextualisation. It's ruthless for sure, but it's been a long time talking about the same thing.
Then you're welcome to explain your logic.
To be a joke. Travis is an athlete in a sport where strength and speed is respected, it is funny he'd take the name swift while playing the pinnacle of said sport.
A misogynistic joke would assume that Taylor would take Travis' name, not the other way round.
If it was misogynistic it would have been a joke about Taylor Kelce. Jesus yall need to touch grass.
How you so prepared to be offended by default this was your take on a legit funny joke. Would you rather be offended at this or actually get offended by the shit Charlie Kirk said yesterday.
I don't know if we want to create a market for UberBombs tbh
How bout you focus on you know, not letting journalists in group chats that have operational details? You know, get the basics right before attempting to get decent drone tech. Its also just wild you spend nearly a trillion on the defence industrial complex and still have these articles.
Incel culture existed long before podcast bros, I've no sympathy.
I know, I'm just pointing out that incels have a grand zero of any of the qualities to be a basic human being let alone attractive to another human being.
Trump must be frothing at the fact he has a DEI hire.
So RFK is a SHE?
To be fair that's also an oversimplification of women, atleast based on my experiences Some women go for looks, others go for intelligence. incels don't fulfill any of the criteria for any woman. Nor would I argue they have a solid understanding of who they are and what they want.
Lmao, this is when you know the law is right
mate they cant get out of the basement let alone spend energy on anything else.
Well according to these blokes you're clearly reading smut, you know cause economics is super sexy.
Ridicule is only recognisable by those who are intelligent which is not the category these people fall in
Lmao man's marrying a billionaire, tables are turned, shoes are on the other foot and the pants are worn. CK needs to do what he does best, get on his knees in the oval office.
That's an insult to 4chan tbh atleast they go full incel, most of the shit I see on Twitter is half assed, much like the platforms owner. Admittedly I haven't been on it since Musk rubbed his Musk on it.
So incels are incels. Why platform their view like this, it validates them more than it does ridicule them in my view.
Who TF blaming women for this I'm blaming men, specifically Joe Rogan and Andrew Tate. Morons who exploit stupid morons who haven't opened a book in a decade.
And yes I'm a hater, I have a disdain for para social relationships being interpreted as personal by fan bases, and I dislike mass media for mooching that to drive clicks. It's pathetic.
How the hell is this a tech article.
Don't know if that was in reference to what I said, they have the resources, but not the ROI. A state sponsored actor has a better ROI on attacking enterprise infra, not individual users.
My cyber security mind says yeah, my open source mind says this is a bad idea. As for state sponsored actors, they're far less likely to target consumer grade software, they're more likely to engage in supply chain attacks, like SolarWinds or XZ utils.
Wasn't a policy put in place by a conservative government... But at its core, the policy was a cheap win for our government, however is under developed and borderline unenforceable. Regulating social media use is great on paper, it's poor in execution.
It's all part of the plan, books allow you to develop empathy by exposing you to different perspectives. That in turn makes you more likely to call out culture wars, which the GOP don't want because it means people will be turned off by their platform.
In March 2025 the Earth was hit by a fast radio burst as energetic as the sun, but lasting only milliseconds. www.wired.com/story/scient...
For now* im grateful for it don't get me wrong. But Google had do no evil when beginning, Twitter didn't really force content back in 08 too
au.pcmag.com/ai/112716/el... This is 100% going to be a #cybersecurity and #devsecops nightmare.
And yes I say this about male celebs as well, mostly cause Hollywood is just generally weird Af
I mean fair, but you have no idea how she is behind closed doors and away from the performances of the billion dollar brand she is lmao.
But you have proven my point, if people who follow the word of Christianity would hate the Maga crew, then it stands to reason that MAGA is using religion as a defence of their actions, not as a reflection of the religion. Therefore they are not real Christians.
I mean the principle that something or someone has to be real to be followed is dumb, we follow concepts all the time. We followed the theory of general relativity long before we had the tech to prove that the math actually mathed.
So you'd be ok with me basically calling all Muslims bin laden then?
Yeah I just don't subscribe to the idea of religious extremism, there's just extremism, whether they hide behind the Koran, the bible, the Gitas, they are all the same type of person.
That's a gross oversimplification and you know it. That lack of nuance is exactly the reason Trump and his pathetic lot get the airtime they did in the first place.
That suggests all Christians are Trump like, which is untrue. Reality is that Trump and his ilk are identical to those on the extremes of other faiths, freaks who use religion to hide their bigotry and atrocities.
Y'all really need a v for vendetta moment
Hey atleast I don't respond in 1 word lol.
Idk, it could take that many firearms to commit suicide for someone who doesn't have much between the ears.
Good cause they're a cop and you're one of those progressives or good because you're an antivaxxer? Doesn't change the fact you're praising the killing of someone but context is useful.
Palestinian statehood does mean that Israels war can be delgitimised more than it is now, take the W
They'll switch this position soon enough.
They have to do it at UNGA, which is in September
There was always a case for it, America just wasn't happy with it, and frankly the west needed America, now America has gone its own way, other countries don't need to bow down to it.
It won't stop it, but will delegitimise what Israel is doing, but so long as Mossad has the Pentagon in its pocket, they can do what they want.
About a third of your MPs are also asking for the same... In any case the English generally don't like it when the French do something first, hopefully this lights a fire under starmers desk.
That's great, what I am asking is the point of the statement you made above. Let's get to the linking of the left after I can at least make the link between increase in Gazan Population and threat to Israel.
