Mn gun owners caucus does not like being asked if they are for or against mentally ill people who want to harm children having access to guns that can kill dozens in seconds. Hint: they are very much for
A celebration of the quirks of South Minneapolis live from the boost mobile store. Transit enthusiast, shitty graphic design fan, militant pedestrian
177 followers 281 following 328 posts
view profile on Bluesky
Mn gun owners caucus does not like being asked if they are for or against mentally ill people who want to harm children having access to guns that can kill dozens in seconds. Hint: they are very much for
What happened to this guy’s chin? Why is he so chinless?
This is the MN Gun Owners Caucus’ official response to communities impact by school shootings? Wow. You have to know you’re an actively evil person, right? As you fight to arm the next school shooters
You’re trying to make it easier for a want to be school shooter to get the gun they’ll use to kill children? Got it.
A national gun ban would have prevented this. A ban on semi auto guns would have prevented this. What suggestion of yours would prevent this? Why doesn’t it happen in other countries on a daily basis like us?
When you stop crying, spiderman, use the full quote
Are you or are you not in favor or would be school shooters getting machine guns?
For mass what? How many mass shootings happened without guns?
You’re saying current gun laws do not go far enough to keep us safe? I completely agree
Use the full quote.
You’re in favor of bans on machine guns? Or in your ideal world would machine guns be easily accessible
Why didn’t you use the full quote, coward? “Someone calling you a coward for your refusing to defend your actions is not them being “violent” toward you. Grow up, baby. If you were less of a coward maybe you would not feel the need for a safety blanket all the time.”
Omg, someone called you a coward? That’s awful. You must have been terrified. Anyway, you should probably get back to making sure school shooters are allowed to get machine guns.
They are too cowardly to say yes or no. They know they are evil people.
Do you support mentally ill people who want to kill children having access to semi automatic weapons capable of killing dozens in seconds? Full stop?
And you want to arm all school shooters
What framing? I am telling you facts and and you are too cowardly to respond to them
Bullying is a significantly less important issue that mass shootings
And if they did not have access to a gun, no kids would have died. It’s the guns. Kids get bullied everywhere, we can work to fix that. Kids only get shot in places where guns are easily accessible. There is a reason bullied kids in the Uk don’t shoot up schools.
Seems like you are the one not realizing the guns are the essential element that enables school shooters to exist. Your life’s work is arming school shooters
Just to be clear: bullying did not kill those kids. A person with a gun did. We should focus on keeping guns out of people’s hands. The pope should refuse communion to Catholics who do not vote for gun conteol
Marketing tip: You guys should say “we have to kill this bill just like the school shooters we enable to be armed killed children”
Who is more likely to get us a light rail down one of hennepin/lyndale/nicollet?
Wow looks great
Can’t speak to Foundation but I finished WOT earlier this year. It was good and the final book was great but I would not reread. There were like 5 books in the middle that were boring but all ended so well that I kept at it
You are calling someone saying you are a coward “violence” while defending giving someone who wants to kill kids a semi automatic rifle and enough ammo to kill a neighborhood.
Rational behavior test: Are you for or against allowing mentally ill people who want to kill children having weapons that can kill dozens of kids in seconds?
Someone calling you a coward for your refusing to defend your actions is not them being “violent” toward you. Grow up, baby. If you were less of a coward maybe you would not feel the need for a safety blanket all the time.
If your answer was “no”. You would have said so. Clearly you support arming school shooters
Protecting the rights of school shooters you mean. Your entire life has been dedicated to making it easier for school shooters to murder children. You know that, which is why you are so embarrassed by your stances
There is not framing. I am reminding you what your actions enable and asking if you support it. And you, being a coward, cannot answer. That cowardice is probably why you love guns.
Seems a lot of things are hard for you to tell. For example: tell us if you support mentally ill people who want to kill children having access to guns which can kill dozens of kids in seconds. You have so far lacked the courage to answer.
Surely you see a moral difference between raising money to stop school shooters from getting guns and raising money to make it easier for school shooters to get guns.
But you did solicit donations to fund your efforts to make it easier for school shooters to get guns mere hours after the shooting.
Cool that school shootings make you laugh. Definitely beating the psychopath allegations. How many guns would you like a school shooter to have?
That’s not a rebuttal of sickos paying your bills. 2 hours after the shooting you solicited donations to fund lobbying efforts to make it easier for school shooters to get guns. Only sickos would do that.
Please share the data showing states with permit-less carry have lower per capita gun deaths. I can save you time, the opposite is true
it's not framing. It is reality. It is what happened. You are too big a coward to own your own beliefs
Should mentally ill people who want to shoot up a school be legally allowed to carry their gun to the school? Can you show me you are not a coward and give a yes or no?
Is your official stance that a mentally ill person who wants to kill children should be allowed to have access to guns capable of killing dozens in seconds? Yes or no. I can proudly say No. you are too much of a coward to say yes.
Make Minnesota Bigger
Speaking of not giving an inch: Is your official stance that a mentally ill person who want to kill children should be allowed to have access to guns capable of killing dozens in seconds? You don’t seem very proud of that position. You have been too big a coward to say “yes”
Standing on Lyndale I was shocked at how dark the greenway was. There must have been 5 lights out
Strong entry for best black eyed susan boulevard garden in kingfield
You keep avoiding answering: should a mentally ill person who wants to kill children be allowed to access guns like that?
