It's honestly hard to tell, because the lack of makeup makes him look fucking weird all on its own.
Formerly AttackKitty. Calmer, more mindful, more demure; still ready to point out the folly of faux-leftism and its obvious parasocial relationship with MAGA.
288 followers 178 following 2,946 posts
view profile on Bluesky
It's honestly hard to tell, because the lack of makeup makes him look fucking weird all on its own.
Matt, I'm sorry to inform you that even though we only occasionally interact on here, we are obviously in a toxic parasocial relationship and codependent upon one another. I don't make the rules.
It's kind of weird how you all pretend any social relationship is "parasocial." It's almost like you all suffer some version of anti-social personality disorder or something.
It is @baphometboops.bsky.social 's birthday, and i just want everyone to understand that if it happens today you have him to thank.
I will definitely check them out some time!
Hey, he has to rationalize his rape fantasies somehow!
I'm not familiar, but may have to become so!
Also, the Bourne films are significantly better despite being poor adaptations (and barely even that) of the source material.
Imagine basically advocating for lynching and thinking you're smart (this of course is why that chucklefuck is putting so much effort into claiming he totally isn't advocating for the thing he's constantly advocating for).
James Bond films are incredibly overrated and mostly boring despite the often admittedly excellent set pieces.
Has anyone mentioned the "what if we dump all of Vermont's nuclear waste on Hispanics" bit yet?
Or, you know, don't. I think I've entertained this blithering nonsense long enough.
Tell you what, Mr. Academic: When you learn how to properly use colons and when you should instead use a semi-colon, come talk to me.
You do know it's possible to disagree with you and not be a Nazi, right? You allege to be an academic, but you post like a fucking middle schooler hopped up on adderall.
These are the people who think Robert Byrd never changed his views. They literally and explicitly do not believe people are capable of being better, which is the most nihilistic fucking thing imaginable.
Are you always this disingenuous, or are you just flirting?
Like my dude, the entire noble savage concept is predicated on "sure, they're backward and uncivilized but have you considered they're also better."
Are you under the impression that noble savage tropes do not generally come alongside noted defects to soften their introduction?
And then getting super mad when people point that out.
You seem to be confusing me and OP, here. And while I do not and will not speak for OP, I assure you I am not mad. I just think you're a white dude peddling noble savage tropes.
To be fair, I did not actually know he was the author at the time. Knowing it now makes the whole thing significantly more ridiculous even than I'd considered.
You fucking suck at communicating if you genuinely expect people not to take "hey what about this system, you racist white man" as presentation of said system as a model.
The paper you link to notes that the system you're praising treats women poorly, cupcake.
The literal fucking abstract outright notes that this system even at its best fails women and poorer people.
I think it's extremely silly to pretend anyone has claimed it doesn't.
I think the implicit assumption - which is not in fact an assumption at all - is that the person in office is the person their constituents wanted in office.
This is literally just pop psych self help bullshit trying to sound deep and intelligent. It's nonsense. It's what a stupid person thinks is smart.
Winning and not losing are, notably, the same fucking thing.
If you dumbasses stopped trying to force Schumer and Jeffries to own what Republicans do, maybe that would help make Republicans own what they do.
Honestly not sure what you're apologizing for! If it's pronoun related, I'm genderqueer and basically fine with any pronoun (I do tend to say I'm a man here both because I present masc and some assholes need to hear shit from a white man)
You're not "talking to" Gavin Newsom, dipshit. Unless you have some news, Mike?
First of all, go fuck yourself and second of all never stop.
Well, that's a pretty fucking dumb take.
Which, ironically, is basically rephrasing the criticism leveled at him but pretending it's a positive thing. Our media "elite" are the most fragile fucking people on earth not named Trump.
After pissing a bunch of people off because he lied, omitted facts, and got incredibly defensive over criticism to a frankly racist extent, Ali Velshi would like all of us to know our anger means he did his job well.