Right so the definition I posted.
Are you stating that the increase in Gazan Population posed an existential threat to Israel?
And what definition is that, as far as I am aware there's only one definition which is The legal term “genocide” refers to certain acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.
If the latter is what you're saying then you're absolutely right.
I'm confused, perhaps I misread your original post, are you claiming the left engaged in a genocide of Jews? Or that the left condoned what Israel did pre October 7?
The actual discussion is whether or not social media is creating a mirage of relationships with these people/elites and whether people are conflating that with real life. No one on the Internet knows them, yet somehow believe they have a vested interest
It's not about the morality police or whatever you think, the only price they'll actually paying is with their respective spouses.
I mean it's not the responsibility of the chronically online to do that. Let it go viral for sure, but they'd pay the price within their social circle. Social media has just made people think their para social relationship to these people far closer than it actually is
Big call, what's your evidence.
I'm in tech, I'm fully aware of what a shitshow gen AI is from ethics to environment.... I just don't think we can regulate what others do.
Agree optics arent great - but late show format isnt exactly in their golden age - Colbert was the best of the lot, but its a dying breed in any case.
As much as I agree with your sentiment, who are you to prescribe what someone else can post.
I mean your president was found liable for rape, don't think consent is on the mind of your politicians at the highest level.
Congrats to the US for their slide into being China with worse healthcare (which is an impressive achievement)
Doubt it, tesla is still in the tank, but that's 95% because it was a shit car in the first place
Tax deductions reduce your income tax obligations, so let me ask you this... Would you rather this cash go to people who need it, or the government who clearly can't be trusted at all at the moment? I'd suggest starving the government of cash, then they can't function.
That requires engaging with them lol
Kicking them out doesn't eliminate them just means they'll go somewhere else, somewhere more amenable to their views. It's closer to appeasement than destruction. You destroy them by facing them head on.
Because, at best I might be able to change minds by positively engaging, at worst, I can make an example out of said nazi. I think in these cases, any shot, no matter how slim, we should take.
That's fine, but as a lefty, I would much rather hear the nazi and be able to push back, than have them sit in their own thought bubble reinforcing their ideals, and me sit on my own. So the answer is that be bat our eyes when a nazi walks into a bar, what we shouldn't do kick them out.
Let's be fair, that's nowhere near as clickable as an assassination or even an attempt.
The orange buffoon literally flagged his intentions in 2016. And y'all fell for it twice, as a nation.
If he wasn't intelligent enough to understand what the blimp was up to during the campaign, he's not intelligent enough to understand it now.
I don't believe she should shy away from it just because other women get hurt. At that point you're punishing her for the sins of men. Which I don't think is fair on her either.
But is it her responsibility to censor herself because of that? I can't claim to know Sabrina, but based on her style she certainly embraces her sexuality, and expresses it openly, and I think that's absolutely fine.
firefox is moving into AI space too on their last update
To be perfectly honest - Mozilla needs to stop expanding their range and go back to developing the Gecko engine. Chrome, Edge, Vivaldi have become so unbelievably bloated that I think a simplified firefox experience would actually give them a competitive advantage in the market.
At best a shadow minister gets 25% additional salary, depending on circumstances and justifications provided by the opposition leader. In the scheme of the machinations of government and shadow government, its not that huge.
For clarity every member of parliament is on a salary of 217k, plus allowances for travel etc. Those who hold ministerial portfolios (i.e. those in government) receive additional salary: maps.finance.gov.au/sites/defaul... Page 3 tells you what a shadow minister receives as an additional salary.
Assuming you're joking but for those who are actually confused by the coalition splitting: Ministers and shadow ministers can be from the reps or the senate, libs have 50 members of either reps or senate, they will have more than enough people to make a front bench
They're not that far from the rest from an aero perspective, they just have a good team setup.
1. If you look at a single lap pace, they're all pretty close together, especially in quali where everyone is on the fastest compound and attempting to hit every push lap perfectly 2. They have 2 really fast drivers who would walk into most other teams and be NO1 seat easily
They don't have a shot in the first place lmao, remember LNP finished third in the ballot behind the greens for the electorate of Canberra.... And had swings against them in the other 2 electorates. Tells you enough about their standing in Canberra
Marko was not successful as an F1 driver lol, he had 10 races, started 9 and scored a grand total of 0 points.
As much as I appreciate the sentiment, the answer is not to rollback entertainment events, it is to invest in science and technology to make things greener.
I mean my original post was meant as a joke, but it seems I fell prey to the Social Media thing of falling into an argument somehow lol.
That's great you hold that opinion, doesn't change the fact Trump was wrong in his post
Completely different factions of the liberals dude. Turnbull was centre right, Abbott is right. And why are we bringing Abbott into this?
Yeah but trump is more wrong than Turnbull, cause Australia didn't remove Turnbull, The liberal party of Australia did.
How we treat America vs how we treat Israel are very different... I agree, but we aren't comparing apples to apples here.
Because it takes a pretty long time to assess these kinds of things, build a profile and body of evidence. People don't switch loyalties like this overnight. And attending training overseas is common, it's how allied nations are trained in each other's procedures.
Fun fact, the Roman salute is not actually ancient Roman, it comes from the 1920s, when a certain Benito Mussolini was in power.
doge.gov
Idk he's looking pretty unbalanced to me.
And his face looks like he's missed it
He's POTUS 45 and POTUS 47 - here in aus if I had a Prime minister who served non consecutive terms they would only have 1 number cause it's the same person.