Yet with less reactors then the previous record year. Expect the capacity to grown constantly this and next year.
Interrested in many subjects with facts in them. Netzero progress.
180 followers 253 following 3,671 posts
view profile on Bluesky
Yet with less reactors then the previous record year. Expect the capacity to grown constantly this and next year.
You are misinformed.
Those islands have been canceled or halted for many years. The cost of cennecting the windparks have been overwhelming and Russian sabotage concerns. It will take longer to build We aren't building new gasplants, except Germany and Belgium as they shut down all or part of there nuclear reactors
1 tonne Uran ersetzt 1M Tonnen gas oder 3M Tonnen Kohle. Zu Perspektive. Es werden auch ersetzt-resourcen ausgebaut von andere Uran-LΓ€nder. Auch neu ist das Sweden da zu kommt.
Www.world-nuclear-news.org
Fast jedes Land, das nicht deutsland ist wirt neu Kernkraftwerke bauen. China allein fΓΌgt 10 schon neue Reaktor bauen jedes Jahr zu. Das nicht alleine fΓΌr ElektrizitΓ€t, auch fΓΌr hoch Temperatur im Industrie.
Another operating extension for graphite moderated reactors in the UK. The graphite blocks are in better shape then anticipated. Last shorter then PWR It will offset a drop in sustainable energy with another year. UK has lagged in replacing nuclea. www.bbc.com/news/article...
βοΈ #Palisades just made U.S. #nuclear history: the first plant to move from decommissioning back to operations π. With NRC approval, itβs set to restart in 2025 β‘ and could run to 2051, proving even βretiredβ reactors can return as clean power anchors π.
Poland's distinct line. βPoland to build Europeβs first of its kind small-scale nuclear power plant in WΕocΕawekβ www.euronews.com/green/2025/0... βPoland's renewable power surpasses coal for the first timeβ newseu.cgtn.com/news/2025-08...
World nuclear performance report came out today: Highest production of electricity recorded, next to district-heating. Small presentation and linked report here: youtu.be/07AXXte2RmE?...
Dump?
A shame these people pretent to be for nuclear, while they know it is a banned energy source in NZ.
Keep the nuclear plants, running longer. Don't tax them extra, make more revenue and build up a fΓΌnf for the eventual de commission when there in there 60-80 or 100th year of operation.
Nuclear energy is sustainable energy.
There are restriction on how and when they are accounted for under the taxonomy.
Nuclear of course is. Gas not of course, its been added as a deal towards the anti-nuclear countries, that need gasplants as a step-in.
Not planned, but forced. California has to find New location for nuclear plants Decreasing gasplants and dirty import of electricity.
Fear is never a good decision maker. 3 locations are considered for this non-fossil energy production.
Renewables is a gimic word.
Very deep and rough seas. Japan is adding more of everything: Geothermal, Nuclear, solar, hydro.
Nuclear is good as per Finland, where this is done in there district heating systems of the example with a sand battery.
"The Swedish government has announced a draft law that proposes amendments to the Environmental Code and the Minerals Act that would allow the extraction of uranium in the country. The legislative amendments are proposed to enter into force on 1 January 2026." #Nuclear #News [β¦]
They don't really care about it or are so highly misinformed by others.
This also catering the fearmongering. I guess it's needed and helps the municipalities with some more economic benefits. It's long overdue that existing and new reactor come online in Japan.
It is in my country, where a new connection can only be done with an upgrade, that take a year now.
Yes, but that's a mitigation and is a cost of investment. The grid infrastructure has higher requirements then that. There is no free lunch so to say.
That's a personal note, I'm not saying it's not useful. But you also shows cost on a small scale, on a grid And doesn't remover the critics I have on the total system, when a source has high peak production frequency. Ps: didn't not note the secondary capacity needed, for a production mismatch.
Important yes, but also adding more cost and much more work indirectly/directly. With grid capacity increases, which take time. And take space from the grid away for other sources and consumption (by companies mostly). Grids get full, because of the peak production.
