You know. Those...deaths.
Data and word wrangler near the Salish Sound. Globalist Libtard. Reply Guy. (He, him, get over it)
1,190 followers 143 following 5,775 posts
view profile on Bluesky
You know. Those...deaths.
85% of stolen cars are recovered...35% on the day-of. Most likely, not totaled like this one.
I am not at all surprised the Trump can APPEAR to be so in person. Gullible might be a better description Jr. in this instance.
Cynicism is undermining us. And those theories are just one manifestation of that cynicism.
Yeah. "They" really should have lovingly embraced the candidate who offered the ethnic cleansing with better catering.
FWIW is routinely associated with those and other similar events. Great song...well-tuned for its era.
Buffalo Springfield recorded it in 1966. It went to #7 on the Billboard 100 in 1967. It was written about November 1966 protests against a curfew on Sunset Strip (Hollywood.)
Yeah. The AI did it!
Every little bit helps, no?
“Prophecy?” I’m pretty sure hubris, recklessness, chaos, and unaccountability were already well established in her time.
I’m afraid that white people droning “shame” are not going to save us.
What event are you referring to?
Wut? Do you have a reference to LBJ's attempted ban on the song and the SCOTUS "fight?"
Confusing age effects with cohort effects is a mistake.
um...neat.
What responsibility looks like.
Cities…blue cities in red states.
Truly a man for all four seasons.
Well, yes. Putting a a team of cops in every corner will tend to reduce street crime. This is not the science of rockets.
Yes, THAT'S what we should be emphasizing, not simply whether or not it is enforceable.
I prefer medical professionals who are partial to evidence-based practices.
The value (to MAGA) of the EO is not undermined by your finding it unconstitutional. It's purpose is to further undermine trust in our elections and provide political cover and direction to Red State officials who control red state elections
Impartiality is a only virtue in courtrooms and pie contests.
No. Actually coercing them to obey the EO would be the Constitutional violation. Blue states will ignore this one. Red States will volunteer...
Hey, they basically kicked off a comment with "the far left is as insufferable as the far right." Interpreting that as "the far left is as bad as the far right" may be a mistake, but probably not a lie. I think they both deserve a Bluesky Demerrit!
"Signed anonymously?"
I just did. I believe the triggering combo of letters is "Far anything is insufferable." It's right there in the lead-in. Some folks will have a hard time getting past that...and I can't really blame them these days.
What is the twuncy twast twiddler going on about? Wonder Bread and its equivalents are still widely available.
I noted for Harris and before her Biden and Clinton. Just fyi, sport.
Jesus…
The EO, itself isn’t “unconstitutional.” It’s just a piece of paper…but it’s a piece of paper that undermines faith in our elections and gives red-state officials political cover to exercise their state and local authority over their elections in a way that serves Trump.
Gaza was destroyed while Biden was still in office. But yeah. They should have lovingly embraced the candidate who offered ethnic cleansing with better catering. It’s really all their fault.
My pointing being…they aren’t Proud Boys or III-percenters, they are American LEOs, who we’ve been militarizing since 9-11. And Americans voted for an authoritarian 2024 because one 3rd of us are MAGA and another 3rd are cynical dopes.
They ARE cops. This is American policing on a bigger budget. This is what we made for ourselves.
A good money belt tucked in your pants does the trick.
Ask him “how many” then!
The world’s biggest proven petroleum reserves.
That is a testable hypothesis. Do it and report the results.
AI evangelicals and AI Luddites deserve each other.
High school is free.
Oh, c'mon! We don't need a WoQAnon.
Go back to Twitter.
Just take the L.
Would be a pretty heavy lift to charge non-cooperation as obstruction. Don’t see that happening. What WILL happen is Trump will flood Blue cities with federal officers and National Guard…and take away federal funding.
No. The Constitution is doing that work. In this case, the legitimacy of their actions is determined by the Constitution, not local ordinances.
They are correct…if the feds are performing legit, federally authorized duties.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
It’s pretty well established that state/local governments cannot interfere with federal officials performing federally authorized (constitutional) activities.
Correct. Unless a federal statute says otherwise
It’s pretty well-established that states cannot control or impede the legitimate exercise of federal authority — McCulloch v. Maryland (1819).
Ah. Yes, they must obey state and local laws, but they CAN ignore any local police ordinance (e.g. mandatory body cams) that interferes with their federal law enforcement role.
wut?
If your cynicism was justified, Kilmar would still be in El Salvador or would already be in Uganda.
At least locals will know when they are dealing with local LEOs
An example to keep in your back pocket: patrons in a small bar have an average and median net wealth of $10,000. (Half of them have $10,000 or less). Musk and a Buddhist monk walk into the bar. The average wealth is now in the billions, but the median is still $10,000.
MAGA occupies the White House, Congress, many State Houses, and governor mansions. The far left in American posts on social media.
That’s why median is a better measure of income distribution
Nope. Half of all households are at or below the median income. Musk earning more doesn’t change that half-way point.
That raises average income, not the median.
Pretty sure that should read “Medicaid”
Not really the historical hill to die on. Fvck Lee.
Wait until you hear about alcohol
What is a "public health epidemic"
France Libre
“Washington State revokes ICE access to driver’s license data.”
Thought, prayers, and ivermectin
And the recruits will be issued the best footwear.
"The Tom Clancy." Nope. Didn't work.
The reverse side of their Gadsden flag says "Tread on Them."
Yes. Some, if not all. It's still tax revenue.
Some practical evidence would be cool.
"I'm in Scandinavia..."
Um...Bernie actually does politics. Do that.
Oh, totally.
Thanks for the respectful convo, friend.
"Drop of a hat?" Describe one "dropped hat" that meaningfully changed the outcome of an election.
All this hand-ringing about the supposed Balkanization of Dem voters is also rather fatiguing...and counter productive. The "big tent" includes everyone who believes people should be treated with dignity...full stop. Let's embrace that.
I'm blocked from the original post and my comment, which characterized it as "tax revenue"
What a great moral booster!
Um…that’s why I called it a tax.
How is that wrong? How else does a tariff work?
Paid my American importers. It's an import tax. Import taxes paid to the treasury are tax revenue.
Okay. Thanks for the good-faith and respectful convo.
AI does not do "basics" well. To everyone's amusement and to the satisfaction of the AI Luddite community, it makes mistakes. But it can do complicated, yet tedious, things REALLY really fast...imperfectly, but fast. And that's okay. Interns are much slower and also imperfect. I check their work.
Wow. The North Korean applause at the end...
Okay. I'll leave it at "There IS revenue. American importers write checks to the treasury." Those checks are tax revenue.
Doing things faster isn't a technical solution, it is a gain in efficiency. If people are using AI to solve their technical problems, that not an AI issue, that's a people issue. AI doesn't make me worse at what I do, it makes me faster. As for collaboration...again, that's not AI's fault.
There IS revenue. American importers write checks to the treasury. But, yeah. A dividend check won't buy as much as it would would have pre-tariff.
The party of income redistribution
That’s not because of the words Dems supposedly use too much, tho.
They already think I’m driving a Soros-funded Antifa bus.
They aren’t moved by the “hypocrisy” argument. We need to move on from that.
I’ve found it useful for knocking ideas around, especially after the world moved to Zoom and I don’t have those of chats in the hallway anymore.
You’ve never bounced an idea around with someone less versed in your field?
They don't notice any tradeoffs between the material and the hot buttons. It's just the cultural war.
The judge gave them a timeline.
Human dignity is a single issue.
The "intellectual" version of the "cat litter boxes in school bathrooms" moral panic.
