oaky there's 2. I'm not an AI lol. I just googled that question wandering why you would ask this.
Pygame/Unity, C++, Cubase,Fl Studio,Ableton hip hop beats. Also mostly just random af opinions.
148 followers 343 following 904 posts
view profile on Bluesky
oaky there's 2. I'm not an AI lol. I just googled that question wandering why you would ask this.
7?
hmm I'm gonna need you to explain this to me sorry haha. Was my above point intelligible btw?
Else he'd be saying punch in the face. Either way this seems like an infringement of free speech. And no I don't agree or sympathise with any of his speech.
And like the phrase he used while de-contextualised is violent but the intent taken at face value while vile isn't really violent- like he's saying punch in the balls to make a point about his views on trans people not literally about punching people in the balls.
So hold up- anyone who says they want to 'punch someone in the balls' online can get 4 policeman arresting them? I think the guy's a whacky douchebag but this seems a little bit otp.
Because I don't think it works like that. There's a multiplicity of different opinions on different issues depending on where someone falls on an arbitrary scale. If that makes any sense.
It really is so cowardly and disgraceful how he acts. He hides behind appearing rational and level headed but he's actually insane and even evil.
A few independents and Greens.
Hard to argue with Ross Gittins. If Albanese plans to just sit on his huge majority without doing anything useful to address climate change, generational inequity, housing, tax rorts and plenty else, he should quit and bequeath the job to someone with the bottle. www.smh.com.au/business/the...
I think a cultural shift is better than enforcement through moderation. Maybe I'm unrealistic. But I agree with you this a genuinely important thing to be talking about.
Yeah I don't think it's a quantitative difference but qualitative.
You fail at logic.
So say you're 100% left. If someone who is 95% left then despite being 95 % the same is given the same kind of communication as someone who is 100% right wing?
Well they weren't bad for being civil they were bad for committing genocide. It doesn't discredit the benefits of civility.
You don't compromise your convictions by aligning with people you disagree with if it's under circumstances that assist in achieving a greater goal. And I think you falsely equivocate Dems and reps here. They both suck I agree. But there is a difference especially now.
What are all it's forms?
Yeah and I hate that shit. But I actually do think casual acceptance of incivility might be a more significant issue. And it is an issue that everyone can influence regardless of how many people will see a particular comment or post.
Yeah of course but this is still a digital public space and It's about general practice.
When people realise that online toxicity is something we all have a stake in addressing.
Like I reckon it's not so much whether it's needed but whether it might sometimes help.
Maybe it'd help to have more discretion in who you are nice to. Not being nice to people who are opposed to what you outline despite other differences maybe hinders your ability to address the current administration?
Would that make sense tactically if goal is to oppose the current administration?
Further loss of critically endangered African forest elephants due to the ivory trade will likely result in the continued decline of African ebony trees, suggests a newly discovered mutualistic relationship between the charismatic species described in #ScienceAdvances. https://scim.ag/4oVjHIY
Personally for some reason I'm really reluctant to block people. I don't quite no why but I reckon there is a culture online that casually accepts toxicity that should be called out.
I come from a country that has a totally different definition of liberal. Can you tell me what his shitty ideas are?(Genuine question).
I think trolling is an important part of the internet. But being a toxic cunt online should be called out for the gross behaviour it is. Basically I agree with this wholeheartedly but would swap the word troll with toxic idiotic cunt.
The problem is not the existence of a single bad-faith actor or even a handful - it’s the way these behaviors are either encouraged or penalized. If you let the ringleaders operate, they’re encouraged. Nuke the ringleaders and they’re penalized
What does asocial socialist mean?
Karl Marx would've hated most of the 'communists' in the 20th century. And I will argue that until the cows come home.
Yeah nah just been coding alot and kind of always end up here after i've goen loopy from coding too long haha. I think when I need to stop thinking about something because it's no logner productive I just say gibberish on here so I can think about my regret for saying something silly instead.
yes meant pre haha. Kind of a big difference between pre and post in that context.
I just looked it up and thirty years after the siege of Smerwick he was actually tried and executed partly because of his involvement in it. Although the most interesting aspect of his legacy is how he inspired Cromwell it should be said.
Fuck these mother fuckers seriously. Cormorants are fucking magical beings. Why don't people care? Why do they vote for this? Also sorry this video is dope btw. I'll stop replying to all your tweets now though haha. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iw1N...