Good fucking God. I want a job where my performance is measured by pissing people off, that sounds super fucking easy.
Professional policing is a relatively recent concept, and it came about specifically to improve the unprofessional policing that came for centuries before.
He was so, so, so mad at all of us who pushed back.
Also blocked me. Nothing of value lost on my end.
She literally wanted to pay your down payment on a home, you stupid asshole.
Again: the DNC is the fundraising organization/arm of the Democratic Party. If you believe teh Democrats aren't communicating, I strongly urge you to scroll up, click on the OP's profile, and read her feed so that you stop thinking stupid shit.
Jesus Christ, Gavin Newsom is not going to sacrifice trans people (and to be clear: I'm speaking here AS a trans person). The other option quite fucking literally will, though, so if Newsom is the nominee (he won't be), I sincerely hope you decide to love your wife more than your ego.
"The Democrats shouldn't fundraise" is possibly one of the most unserious suggestions I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot of unserious shit.
Maybe don't speak for us, fucko.
I say this from the bottom of my heart as a trans person who is married to another trans person: Fuck. You.
They really do seem to have some kind of institutional inability to accept criticism with anything approaching grace. These people would die in a typical corporate performance review session.
You're not gonna believe this, but if you want Democrats to fight they do kind of need money. Yes, the emails and texts can be annoying; but if they're "pissing you off" maybe you should take a deep breath.
That might be because the DNC is a fundraising organization.
He is really, really not handling the pushback well. It's so obvious these people are not accustomed to Democrats actually fighting back on their bullshit reporting.
Achievement unlocked: blocked by Ali Velshi.
He'll block you shortly. He just blocked me.
Gazans THEMSELVES begged for anyone but Trump, because they knew Trump would give free rein to Trump. I don't consider not listening to the people actually suffering to be a sign of actually fucking caring about them.
Ali, if these people cared about Gazans or their fellow humans they would have voted for Harris or protested the literal rise of fascism. They didn't do either of those things, because they - and now you - are using genocide as a cudgel against perceived political enemies (and Jews).
Personally, I'd avoid telling a black woman to "create space for others' suffering." Especially in such a disgustingly dismissive fashion.
Like, stupid to such a degree that it literally stretches credulity?
"They protested the only person who could help them" Does that not strike you as fundamentally fucking stupid?
Man, I don't know how the hell you call yourself a journalist or news anchor when you still willfully pretend the protests about Gaza weren't primarily about "fuck Democrats" using Gaza as an excuse. Just willful fucking blindness, here.
Okay, fair. "Fuck the Jews" is a goalpost, I suppose.
Talking about how horrific the images out of Gaza was "confrontational" to you? Meanwhile, Trump and Jared Kushner even during the campaign were talking about what nice beachfront property it would make. Was she "confrontational" or just too uppity? Yeah, I'm asking.
This suggests Trump's approach was NOT confrontational, which is quite a thing to say.
The point here isn't "don't criticize" someone; it's that you and the media at large focused criticism on Harris and let Trump slide, and have done so for ten goddamned years. "Oh, we noted he... " No, fuck off. He said he would be a dictator - EXPLICITLY - and this wasn't a five alarm fire for you
Nothing has ever more swiftly convinced me that someone who is paid to know things does not know a goddamned thing about that for which he's allegedly paid. It was obvious from the onset that there was absolutely nothing that could be done to satisfy the protesters. They repeatedly moved goalposts.
Again, she was confirmed 50-48, w/ every Republican except Vance (wasn’t present) voting against her confirmation. Sinema didn’t vote but was an Independent at the time. Only Democrats voted for her. Another of Biden’s record 235 federal judges, shepherded through by Chuck Schumer, saving lives.
Please show your work for how you came to the 5% "certainty" here.
I don't know what the fuck kind of math you're using to come to this conclusion, and I strongly suspect neither do you.
