Madness!
Heaven is full of paedophiles, rapists, and murderers. I think I’ll just go to hell.
231 followers 153 following 2,604 posts
view profile on Bluesky
Madness!
THIS is the thing that no one talks about. Just because they’re not deforesting in their own countries, doesn’t mean that they’re not driving deforestation.
You vegan?
It’s fantastic that so many perpetrators are being forced to refrain from harming their intended victims. We need the lone-star tick to spread globally!
This is exactly what you sound like to me… “Being pro-Palestine is like a religion, it’s fine for those who are against Israeli military killing Palestinians but shouldn’t be forced on anyone…including Israel; Israel should be allowed to do with Palestine what they want”
Bull…shit!! There are very few, to no medications that alpha-gal sufferers don’t have an alternative for. I’m not forcing it on you, the lone-star tick is and I’m LOVING IT!! 😂🤣🤣
Bring on the lone-star tick!!! Every…single…time…that one of you twats are prevented from exploiting and harming animals, I LAUGH AND REVEL IN IT!! And I will continue to, every time I see a new headline showing an increase in alpha-gal cases 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Let me put this in perhaps a way that you’ll understand… If Israeli weapons started jamming, preventing Palestinians from being exploited and killed, would you not revel in it?!? Looking through your timeline, you’re thrilled at the prospect of perpetrating harm; the piece of shit here is…you Sam
I stand by what I said
Psychopathy run in the family then?
Oh come on! The vast majority of people are more than happy to exploit and to advocate for exploitation, when they’re the beneficiaries of the consequences. You can’t end the cycle when you actively and happily participate in exploitation.
If you wouldn't press the button, why pay for someone else to? 🥺 👉 Begin your vegan journey: https://challenge.veganfta.com/starter_kit 💚 🎥: VeganFTA x vegan_bea (IG) Credit: farmtransparencyproject and animalliberationorg (IG) #eggs #freerangeeggs #veganism #veganactivist #vegan
False, people care about how the process makes them feel, they don’t care about the victim at all… Do you think that giving a child candy before you punch them, would make you a better person than someone who just outright punches a child?…“but I ‘care’ about the child”
Wefarism is a load of bullshit designed to make people feel better about morally bankrupt actions they take. Giving a child candy before you punch them, doesn’t make you a better person than someone who just punches them.
You vegan?
I don’t know how much that would help, the majority of climate activists don’t even take climate change seriously. It’s not like veganism is pervasive amongst their ranks.
You vegan?
You vegan?
You vegan?
Oh that idiot. He couldn’t understand simple proportion maths, within papers I presented, that proved veganism is the best for both the environment and climate.
…I mean a “loud angry minority” is literally how the Abolition, Suffrage, Civil Rights, LGBT, etc. movements all started.
It is, multiple studies have shown that a plant-based diet is cheaper than an omnivore diet…do you want the research evidence?
Bullshit again, there is no universal histamine intolerance to all plant proteins. Peas, chickpeas, and lentils, are low histamine; with the latter two containing DAO (which degrade histamines)
Fantastic! The more people who get alpha gal, the better! Thanks for making me smile nytimes
It’s fantastic!, they need to spread across the globe
Exactly how I feel! Go lonestar ticks, go!
Hahaha, bullshit!!!
Fantastic! The more people get bitten, the better! It makes me smile every time I see more and more people get alpha gal. Your “MiLk tHo” argument is idiotic; you act as if lactose intolerance isn’t a reality for the majority of people around the world.
Fantastic! We need more
The imbecile has been relentlessly trying and failing hard, to prove that veganism doesn’t have the least environmentally and climate damaging impact. It looks as though they don’t understand simple math and can’t read scientific papers. I’ve muted them so they can jerk off to their reflection.
Now I’m really done. It’s clear you struggle to understand proportions. It’s like talking to an infant. You’re embarrassing yourself. To help you along in future…learn why 1 of 100 is a greater proportion of the whole than 1 of 1000.
You, you don’t understand what the last sentence is suggesting 🤣🤣🤣 You’re an imbecile.
No, you literally didn’t and I showed you that you didn’t; you have a mental illness.
I’m done. You’re a moron. I doubt you’ve even read the paper and I certainly doubt you would understand it if you did.
A blog, is not a credible source of information; you moron, no matter who authors it. You’re literally pulling an appeal to authority fallacy. Show me the peer-reviewed paper proving that veganism doesn’t have the least impact on environment and climate.
