The most high profile Democrats in the country are Schumer and Jeffries. What are they using their bully pulpits for? Jeffries has been tougher on Zohran Mamdani than on Trump or Mike Johnson.
The most high profile Democrats in the country are Schumer and Jeffries. What are they using their bully pulpits for? Jeffries has been tougher on Zohran Mamdani than on Trump or Mike Johnson.
no, he frigging hasn't. I don't love him giving Cuomo's bullshit validation but he certainly isn't harder on Mamdani than he's been on the Republicans, let's not do this.
Jeffries has suggested Mamdani is anti-Semitic. Has he suggested Mike Johnson is a fascist?
he's certainly pushed back a lot harder against the actual shit Johnson and Trump are *doing* to fuck us all over. Haven't seen where Jeffries suggested Mamdani is antisemitic; I *did* see him prop up Cuomo's bullshit projection about the rent.
Well, rent control has been tried in many communities and cities and has HIGHLY variable results. Cuomo may have a point or two,(I don't know what got said), but it's not as if it's a new idea. Longtime Dem policy w highly variable outcomes. Voters rejected it in CA last year.
Ok first of all Cuomo deliberately was conflating rent *control* with rent *stabilization* and we most definitely have it here, I'd be priced out myself if we didn't. Mamdani lives in a rent stabilized apartment, like most of New York. Cuomo says he's too rich to live there.
have stabilization, that is. Cuomo also is pushing what landlords want, to get rid of rent stabilization, but he's trying to make like his own multimillionaire ass is righteously offended by someone earning like 150K living in a $2300 Queens one bedroom.
It was *blatant* horse shit. Just incredibly clumsy and disingenuous, not least because he also conflated that apartment with "low income housing" that a homeless (single? idr) mother would otherwise have. Jeffries lives in NY; he knows better than that.
If he isn't anti-Semitic why would the Jewish community be concerned about him like Jeffries suggests? thehill.com/homenews/cam...
yeh ok the don't-scare-the-horses shit is gross. Look. I think Mamdani's the bee's knees. I think the "denounce the intifada" Islamophobia is horseshit. And, I think there's bad blood over Mamdani not endorsing Harris.
I wish *everyone* would fucking drop it on Mamdani's position on national/international level politics at this point. I wish Jeffries would get over it, yep. And I wish people generally on here could be a bit less bitches eating crackers over Schumer, Jeffries, and "The Dems" generally.
I have a lot of...feelings...re people who abstained myself, tbh. I think Mamdani's talented and an overall good for the party and the country that I don't feel like relitigating, personally. I understand to some degree folks who do, that said. And again, no, *how* Jeffries is doing it isn't ok.
Mamdani voted for Harris. He just didn't go out of his way to campaign for her. This went unnoticed because he was an unknown state legislator in a city Harris easily adult won. It's been brought up after the fact to justify Schumer, Jeffries, Hochul, Gillibrand not supporting him.
You know, I'm gonna have to do my own proverbial research at this point because I keep getting conflicted reports about to what degree and whether he did or didn't and like I said: I personally am not that fussed, *with him.* Gillibrand can eat my entire ass.
Schumer's pissed me off for a number of reasons, not least for basically supporting universities censoring pro Palestinian protesters. That said--ugh, there's a lot here.
Schumer and Jeffries are the highest ranking Democrats in the country. That's why the focus is on them. They have the biggest bully pulpits. Look at what Newsom and Pritzker are doing. Why aren't Schumer and Jeffries doing it?
See, he espouses policies that are fine - they are DEM policies all of them. Free transit? Boston. Even fucking BUFFALO. Rent control? Everywhere. But he WILLFULLY led the "leave it blank" movement that meant fascism was NOT A DEAL BREAKER for him. Oh? How then do we TRUST him?
So. My understanding is that leave it blank was for the primaries. Uncommitted, I didn't love, but effectively they endorsed her in all but name by the end. Rightly or wrongly I've been cutting a bit more slack for Muslims and/or people with regional ties. As for trust...
I'm aware I'm simultaneously arguing right this moment for people who can't trust Jeffries and can't trust Mamdani and like. idk. Coalition is a thing. So is timing. So is context. I also think Brad Lander is the bee's knees, a mensch; rightly or wrongly his endorsement kind of sealed my deal.