Obviously, she hates the Legion for being a bunch of big mad incels as well.
I'm playing Fallout New Vegas, and Lily has decided to join me.
I'm not sure what you get out of being this stupid, but I wish you luck filling the empty void inside you.
"He didn't outright deny it, so that confirms it; also, if he'd outright denied it, that would have confirmed he's LYING and it's true!"
It’s perfectly valid that the House & Senate Minority Leaders & the 2026 DSCC Chair haven’t rushed to endorse a DSA candidate running for a local position, that is not federal, who has a voting track record that includes voting against a ban on ghost guns & cyber exploitation, with MONTHS to spare.
"don't exist" in these diseased hateful minds.
And then will come the third wave in which the same commenters from the 'first wave' get viscerally angry that you 'tricked' them into complimenting (and I am misgendering here only for the accuracy of the statements you'll see) men. Notably: this applies only to transwomen. Transmen, as always,
And in case people think you're lying, I would ask them to go post a picture of any moderately well known trans insta model or porn star basically anywhere on the internet and watch what happens. You'll get a first wave of admiration for how pretty she is, then a second wave of transphobic slurs.
I don't think posting on social media is "strong" in any sense of the word, cupcake.
I also like to tell people to learn how to properly use ellipses, so I suggest you work on that.
I made no claims save the illiteracy of your main account, honeybunch.
The worst part will be watching them equivocate in real time because they're flustered rather than telling whoever's asking to shove it up their own asshole because there was never any evidence of Biden health issues.
In what world is this not "going after" someone, Ali? bsky.app/profile/vels...
The post to which he's responding is literally calling him out by name, and his name is neither Chuck Schumer nor Hakeem Jeffries (and obviously not Kirsten Gillibrand).
Down-ballot Democrats barely exist in MSNBC coverage. Meanwhile Fox elevates every random GOP backbencher into a national figure. That’s a huge imbalance.
It's literally just "Correct the Record" all over again. Democrats campaigning is bad, exhibit number thousand.
Same dipshit tried to say I'm a child molester because when he called me, quote, a "pussyfuck" I congratulated him on his recent discovery of cursing in middle school.
The fact that whoever is typing these is now signing them "President DJT" instead of "Thank you for your attention.... " feels like a massive tell.
Spouse and I went to see Ghost last month, and two weeks ago saw In This Moment. I'm debating tickets for Avatar in November. Fuck the fascists, I'm not gonna let them take my metal away.
You should probably read my entire post, assuming you're capable (this is, notably, not an assumption I am prepared to actually make).
I'm one of those people who've never heard of "Netanjahu" and doesn't know what the fuck "ethnobationalism" is.
I'm certain you don't, and as evidence I submit that you're even calling it a "scandal."
First, do you smell toast? Second, OP didn't do that, so i suggest learning to read assuming you are not in fact currently suffering a stroke (as your spelling suggests you may be).
Indeed. So what the hell is your argument or whatever here?
So you consciously and willfully decide to imply people are child molesters for fun?
It'll be okay, little buddy. Becky won't go to the school dance with you and the spelling test may be hard next week, but I promise you'll get through it. Probably.
What do you think the words "all but calling" mean, exactly?
"Pussyfuck" I remember when I was in middle school and just learning that cursing was cool.
I'm not sure that person actually exists, frankly.
Literally no one is doing this, but a whole lot of people are taking "Newsom is doing something productive right now and we should support that" to mean a hell of a lot more than the statement actually says and then getting big mad about the imaginary other statement no one actually says.
Your unwillingness to read is not anyone else's problem to solve.
This post literally conflates "people committing genocide" with "all Jews" and I do not actually think you're too stupid to notice that (and to be clear, I think you're very stupid).
That took only about a dozen massive leaps of logic to get to, but sure why not.
The good news is you've found a way to shoehorn your definitely real and totally not performative concern into a discussion where it isn't particularly relevant.