Australia sucked post immigration. Not that I like Keating but he got it right when he said Australia was at a 'near on fatal dose of fogeyism' in the 50s. I mean it kind of sucks now but I don't know what these people think Australia was like pre-immigration but it would've been boring af.
Problem is that changes to the security council relies on the p5 supporting said changes making it near on impossible to actually reform :/ I think if anything these voting mechanisms show how damn powerful America was post ww2. They set it all up.
That might be completely wrong though and this is a kind of a vibes based take to be fair haha.
Like there was 1 poster at the NeoNazi group of Desi Freeman on the weekend. Which I guess is kind of good in a weird way because I don't see any police alliance emerging there. in fact not that I really give a shit but the police were very harsh on previous far right protests during covid I think.
To be honest i'm no so sure. I think that is a healthy instinct to be suspicious of police sympathies for the far right. But I think one of the outcomes of the last few years where the far right morphed with the sovereign citizen movement has kind of diffused any sympathies.
Well that's what we need. Some whole other thing that just like sidesteps everything and just says fuck the entire current paradigm.
Just don't blame it on the moonlight.
Where were the commies in the Spanish civil war?
And yet Anarchism has actually succeeded and achieved its goals for a brief period in the early 20th century. 'Communism' has not fulfilled any of its goals despite having decades to make it happen.
But being right and yet unpersuasive to 90% of people is pointless?
I find it weird how so many of these graphs place libertarianism and authoritarianism as opposite when they're sort of the same thing the way I see it. It was the Libertarians who brought Trump.
So where are you on this axis?
I've heard so much about the USA over the last few years that i've finally reached the point where I actually just don't give a fuck what happens to that bomb fuck of a country anymore. I actually hope things get worse there so that it stops being an important country.
To be fair the nitwits on here can't be reflective of society overall though? Just because 90% of political minded people are whack doesn't mean the 99% of people who aren't into political stuff think the same way. That's more of a question than a statement btw.
I've kind of quit fishing personally. And actually i'm planning on aerating this dam and stocking it with native fish which is a lot more fun and tbh I do feel guilty fishing unless it's a carp or sea urchin or something invasive.
They want to delude themselves into thinking they are experiencing a pretence akin to 'getting back to what men do' But I have never met a fisherman who isn't like the opposite of a Kalahari bushman.
But fuck whatever Labour's doing obviously.
And I reckon those who are partaking in this nonsense that aren't fascist(if there are any I dk the %s tbh) should be engaged with. I think it's a terrible idea to pretend like the misdirected anger towards migrants(while unjustified) isn't partly an expression of a confused but genuine frustration
I find it nonsensical how the same people who are upset about migration never say anything about their own government's role in creating it. I also find it strange that people on the left seem to ignore that it'd be better if people weren't forced to leave their homes in the first place.
While I take your point maybe just be happy he is speaking out. Condemning him like this for doing so simply keeps people from speaking even if basically true. I dk.
I just found who Walter Raleigh is. It begs the question if someone is a war criminal but also really charming are they still a war criminal? I think perhaps not.
I'm getting bloddy horny just thinking about.
And maybe for the sake of argument we can send ourselves extinct but we shouldn't drag down all other life with us.
human life is as valuable as algae.
Keep in mind this some inexpert opinions. If any climate experts can tell me where I'm wrong that'd be appreciated.
People generally accept adaption as the course ahead. But a hot house earth is an absolute extinction level event. In short I think it could be way worse than the currently farcical talks of 1.5-2.
And yet because of scientific uncertainty in mapping these dynamical systems this is never included in the models presented to the public. Like I say it was only in the last IPCC report that high risk scenarios were really even given attention.
Happens when there's a simultaneous Amazon collapse, nitrification of ocean, mass methane release etc. This is not an impossible scenario to occur within 100 years and would certainly lead to a hot house earth. The last time the earth had similar conditions it 14 degrees above what it is now.
To be clear I totally agree with you. But I won't be surprised if by 2100 it got to way way over any temperature currently predicted by mainstream science simply because they don't know what
The IPCC still largely plays down the most dangerous thing about climate change. Because it seems like up until this point temperature projection has been correctly predicted based of the co2 ppm etc. But the real scary part is the planetary dynamics between feedback.
While in general I completely agree. I actually think(and I might be wrong here and is a bit of a vibes based take) that the climate science has really failed when it comes to our understanding of feedback loops and the subsequent importance of conveying this aspect of climate change to the public.
