Which particular human right do you feel so put out by that you want to lose?
Drummer for @tremoursmusic.bsky.social Endorsed by Paiste Cymbals, Vater Drumsticks LA via Portsmouth (Still don't forgive Greg LeMond for 1989) Listen: soundcloud.com/GlennFryatt IG: instagram.com/glennfryatt YT: youtube.com/@GlennFryatt
273 followers 302 following 864 posts
view profile on Bluesky
Which particular human right do you feel so put out by that you want to lose?
Very happy with Chaplin coming back. Now if we can just go and get Kuhl and Beresford back we'll be properly on our way. #Pompey
I was actually jealous of the weather watching it! I would kill for some swirling drizzle.
We're missing a proper creative midfielder to play off Segecic and we're massively missing that bit of steel and needle. Second half was a slog but 3 points are 3 points.
Hmmmm.
Not pretty, we're missing that creative spark but grinding it out.
It was a nightmare to play at with the stage squeezed in the far corner. Was an alright pub though. It always makes me think of Radio Victory.
It's their name. American football has nothing to do with football but that's its name 🤷
Wrong
You know why Americans are so uptight? They don't have squash over here. No Ribena, no Robinsons not even that filth that is Vimto. Disgraceful.
Thank you to BBC Radio 4 Today programme for someone FINALLY holding Reform to account. We need more of this. Reform simply do not have a clue. As soon as they are asked any probing questions and asked for facts it is evident that they are just making things up. Reform are full of hot air.
Cool, that's not what the OP is saying, have a good evening.
Right, I don't think you're quite grasping what the OP is talking about...it's not about people not being put on a rota...
I'm sorry but not being paid for work is not "perfectly normal". It is also not legal in California: www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/faq_pay...
That's illegal if you're in the UK and on a contract that isn't zero hours.
Right. But what's the point? It's a meaningless statistic. Goals are what count.
Don't want to be that old bloke but seriously, what is bloody xG and why should we care?
I'm liking Le Roux. Just gives us a bit of a better shape.
It's a rather ironic surname
Get a grip
That's harsh as fuck. Her husband has just died, get a grip.
I'm a musician and he does have a point.
If he wasn't being a primadonna I'm sure he would be!
Reading between the lines I think Mous said he wanted Ritchie but Ritchie was demanding guaranteed playing time.
Tell me about it. It's a bloody 4.30am kick off over here!
He literally is...what are you doing?
I'm a migrant, want to say something? I guarantee that I have contributed more to the UK economy in my life than yourself. Have you ever even left the UK?
Do you stand on street corners, shouting at passing cars?
No they haven't. Per head of population the UK ranks 17th in Europe for asylum seekers and immigrants. In real terms 5th. Get a fucking grip and learn some facts instead of regurgitation Daily Mail lies.
That is illegal under international law. A law that was written BY THE UK! People have a right to escape persecution and claim asylum, one day you may have to claim asylum and you will have the right to do so.
Says the Daily Mail reader. Funny how it was all Labour's fault for 14 years when the Tories were in but as soon as they got booted out everything is suddenly Labour's fault. Wake up you moron.
...no "they don't." People seeking asylum are not allowed to work, they are not allowed to rent private housing, they are not allowed to claim benefits. Unlike yourself. You don't look like you've worked a day in your life and I can guarantee you are on benefits.
The Tories crashed the economy pretty successfully. We are nowhere near a Great Depression. Put down the Daily Mail and go and pick up your prescription.
I live in the US. I don't think you are quite prepared for what a Kasier Permanente run NHS will actually be like. When you live in a country without the NHS you appreciate just how special it is. Reform WILL cut taxes...for the rich. Reform brought Brexit, what a success that hasn't been.
He's not wrong though
Do YOur oWn ReSEarch = I don't have a clue what I'm talking about and can't back up my ridiculous statements with facts while supporting an actual felon. You're in a cult.
You've gone too far Neil...too far!
If Taco is riding it I will gladly put money on him and watch him win from a 150km breakaway.
Haha! That's impressive 🤣
The Tories crashed the economy over 14 years. I hope you were critical of their mis-management of the economy. Reform's economic policies would see the collapse of councils and the NHS, steep tax rises for all but the super rich and privatisation of the whole state apparatus.
