He means people being mean to him personally.
He/They/Any. Queer as fuck. Transphobes vocally and always unwelcome. Communist ideas Baking bread (and other stuff)
165 followers 139 following 2,093 posts
view profile on Bluesky
He means people being mean to him personally.
The Dem Party introduced paying people $8000 to cringepost
You're welcome. You can always come to me if you find yourself in need of affirmations that you're not a sad, desperate, and lonely person; one who is lashing out at any available target that might distract you from your own failed ambitions and self-loathing.
You're right, of course. This is absolutely the most valuable use of your limited time on this earth. You're addressing the most pressing issue of our time, and many, many, many people are being helped through your efforts. There's no better way to increase people's quality of life.
Great, bring up those poll numbers up to everyone you meet. It's extremely normal to care this much about the topic. No one is inching away from you trying to escape the conversation. They just are too intimidated by your raw intellect to tell you how much they want to be your friend.
Ok bud. Enjoy everyone agreeing with you. Sounds great.
Ok, great, I'm sure you're living happily in your best life, obsessed with policing other people's bodies and medical decisions that affect you not at all, except for the degenerative brain condition you've given yourself from too much time on the computer.
Sure, then you should have no problem doing exactly what I advise. Trust me, no one will think you are a complete freak with a diseased brain. That absolutely will not happen. Go for it.
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that you should be extremely vocal about your beliefs in public. Be sure to tell everyone you meet. They absolutely will not think you're a deranged freak. You will not alienate your friends and family. They will think you are an extremely intelligent and canny person.
She was on record as lying about pushing for a ceasefire, saying there would be no change in US policy towards Israel, promising that more weapons would be delivered to kill children with, and vetoing every two-state resolution at the UN. It's baffling the lies you think you can tell.
We already knew you don't care about Gazans that died under American bombs delivered by Biden. This is not surprising information.
You are a cultist baby. Cry longer and louder, please. I encourage you to indulge your most deranged instincts, so that people will take you seriously. Be sure to shout and stamp your feet to show that you're a very serious person.
If you can make up things about the present as well, that's even better. You can just live in your own little reality and never have to encounter a single fact. Bon voyage!
It must be so nice to go through life knowing nothing about history or ethics. Just a perfectly smooth brain devoid of any troublesome dips or ridges. Nothing to slow down your mouth at all.
Nazis murdered trans people and destroyed centers researching sex and gender, just FYI. No one is proposing anything like that, I'm just telling you you're a stupid fucking moron. I fail to see how that's Nazism, considering the Nazis did a lot of other, arguably much more harmful things.
Like I give a shit if appeasers of fascists and genocidal freaks like me. Christ, I'd need a lobotomy before I start seeking friends or advice in those corners. You and your moron cabal is not "everyone" despite how much you desperately want to pretend otherwise.
Don't worry, I still won't listen to you either.
Sarah McBride is a stupid fucking moron who I will not be listening to on any topic.
"Can't you guys tell you're doing politics wrong? You should listen to me: someone who absolutely despises you, and will fight against you every step of the way. That's how you'll accomplish your goals!"
Tone policing oppressed groups is apparently the only way to fight fascism.
Ah yes, the purity knife of "don't directly and materially support the genocide of an entire people". That impossible hurdle that no one could ever clear. What a fantastical, outlandish, and niche political demand. Clearly she chose the most popular and politically successful option instead.
Sending arms to a country that is using them to conduct a genocidal program is full throated support of genocide. It's about the most direct form of support you could possibly give. It is literally, direct and material support. Being a fucking liar also makes it difficult to align with you.
I love it when my transphobic governor who hates the poor and homeless grifts losers into paying for Alibaba garbage, while pretending to fight fascism. It really boosts my morale and makes me feel warm and fuzzy knowing that idiots are filling the coffers of political consultants.
This is also an intentional, direct lie that can be easily disproven. Biden bypassed Congress to deliver more than 20 billion dollars of weapons to Israel during a genocidal campaign. I can pull examples of dozens of Dems supporting Israel's slaughter. You are a deceitful, bad faith interlocutor.
He has literally advocated denying the ability for legal adults to transition until age 25, taking away rights that have existed since Reagan. Fuck your own face, you Republican piece of shit, you've never been an ally of anyone in your life.
I hope that no one you love ever has to go through the issues you so blindly ignore, or has to deal with life saving medical care being denied to them by your archons, but if they do: I hope you grow a brain, a dick, and a heart, and deal with them with compassion.
Gavin Newsom has. You're a disingenuous liar. Fuck your rationalizations you call rationality.
What's the proper language to use when policy decisions targeting minorities will, in fact, kill people? Are you actually just telling people to stop talking and stop caring?
I'm not arguing, I'm just calling you an inflated dummy who somehow has the temerity to look down on people from your low, low heights.
I'm not the arrogant baby who said no one knows a single fact about the most well known revolution in European history. Sorry to rain on your pseud parade.