It sounds like you think both are currently a great idea simultaneously. Why are you giving money to a racist org that supports school shooters?
So again, you don’t have any arguments against banning AR-15s. You just think we should also abolish the police
If not, have a reason not to ban semi auto guns that is not just a reason to abolish the police
Who mentioned opposing assault weapons bans? Your stance was banning semi auto guns and abolishing police.
The most extreme left democrats you can find. Definitely not a pro school shooting caucus
Gun control is literally the only way to stop mass shootings. So yes, being against gun control is being in favor of school shootings.
I think “cops are racist so we have to keep allowing kids to be gunned down at school” is the worst pro gun argument I have heard. It belongs in a museum
Make sure you only vote for and give money to groups that support both. So that’s means disavowing the racist and pro ar-15 gun owner’s caucus
Your example of “disastrous downsides” is the current reality with the public has to deal with racist cops. It sounds like you would be 100% on board with banning guns if we also disbanded the police. I can be convinced.
It is. All of their actions make it easier for a would be child murderer to get a gun
What are the “disastrous downsides”?
Then why do you support an organization whose main goal is to allow mentally ill aspiring child murderers to acquire guns? At a certain point, you are responsible for what you support
This is not an argument against banning AR-15s. This is an argument against the existence of the MPD
Do you believe that mentally ill people who want to kill children should be a able to acquire guns?
So ban possession of them too
You are the one saying your number 1 goal in life is to ensure that mentally ill people who want to kill children have access to guns that can kill dozens in seconds.
Minneapolis Zoning law suggestion after walking around lyndale ave last night: ban automative rated shops in on the 50 densest blocks in the city. Put auto shops in less walkable areas instead of worsening the most walkable areas
There is no individual right to own firearms in the constitution. There has never been. You cannot quote it because it does not exist
You’re not quoting it because you know it does not support your argument. There is no individual right to gun ownership.
Speaking of “no true scottsman”. Was this school shooter a responsible gun owner up til 8 am on Wednesday?
It isn’t. that’s why you cannot quote anything in the constitution that supports your stance.
These gun nuts can never answer if they think a mentally ill person who wants to kill children but has not committed a crime should be allowed to have guns. They know their position is insane.
#bumperstickersofMinneapolis
Bryan Strawser wants school shooters to have guns. He just does not want to made to feel responsible.
Your stance is that prior to the moment the shooter shot through the glass they were a “law abiding gun owner” and someone you would dedicate your life to giving access to guns?
Do you support people who want to shoot children having access to guns? Yes or no. Find your courage to answer.
You asked for donations on facebook 2 hours after the shooting. How much money have you made off this shooting?
There is no individual right to own firearms in the constitution. There has never been. You cannot quote it because it does not exist
Your entire life’s work has been dedicated to making it easier for mentally ill people who want to kill children to acquire guns capable of killing dozens in seconds. Are you not proud of that? Is so, please say that plainly. Don’t be a coward about what you do.
Are you for or against allowing people who want to murder children access to guns?
We 100% do, bronk
So then loudly say that you support allowing mentally unstable who want to kill children having access to weapons that can kill dozens of kids in seconds. Don’t be a coward. Say it
Byront, you’re a person. Who did you vote for for last fall for president?
Wow, you successfully made it so an angry 18 year old who wants to shoot up a school can do so? Congrats! You must be so proud of your contributions to humanity: dead children
What enables mass shooters to mass shoot? Hint: we don’t call them mass fist fighters
Who did you vote for for president last fall?
You’re going to let people that want to shoot up a school have Semi-Automatic firearms to do it?
I also don’t think we need to have kids die to protect a hobby. I love gardening. If basil was the leading cause of death for children, I would support banning it
Renaming a post office would have bipartisan support. It would not stop mass shootings. A national ban on semi auto guns would though.
Your entire life’s work has been dedicated to making it easier for mentally ill people who want to kill children to acquire guns capable of killing dozens in seconds. Are you not proud of that?
So you believe in gun restrictions for people who have committed no crime? Say that then.
Can you proudly say that you want mentally ill people who want to hurt children to have guns? Say that. Write it out here and hit post, coward.
Is Rob really so dumb that he thinks the US is the only country on earth with mental health issues? Did he vote for people who expand access to healthcare or people who cut it? Does he just like seeing children die? It is hard to argue no.
Not a single proposal you made would stop mass shootings. You want to make it easier for mentally ill people who want to harms kids to get guns.
Great morning for sunflower peeping
Doctors say “he died badly, like a dog”
Metro transit needs to up their merch game. I’ve got like 5 items from the DC metro store in my home right now and 0 from metro transit
Your offer is acceptable. No more professionally produced guns in the US.
I believe it is also related to him being a million years old and in terrible health with what doctors call “cheddar cheese arteries”
If he dies, we have to make the song “celebrate good times” trend number 1
Reports are that he shit himself to death
Extend the choo choo train in mall of america to uptown
Drafting an angry letter now!
Delaware is firmly mid atlantic. As is maryland. The south starts in virginia. I’m gonna fight about this.