Don't trust these prices. Lcoe is already a wrong approach for grid prices. And contracts for supplying haven't been signed.
Lcoe is already a wrong approach for grid costs. I don't see how they can build a price when there aren't any contracts for production yet.
Poland's first small modular reactor is to be constructed in WΕocΕawek, Orlen has announced. The site decision was announced as the state-owned power firm and Synthos Green Energy agreed on the operating model of their joint venture to build & operate SMRs. www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/sit...
Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power has signed an agreement with Zimbabwe's Centre for Education, Innovation Research and Development to cooperate on a preliminary feasibility study for the deployment of a Korean-designed SMR in the southern African country. www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/zim...
The operator of the Rooppur nuclear power plant in Bangladesh is committed to taking all steps to ensure the successful transition from commissioning to operations, a team of International Atomic Energy Agency experts has said. www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/iae...
This would have been a beautiful map had it not depicted the scope of Russia's sabotage on European infrastructure 2018-2025. Take your time and decipher it. From this report: www.iiss.org/research-pap...
It's a victory, but it won't cause a restart today π
Thx for being as terrible for the enviroment and the climate as the fossil proponents!
www.whatisnuclear.com is a good place to educate yourself.
How do you come up with these silly ideas.
It is already extended even before the hype of AI. Its sustainable electricity for California.
I provide you how it had been going, you provide an opinion, so that is a pov. If you really want to see what happened look into the data the NRC has.
That comment is ignorance. Nuclear is a sustainable energy source and it provides. The challenges for clean energy (including electricity) are gigantic. Ps: doubled it for saving, as facts often get blocked.
Opinion piece, about a transformer fire, that can happen at any high voltage switchyard and is anticipated for This is fearmongering, not journalism.
First years in a water basin. After that in the USA there stored dry cask, rated to keep them for over a century. While politician can argue about nimby issues. There is one permanent storage facility, I think that is only for military sources. Ps: Finland has a permant site for commercial fuel.
No, in the USA reactors simply all got a first license of 40yrs. After that a ten or twenty Yr renewal is being licensed. Upgrades are installed etc. Reactors are getting this towards 80 years in total now.
Nonsense, this is fearmongering.
Ignorant of what is already done and recycling and some of the storage facilities.
Nuclear energy is sustainable energy: electricity and heat, maybe some district heating?
Ad-hominen, we could do with less. Have a nice day.
No that's not how the license works. And reactors have upgrades trough there lifetime A quake is not an un- anticipated point. It is fearmongering you do imho. A shame you spend your energy on negativity.
It wasnt
bsky.app/profile/gp5....
Holding up nuclear has been done for decades, look at the situation we are in. Anti-nuclear groups are Anti-climate
What I was focusing on us, what do we think of as cost or benefits. Do we care about nothing then monetary value. I think not, cheap is a figurative assumption imho.
Not a limit, just a period. And it was 40 years. Then a renewal of a decade or 2. Today reactor get license periods that take to 80 years, very likely some will get to 100. I'm sry your stuck in the anti-nuclear talking points
Yes, people were mostly uneducated, not so much against it.
Your opinion is voided. The NRC has licensed and was still licensensing the 2 reactors. The revoking of the Water-license by Cuomo and helped by riverkeepers (JKF jr.) cause the closure. It has provided clean energy for decades.
Educate yourself in science and what the practises are regarding spend nuclear fuel.
"we found out afterwards how wrong we were, that we also see the necessity of nuclear"
Cheap is having no energy. But there is no economy* in a nation without a complete set of energy sources in all it's physical forms. How do you operate and what choices of products and services do want to provide After all these question you can only say if the price is right or high, never cheap
Cost is associated with experience, each next build is easier and more scheduled and so better financed, the examples Russia, s-korea and Chinese builders.
That comment is ignorance. Nuclear is a sustainable energy source and it provides. The challenges for clean energy (including electricity) are gigantic.
Andrew Cuomoβs successful quest to shut down the Indian Point nuclear plant spiked electricity costs and dirtied the energy grid of the city heβs now running to lead.