Oh yeah, that obscure historical event that no one knows about: the French revolution. Fucking lol.
But besides being an illiterate idiot and bigot, you're just drunk, and won't even remember anything anyone is telling you, so there's truly no harm in being mean to you.
Being a bigot is different than being trans. No one is a bigot by nature. It's a choice you make.
No one is required to include every dipshit, racist, bigot, asshole, or illiterate in their conversations. If being inclusive means you should tolerate anything, then you shouldn't have any problems with mean people.
Holy fuck, how did you manage to get on the Internet without being able to read?
And what's even dumber is that you know you are, but pretending you're not. Probably you are scrambling right now to find some dogshit evidence for the stuff you already believed, reasoning in reverse, like any bigot caught out.
Where's your evidence that being trans while competing in sports gives you an advantage? You don't have it because there is no such evidence, you're literally just drawing on bigotry to make that conclusion.
No, it's fascism, but unfortunately you're very stupid.
Also the right flank is a reliable voting block because their politicians cater to them! You'd have to be blind to not see the rightward shift in the Republican party in response to their bases' demands! So are you blind, stupid, right-wing, or all three?
LGBT voters voted 86% for Kamala, despite her openly saying that she would enforce anti LGBT laws. And this is the thanks we get, being told to fall in line even better. Why don't you address your admonitions to white men you freak?
Because you want people in power who will hurt me and the people I love. Asking for people who don't want to hurt me and my interests is not asking for perfection, it's basic politics.
How do you hold onto an ideological flank while constantly telling them to go fuck themselves? Republicans hold onto their ideological flank by appealing to them and giving them what they want. Explain why this is impossible for Dems to do.
So why did you lose the last election appealing to moderates?
Why isn't Gavin Newsom or any other Dem responsible for using language that will draw people into their coalition?
If you don't think that denying people medical care that they are by all rights entitled to is harmful and will result in deaths, the burden of proof is on you.
Try telling women that they have to hold their nose and vote for anti abortion candidates, and see how many votes you garner.
Gavin Newsom wants to deny life-saving medical treatment to adults up to age 25. It's not hyperbolic in the least. But if you truly think so, let's try taking away your medical care for a couple decades and see if you still feel that way.
Also why are moderates reliable when appealing to them hasn't worked, at all?
Why haven't centrists figured out that a platform that includes killing members of the left voting coalition isn't attractive to leftists?
Right, so you don't care what a politician's beliefs are, just that they have a D next to their name on the ballot line. Enjoy your next election loss, since you refuse to listen to voters.
Ok, so you don't give a shit about his position on trans people, and how he wants to deny life saving medical care to them. What if I asked you to unite behind a candidate who hates you, and wants you and your family to die? Would you be comfortable supporting that person?
Not by voting for people who want to kill members of your supposed coalition. Maybe you could ask candidates to not behave with contempt and hostility towards members of that coalition so that they'll vote, instead of asking voters to completely disregard their own interests.
What's the general acceptable age limit for people to get life-saving medication in your view? Do you have a limit for people who aren't trans, or is this only a question trans people are expected to entertain?
You are a racist freak.
Like we understand your position: The things that politicians do to to undermine LGBT advocacy aren't a deal breaker for you. They're just part of the cost of doing politics in your worldview, but you can't even stoop to imagine a different perspective. What a piss poor psych you must be.
You're not reading any of mine, so why should anyone do you the courtesy you refuse to offer. There's zero acknowledgement of the legitimacy of anyone else's point of view, so why do you seem to think you're being so magnanimous when really you're just telling people to shut the fuck up?
Ok, but why are Nazis like Charlie Kirk included in that compromise process, and trans people are not? Is 'not platforming open fascists who want to do harm to your prospective voters' an unthinkable magic feat? Because it seems like it could be done purely by omission.
But you won't engage with people about the harms that 'less than perfect' candidates do.
Why is it the case that people should disregard the harms done to the groups you mention by 'less than perfect candidates?' Requiring people to never talk about their distaste for politicians that actively harm them also does not seem to expand the coalition. It in fact seems to directly shrink it.
"Hanging out with Nazis and agreeing with their Nazi beliefs is actually strong leadership. You can trust me because I definitely didn't lose the last election to Nazis.". Eat shit and hair.
If you say anything negative ever about the president of the United States, you love and support Trump. You are not allowed to criticize dear leader. We should all be writing fawning think pieces about how Biden makes 10 hole-in-ones every round of golf like it's North Korea.
You are not a serious person.
Damn, you couldn't pay me to admit to being this ignorant in public.
No, because socialists meaningfully oppose fascists like him instead of just pretending to. They love Dems who just flap their hands and pretend to be powerless.
The purpose of a system is what it does. They're not in the dark, they just don't want the same things as their constituents. They highly prefer a system that centralizes power in the hands of the wealthy to any form of economic democratization, no matter how benign.
The problem with leaning into her authenticity is that she's an authentically slimy CIA creep.