Yes but not because it's being induced by people. And generally at much less rapid pace. But you're right it's changing and we will adapt because the previous for 4/5 mass extinctions caused by climate change give strong precedent that change is nothing to worry about.
Solar gravitational lens telescope.
Pure evil.
Thanks very much to the fucks at adobe who have made turning a PDF 90 degrees a paywalled add-on
Open a rival store and ruin them.
I still remember how fucking disgraceful that fish die off was a couple of years ago. And like why can't they capture any of those flood waters? I always wander that. But that's more an engineering question actually haha.
I mean the point of the environmental allocation is that it literally is not taking haha. But the whole water permits world is just corrupt. Barnaby Koyce in a drought stricken town hall meeting saying he cares next day lunch with Canadian multinationals agricorps getting all the water they need.
Maybe I'm reading into this wrong but there's something telling about how they couldn't understand any water allocation that didn't cohere to 'taking'. It's like for them an impossible concept that water allocation might involve simply leaving it in there.
While I dont think we know where AI will go I also dont think we understand what intelligence is. We can't even define what a thought is. And a child doesn't have to download the internet to speak fluently. Although the most obviously problematic thing is the privatised control of the technology.
I just use for some coding stuff and history summaries. Yesterday I asked for some fun facts. I learnt that 1977 was the final year in which France publicly executed someone with a guillotine. Fun facts like this is why Open AI is worth 500 Billion.
He just seems too silly to even be worth criticising. I assume he doesn't believe what he says and is probably just saying it because it happens to align with his economic interests. I kinda think it was better when people just ignored him.
A Tesseract animation(in Python) + VLC effects.
Okay I haven't used Unreal. I can definitely relate to modules being annoying though. Are you making it on your own?
Anyway it's why I follow people like you who aren't like this.
I've found the mix of moral certitude and lack of doubt an incredibly common type of person online. And it's a loathsome combination on many levels. And most people just decide what they want and then look for evidence to support it not the other way round.
Totally. I'm so sick of it tbh. I also think like being disrespectful online is just a really reprehensible thing to do. I've been guilty of being hostile online but increasingly I realise that we're all responsible for the healthiness of online spaces.
This brain implant can decode a person's internal chatter go.nature.com/4mKOMNH
How?
But also actually I want to ask. What do you think the origins of white racism and white supremacist beliefs are?
So you wouldn't have just left them alone in peace?
Alright because I appreciate the engagement. I hope i don't engage in bad faith. And if I am in an unconscious way then I apologise and hope to be made aware. I appreciate your cuntiness and don't really get offended by anything. I've already accepted my own idiocy haha
I guess my point is I reckon white people r jealous of Thai people who have an awesome culture and unique food etc. We ain't got shit. We victimised the world but in the process became atomised untethered by capital. I don't quite know what my point is here but white people like me have no heritage
I mean I come from the anonymous middle classes of Europe. My Granddad worked for the RAF as an engineer in ww2. My Grandma grew up under Nazi occupation in Bavaria. I don't any cultural roots I can point too.
I think I basically agree with this. Although I don't know a single white person and tbh I only know white people apart from my Chinese neighbours who hold white supremacy views. I feel like the 'until yt supremacy ends' is kind of an important qualifying statement.
How would you have done it?
hmm oppression isn't the same as the genocide that occurred during the founding of America. But yeah it's not-sensical to talk about all white people as being to blame. It also kind of misdiagnoses white supremacy and racisms' causes but I doubt you want to hear my views on that.
East Timor, the Uyghurs, Tibet, the Ukraine. THese are the first 4 that have come to mind and they're not really informed by Theocracy. But I agree religiosity can be blamed in other instances. Dk about 'most'
Nut you can look at plenty of examples around the world where indigenous extermination and genocide has occured and by your defintions continues to occur at the hands of non-white people.
Well for starters like what if someone is part white? throw them in the firing line? it's not practical. But which indigenous ppl? I assume you mean North Americans? Which pretty sure the entire US(obviously lead by white people) has failed those peoples. And i'm not sure 'continued' is correct.
I still can't get over how cool cells can be reaching out and interacting with one another! This depth shaded membrane marker gives us an idea of how dynamic these extensions can be! #FluorescenceFriday 🔬🧪
nah not that part. THe bit about exterminating all white people. I just find that kind of funny haha. To me it's just silly.
😆
I can't stop thinking about this study.
Sorry I was trying to get in on the irony.