Whatever emotion you want to read into is on you, I gave you non. Well here is where you should start www.posiva.fi/en/index/fin... And if you need to expand Www.whatisnuclear.com
Sky above. Wheat below. Freedom within. πΊπ¦ On Flag Day, we honor our blue and yellow with action: a 10-day fundraiser for FPVs. Each drone gives defenders the eyes and precision to save lives and keep our flag flying. π Until Aug 30. Every dollar counts π www.paypal.com/donate?campa...
There are 2 sustainable sources that aren't held back and need investment, Nuclear and geothermal.
Nuclear energy isn't fossil. Ps: Does Canada have district heating?
Oldy but goldy #nuclear #energy
No must do all sustainable sources, we are only just starting.
Ps: I'm talking global, because national is almost irrelevant.
Sustainable energy! And it won't go there in a passive fashion. We have only done the easiest options. And most of that is only in the smaller electrical sector.
So you dismiss all the work and results we see from what Finland has shown with there finished repository. And you misunderstand the science or are being misinformed.. Probably not counting reprocessing operations and what isotopes are non-soluble. Ask a scientist working on this.
I meant the industries, not energy providers.
We can, and it's not millennia but centuries. I'm more concerned about heavy metal like cadmium or pfas, that stay with us forever.
No, there is no small in energy or electricity. Almost all energy is still fossil.
It's rediculous they even shut down some reactors, it's time for new reactors.
Negativity, halts progress. Let's do nothing.
Yet, that is 40 years ago. Germany has a problem with disinformation. And the gas/coal lobby was strong.
no it's not a spendfuel storage. And Germany was misinformed and suffered for it. And ofcourse the nice natural gas buy in from that democratic country called Russia helped us all. It also did line the pockets of the german politics, like premier SchrΓΆder of the SPD, that where so anti-nuclear.
They weren't used for spend nuclear fuel. And the anti-nuclear activist are blocking any storage for what is already there, so maybe get the real facts.
Stop repeating these illagical, nontechnical points. There just just anti-nuclear points, not enviromental points.
And building more gasplants now.
So you first kill off the domestic build of nuclear and then the existing nuclear builds. That makes no sense. And Germany is even building Gas plants. π€
Nor is the energy cheap in Germany. How would that be if they kept that 20+ GW of nuclear electrcity.
So you first kill off the domestic build of nuclear and then the existing nuclear builds. That makes no sense. And Germany is even building Gas plants. π€
Nuclear isn't fossil. And Germany doesn't have low electrcity prices, this is why many companies already scaled down and several left.
Taiwan has a referendum now on switching the nuclear power plants back on. Madi Hilly has a message for those who vote π
AI, meh, Yet: Not using nuclear is also very dumb and in Taiwan's case a strategic blunder to not expand it. They have a lot of industry and are under pressure from China. Importing coal and gas is also a line that can be blocked.
Not using nuclear is also very dumb and in Taiwan's case a strategic blunder to not expand it. They have a lot of industry and are under pressure from China. Importing coal and gas is also a line that can be blocked.
π€£
Also spain has a lot less in %
Good, california needs more.
If it at all is. Being irradiated doesn't mean other items become radioactive, it can with certain types of radiation and very high intensity. I understand the preventive caution from the fda. I don't understand they only detected the container afterwards, not while it went trough ship ofloading
No there not, only cesium was detected on the shipping container itself. The most important part is missing, what is the metric detected. The container came from Indonesia? Ps: everything emmits radiation.
Finally the sensible steps to keep all nuclear plants in operational condition. Maybe Belgium won't need to build all those gasplants.
Nuclear free, is soulles attitude.
A first PPA by a utility for power from a Gen IV nuclear plant was announced today. @kairospower.bsky.social will sell power to TVA for use by Google. The Hermes 2 project will change to a single reactor and increase to 50 MWe, operational in 2030. kairospower.com/external_upd...
Nuclear In My Backyard!
South Korea's nuclear power output surges as coal use plunges reut.rs/3HDukiM
Holding up clean energy twice.
yes