Have you even read this paper?!? 🤣🤣🤣 Of course the transport proportion of plants is going to be the greatest portion of emissions..when the emissions of production are so godamn low! It literally says that veganism has the least impact. Here’s the conclusion for you, since you struggle to read
It doesn’t mention veganism specifically by name, but it does make it absolutely clear that plant-based diets are superior with regards to least impact on climate and environment, you imbecile. If anyone has a mental illness, it’s you.
Why are you sending studies on the impact of UPF’s on health?!?! This is proof you’re just googling.
You couldn’t even make it the conclusion… “In conclusion, 100% plant-based diet (e.g., vegan) has the least environmental impact.”
I don’t give a shit. You can try to pull an appeal to authority fallacy, but it just shows that you’re full of shit. Provide actual papers showing that veganism is not the least environmentally and climate damaging diet…because the scientific consensus is clear that it is.
This paper is on the “political ecology of food ethics” not climate and environmental inspect, you imbecile. Are you just googling for papers now? 🤣🤣
Hahaha 🤣🤣 The Poore and Nemecek paper is THE go to paper showing major reductions in environmental impact when animal products are removed from diets. The fact that you don’t know this, tells me all I need to know about your scientific literacy.
Veganism has the largest impact…but you’re right, I’ll switch to flying on holiday 4 times, instead of 5 times, you climate nutjob
Did, did you just read the abstract?!? 🤣🤣 Which diet does it say is the most sustainable…I’ll leave you to read the whole paper
A BLOG?!?!! I thought you were a man of science? 🤣🤣
That’s not a study, it’s a puff piece 🤣🤣🤣
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
mdpi-res.com/d_attachment...
You know what else is widely and consistently well-established? The vegan (those you think have a mental illness) diet is the least climate and environmentally damaging diet… mdpi-res.com/d_attachment...
Clearly you don’t believe in science. I mean you just suggested that those who follow a diet consistently found, by multiple systematic reviews and empirical studies, to have the lowest GHG emissions; land use; and water use…should be considered to have a mental illness.
Same with climate and environmental activists.
Hahahaha 🤣🤣🤣 “healthier” and insulating them from the world…explain Varroa mite. Tell us why beekeepers wear suits and use smoke if bees “don’t give a shit”. You’re an ignorant imbecile, go learn something before mouthing off.
…thanks for proving my point, they’ll obviously still be competing for pollen
It literally IS, this is why they’ve tried to come up with shit that mimics the food that they would otherwise have had, if not taken from them. The very definition of exploitation. “I feed and house my slaves, therefore they aren’t exploited” - Hazel
Wait, do you think that those bees are left alone, that the honey they work for isn’t taken from them?!? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 You imbecile, perhaps you should learn a thing or two about the honey industry before you mouth off.
On top of that, farmers use pesticides outside of the times that they rent the beekeepers’ exploited bees. Native bees aren’t moved away from the to-be-poisoned fields like rented bees and they don’t get the luxury of a warning.
No, it says it “could” but the likelihood of that would be low, considering that the reason the bees are exploited in the first place, is to pollinate. If they’re not pollinating because they don’t need to, beekeepers won’t get paid.
Here’s a prediction: I predict that if we stopped breeding and exploiting animals, we’d be far less likely to suffer outbreaks of zoonotic diseases.
The Alan Savory bullshit machine.
Still here? I’m disappointed. I put too much faith in the idea that you were intellectually capable of at least understanding the letter ‘X’. Your intellectual trammel must be the result of the ketamine that you and your daddy Elon love so much. It explains why you two think alike.
Douche, you’re on the wrong social. I know it’s difficult for you to understand because you have the intellectual capacity of bleached mould, but it’s the one that looks like a big ‘X’, hope this helps.
You seem upset by the fact that you’re exactly like Elon Musk…minus the money, of course. I’m sorry (not really) that facts have hurt your feelings.
Talking just like Elon…must mean you’re a musky douche as well!
You’re definitely on the wrong social, go back to your favourite person Elon Musk’s social. You fit right in there.
Lions and tigers don’t use electronic equipment to communicate, perhaps you should STFU and get off the internet if you’re so bent on comparing yourself with them.
No you imbecile. I’m equating movements for the emancipation of exploitation. That you struggle to grasp this fact is EXACTLY why you belong on Musk’s misinformation station. You share the intellectual capacity of those on that platform.