Imagine they had united behind Bernie, who had the much, much, much larger movement. Which they did, except for Warrenite dead-enders, because it was more important to them to see Biden win.
Btw, working people can tell when you're lying to them with impunity, believing no one will call you out. We can smell your contempt for us and our intelligence.
Its crazy that you can't help yourself lying about this. Half the sick days that the unions were lobbying for is not "the deal they actually wanted". And "the least odorous piece of dog shit in the past 50 years" is not the accolade you think it is.
Right, the guy who told train workers that they don't deserve sick time and made it illegal for them to strike is a "huge union guy". I'm sure the people who have to come to work sick because of his tireless advocacy really appreciate him using his power to crush organized labor. Fucking liars....
Don't forget the use of the crying laughing emoji to show that you're not mad, and are, in fact, laughing.
Well fair. I'll just say that everyone who has ever attempted to criticize Dems in office or out has been told 'now's not the time, there's an election coming up/just happened/could happen soon' that has been used to shut down dissent. Which is why the right time is always Now.
Seething rage
So when Biden was in office: what were your thoughts on the people attempting to hold him to account?
If you're wearing an IDF shirt in the midst of a genocide being perpetuated by the IDF, you're choosing to represent the actions of the government. You don't get to wear a Nazi armband and claim to be just a regular German, and that the actions of the country's leadership has nothing to do with you
The Dems are telling on themselves when they say they want a Rogan because what Rogan does is fool uneducated and low info voters into thinking republicans care about them, but Dems trying to trick their base is why they lose. What dems want is a golden goose that makes promises the Dems won't keep.
Right, but the issue is you're just lying.
Is inviting Charlie Kirk and other Republican fascists on your podcast to talk about how much you agree with them actually standing up to Trump? Or is it ceding rhetorical ground to people who want me and my loved ones dead? Because it seems an awful lot more like the latter
So, a lot of big talk and zero physical actions or policy changes in material reality. You could show us something like that
If by "standing up to Trump" you mean rolling over and showing his belly like a sick dog, then sure, I agree. Some people like that in their politicians I guess.
If voters like you are alienated by the position that trans people exist and deserve to live in peace, then you might as well just vote for Trump and get it over with. Your home is in the Republican party where biological essentialism and the politics of punishment are de jure.
What happened 2: Or how learned to stop worrying and love the bomb.
Probably not, since landlords are pretty much the only people cops care about protecting. Also the category of employment would be "rent-seeking middleman", otherwise known as "economic parasite".
What a low bar for a human being to clear.
Oh shoot, you found my moral and intellectual superior? Where are they? I'd love to chat and pick their brain.
If you are pushing transphobic candidates 3 years before the election, you can shove your opinion way up inside yourself.
Why are you so intolerant of this one opinion people have? Shouldn't you be able handle this disagreement without writing them off?
You are lying to yourself to preserve your self-image.
Your "strong views" based on anecdotes can't survive even the most basic scrutiny.
Genocide denial is a sickness that needs to be eradicated. People will remember the things that were said and done during this time, and the monsters who enabled these crimes. I hope that you have made your peace with that.
Also note that 'other minorities' in the above includes Palestinians. See point #1 re: the results of the 2024 election.
Tell Newsom and other Dem presidental hopefuls to fuck off if they even consider throwing trans people or other minorities under the bus to further their ambitions because: 1. It will not work. They will generate such antipathy that they will lose 2. More importantly: It's monsterous to do so.
Maybe because you're busy forgiving someone for attacking trans people when it is in no way, shape, or form within your remit to do so. If someone wanted to be an ally to trans people, they might consider asking them about the political figures who they support.
Gavin Newsom is rolling over and showing his belly like a sick dog on the issues of Trans healthcare and homelessness. if this is what you think fighting looks like, it's no wonder you only know how to lose.
So you only want to defeat Trump with strategies that are suited to decades long past. Best of luck with that. Hope you figure out your universal time machine to make it 1992 again. Many will say that's impossible, but I believe in you
Right. Genocide isn't worth getting angry over, but paint getting on a political campaign office is. It's time to center the feelings of western liberals. The most important and persecuted people of all.
"I'm a moron who remains anti-good-things. Given the choice between good things and absolute dogshit, I think me and my dogshit-loving friends will keep eating dogshit".
Shit the fuck up dumbass. Funding for the iron dome is getting everyone who isn't Israeli killed, while Israel kills innocent people by the hundreds of thousands with impunity. But that would require you thinking of Arabs as people, so I'm not holding my breath, you racist POS.
If I have to shit on every other Democrat, every time they do something shitty, before I ever get to criticize electeds that I hope would actually represent me in Congress for their dogshit votes, I will simply never be represented ever. Which is no doubt what you want. So fuck off.
Why even bother having socialist electeds in the first place if you can never hold them to any kind of standard? So you can feel better about someone using a label that means nothing? I don't get it!