Not funded by Labour, funded by the state. The UK does not have 'open borders'. Asylum seekers are allowed to enter a border without documentation and claim asylum as per 1951 UN Refugee Convention & its 1967 Protocol that the UK is a signatory of Asylum seekers do not receive welfare benefits
They're not in lemonade...
Why? It's up to them what they do. You don't HAVE to buy it you know.
That as maybe but Stalin is a bit of a stretch.
Calm down
Bless him, he blocked me...not sure why...
Why?
Put. The. Bong. Down.
Why?
I've lived in the USA for 12 years. You are a paranoid mess with delusions of grandeur.
NURSE!
Mate, shut up! You're not in Matrix, grow up.
*don't have
What on earth are on you on about?
The WHOLE west coast. You have lived and experienced the WHOLE west coast and you found it all "corrupt." No corruption in the whole rest of the USA? Interesting.
Why?
Ypur?
Why?
Mate, you really are babbling some complete nonsense you realise that?
Why?
why?
The biscuit that never really caught on
Pompey, making Saturdays unnecessarily stressful in the last 10 minutes since 1898 #pompey
Only the first game of the season but Bianchini is going to have people on his back of her doesn't find form. There's a player in there but he looks so short on confidence.
It will and I don't think the UK, society and institutions such as the NHS would recover.
Haha! Pleasure x
I took all my winnings from my Tour de France bets and put it on us finishing top 6...so hopefully I haven't just cursed it!!
bsky.app/profile/port...
We need PR. FPTP only works for two parties, when there are more than two parties FPTP is not a truly democratic voting system.
It does, just need Pompey to actually use their account!
See my original comment
My original point is...the Online Safety Act 2023 is not a law that is attributed to Keir Starmer.
You joined the conversation. Please refer to my original point.
It is not "Keir Starmer's law" as the original post proposed and many people are claiming.
So you agree then? The Online Safety Act 2023 is not Keir Starmer's law?
You are correct, you seem to think, contrary to all evidence and facts that a bill that was not introduced by him was actually in fact Keir Starmer's law.
Apparently you don't
I couldn't care less if Keir Starmer danced outside in a dress singing how he loved the Act (it is no longer a bill), he didn't introduce the bill, he did not frame the bill, he was not PM when it passed into law. It's not his law. I am not a Keir Starmer fan, simply stating it's not his Act.
I have done. The bill was introduced to Parliament by two Conservatives. The bill was official Conservative Party policy. The bill was passed into law by a Conservative government. It is not Keir Starmer's law.
The point I am making is...the Online Safety Act 2023 is not Keir Starmer's law.
Keir Starmer did not introduce the bill. Keir Starmer was not PM when the bill passed. Keir Starmer did not command a Parliamentary majority to even make the bill law but somehow it's Keir Starmer's Act? Please explain.
They are facts I'm afraid.
It is a law introduced by and passed by the Conservatives. To say it is Keir Starmer's law is incorrect.
I was simply asking you why you thought it should be repealed.
Michelle Donelan, former Conservative Secretary of State for Science, Innovation & Technology and Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, Conservative peer were responsible for introducing the bill that is now the Online Safety Act 2023.
Bluesky was created by Twitter.
Any MP can introduce a bill. What part or the Act do you find so repugnant?
*repeal
We have a Parliamentary democracy. The PM cannot introduce or repeat laws themselves.
The Online Safety Act 2023...was Keir Starmer PM in 2023?
Bluesky was created by who?
That as may be. The Online Safety Act 2023 is a Tory introduced legislation that was voted in by a Tory government.
The Act has only just come into effect. Please see an amendment to the Act: Draft Online Safety Act 2023 (Category 1, Category 2A and Category 2B Threshold Conditions) Regulations 2025, chiefly clarifying what is to be protected. Again, it was an Act introduced and voted through by a Tory gov.
That as maybe. The Act was introduced and voted through by the Tories. It is indeed in the gift of Labour to repeal or amend the Act but it is a piece of Tory legislation.
I am not defending the act in any way shape or form.
I am playing devil's advocate for everyone saying it is a Labour law. It is not. It was introduced by the Tories and signed into law by a Tory government.
The Online Safety Act 2023 was not about defeating fascism. It was primarily introduced with the intention of protecting minors. Also people having a go at Labour for bringing this law in should maybe read the date at the end of the Act's name...
Once a Scummer, always a Scummer.
If I was Lipowitz I would be off.
20%?! I wish!!