“Keep telling me how you trying to push anti-slavery or women’s rights on others is in any way different from religious activists doing the same damned thing?” - elonsamuskydouche
Yeah, your take is as thick as saying that slave emancipation or women’s suffrage is a religion…you talk just like MAGA, run on back to your daddy, Elon Musk; the other intellectually challenged individuals on his misinformation station are more your ilk.
What an idiotic take. This is as stupid as saying, the Emancipation or Suffrage movements are no different from religions. You’re no different from Elon Musk…go back to his misinformation station, you belong there with his tribe of anti-vegans.
What inconsistent imbeciles…isn’t the whole bro-culture, manosphere, shtick about fearlessness? Not caring what others think? Etc, etc. Today’s “masculinity” is built around harming and exploiting the defenceless.
The vast majority of Americans support and advocate for exploitation.
Sure, which is why the distinction between moral obligation and virtue. You’re morally accountable for your own actions (including those you’d have someone do for you), and have an obligation to refrain from harm. You’re not morally responsible for harm others do, but are virtuous if you prevent it
Rather than viewing it as something that one should reduce, look at it as something that one should refrain from causing. One has a moral obligation not to cause harm. Reducing or preventing harm, is a moral virtue.
There’s a reason the UK is in the bottom 7% of the world biodiversity index.
True, which is why it’s so daft to experiment on animals and think we can extrapolate the results to effect in humans.
And 94% of animal tested products fail human trials… If animals are similar to us, then they should have the same rights as us. If they're not similar to us, then what value is there of testing on them? The answer in either scenario is that “animal tests must be banned”.
Tell me, how does someone who “teaches philosophy part-time”, morally justify exploitation?
Plant based products will continue to get better, but I'm not convinced the issue is really the ingredients list. It's disinformation. And a culture of insecure men clinging to traditions of dominance and power.
Must be nice to live in a world where you attempt to switch context and cry foul when you’re snapped back. Show me evidence that an omnivore diet is more environmentally efficient than a herbivorous diet…environment (gRaSs-FeD tHo) is, after all, the full context within which you made this claim
I mean, this is the claim that you’re making. You’re the one pretending we don’t live in the 21st century, throwing out the “BiOLoGy tHo” trope. All this…and you still failed to show that an omnivorous diet is more efficient than a herbivorous diet.
If it’s a “Well known fact”, you should be able to provide the papers that haven’t been published.
…and you still haven’t provided the research papers for those “single studies” that you claim haven’t been published. Show us the papers you say haven’t been published.
Show me the papers that haven’t been published. You made a positive claim, show them.
Again, that means that 80% don’t 🤣🤣🤣 that’s 4 out of 5 papers.
Again, you haven’t provided the papers that have a “negative” result, that haven’t been published. You claimed they haven’t been published. Show us these papers that haven’t been published…or was it just ‘conjecture’ on your part? 20%, the antithesis of which is that…80% aren’t.
Said “biomass” requires calories of its own. An omnivorous diet is far less environmentally efficient than a herbivorous diet, and far more environmentally damaging. This is a well established scientific fact. I don’t need duckweed. You can stop pretending you don’t live in the 21st century.
What a shame that the rest of nature was razed for pasture.
I feel this exact way about fossil fuel usage, except I believe I can increase my usage to match everyone else’s.
Since when is pastureland considered a “nature reserve”?!?
Ecological scientists have often made errors or oversimplifications, especially regarding behavioural and non-morphological traits. This is well known to be understudied, even more so in birds.
…they studied particular traits. History is fraught with evidence of people who thought they knew would “likely be impacted” and got it wrong; many, many times. But in a field, where research is minimal to the point of being non-existent, you think they got it 100% correct.
I mean, if you take it down to basic grassroots biology and trophic levels, which is more abundant in any healthy ecosystem, carnivore, omnivore, or herbivore? Based just on our known impact, which is earth more likely to sustain 9 billion omnivores or 9 billion herbivores?
B12 is made by archaea and bacteria. Besides labs, it can be obtained from plants. You were particularly banging on about efficiency. We can get into the “wonderful world” of the fishing industry but I’d first like you to prove your premise that omnivore is more efficient than plant-based.
Again…not in the field of ecology and evolution. Try again. bsky.app/profile/damn...
Except that it doesn’t, because the papers you provided focus on biomedical research. There’s no disincentive not to publish “negative” (whatever you believe this means) studies in the field of ecology. Once again…80% of ecology studies don’t show bias. bsky.app/profile/damn...
No, you made the claim, the burden of proof is on you. It’s not my responsibility to prove your position.