HIM I like! The fact HE likes Mamdani is one reason I'm open to Mamdani. All easy to say - I live 3000 miles away so, like, who cares what I think? Jeffries shares my revulsion at the way Mamdani did not fight fascism and in fact enhanced it. That said, I would be pissed if Jeffries endorsed Cuomo.
Yeah it does piss me off that people keep saying Jeffries DID endorse Cuomo. I don't see that. I see him being pissy and Not Helping, mainly. I also think people are being entirely too bitches eating crackers over Jeffries, Schumer, and the Dems as a party and a lot of people are being played.
It spilled over into the general. Millions who did not vote cited that as a reason. I sure saw NO 'tactical endorsement' from ANY of them. Not one. And here we are - no fight for Palestinians at ALL. So how is this not a DSA "kill liberalism so we can take over" ploy?
I had a big fight with a very good friend over this too, p.s. She's sincerely and deeply passionate about Palestine. It hasn't abated. I also think, and she's probably not the only one, she's kind of made it her entire personality because of yep some discord sowing & displaced personal shit.
Those who fought for Palestine BEFORE all this still are passionate and filled with grief. But one suspects given the abrupt end of demonstrations that it either wasn't genuine and a way to kill liberalism or it's cowardly and fears Trump. I feel for her and Palestinians. REAL genocide now.
Like I'm saying to the other person I'm talking to from the other end right now, I...have a lot of feelings here, lol. I generally lean toward your POV more than not, I think; DSA is a mixed bag but I ragequit when the Chicago branch announced they were gonna try to sink the DNC, for a start.
That said, other person says Mamdani DID vote for her in the end, and since I keep hearing a lot of conflicting messages on to what degree he did or didn't endorse I'm gonna have to do my own proverbial research. I'm: pragmatic. Which is my and I suspect your main beef with the DSA/abstainers.
I was with them in the 70s as DSoc. That was their goal from the start. It's the old Thalmass view: burn it down, we, DSA, will fix it. Yeah - 85,000 members, ZERO accomplishments anywhere, and yet THEY will 'save us'. 🤦♀️
Yep but it's weird people complain about uncommitted. They were protesting within the Democratic Party. And that was against Biden, not Harris. The voters are blamed for Biden and then Harris ignoring them. Israel's war has 8% support among Democrats. Democrats chose Netanyahu, paid the price.
Jeffries isn't the Pope of Jews. In fact, he's Baptist.
I mean yeah overall it's been Christians who've been going balls out for the old line Dem position on Israel, circumstances be damned, mostly on account of there's a lot more of them.
And despite his ties to the liberationist Black church, he gets trashed for BEING a Baptist. Nobody's happy w what they do not understand.
Yep. That's something I've been hesitating to say but: yep. Contest. Schumer is a Jewish Boomer and yeah so is Sanders but Sanders is in frigging Vermont. Jeffries is Black, and a lot of people have been giving him shit for things they don't understand--"God's on His Throne" is *not* "be passive"
"context" not contest
and yeah by and large it's a lot of white people who don't even go to this shul who've been going OFF about "Zionism" and it makes me *really* itchy. There's a continuum, let's say. But also on here especially, you never know who's real and who's just stirring shit up.
When he speaks "God is on His Throne" it's a signal to remember that people will be strong enough for the fight. White people have to know the history to understand the message. Black Church isn't your passive white oppressive experience. Mmm. NOT at all!
yeah, I flashed to the Staple Singers doing "Wade in the Water." I think a lot of people just heard the abusive right wing church they grew up in. I get it, but. If you want to be in coalition. History. It's a thing.
I'm so happy to see this discussion. It's become a strange world, indeed, when I am the one defending religion and going to church. Yet I do it a lot. Partly because I admire Black churches and the central role they've had for generations of people living with some hideous truths.
I do policy education and grassroots mobilization for a VERY liberal faith organization. Four denominations are historic Black Churches. Lived and worked in Black communities and learned a lot about their brilliant self-direction, but the Churches added layers to that!
I keep urging lefties to watch Prof. Gates' "The Black Church" 2-part special on PBS. It's transformative. The Black Church was and is a liberation base. Only place Black people could learn to READ during slavery. It's not a passive, wimpy place. Oh, some, mostly POWERFUL! Led EVERY social movement.
btw, and maybe it's just proof of he's *really* good at code-switching, but I saw a short speech by Mamdani in front of an AME congregation in NY and I was pretty blown away. Cited Scripture, succinct but on point.
We'll see.