I didnt say I had anything against him. I correctly said he went to a protest to LARP with his shitty gun. He had NO business being there and if it were my son, Id disown him. But, he didnt technically break any laws. Hes still a dipshit kid who had no reason to be there with a gun.
Says who, you? 🤣😂 Despite YOUR ignorance, Kyle had every right to be there, armed, just like everyone else. Once YOU accept that reality is the moment YOU become less ignorant.
If you think an 18 yr old, who didnt live in the city, should be carrying an assault rifle on dangerous streets, I dont know what to tell you. He wasnt helping anyone. If he werent there, those people wouldnt have died. I have a right to burn the flag in the road, but its probably a bad idea.
I blocked that meathead a long time ago.
You don’t know that those people would not have died. Nobody does. Is Joseph Rosenbaum still present in this alternate timeline? Given his hostile and violent conduct toward others, it is equally likely that he would have been shot dead by police or any of the other armed individuals. 🤷🏻♂️
I know Kyle wouldnt have killed him. He has no business there.
But you don’t actually know that they would not have died, and that was your point, I believe. His business there was to protect property. That is what many people who descended on Kenosha, also openly armed, took it upon themselves to do. That was their business. 🤷🏻♂️
That's a weak argument for an unprovoked attack, victim blamer.
Kyle wasn't in possession of an assault rifle. You're just victim blaming. Why are you relieving Rosenbaum of any & all culpability? When Rosenbaum attacked Kyle, he was running to extinguish a car fire. How are you justifying the unprovoked attack on Kyle by Rosenbaum?
Sorry, he was 17. Kyle Rittenhouse was in possession of a Smith & Wesson M&P 15, an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle, on the night of the Kenosha shootings. He was 17 years old at the time. Do you live under a rock?
BTW. You never answered my questions. Why? 🤔
The semantics of whether its semi-auto is irrelevant. With a hairpin trigger there are people that can fire just as fast as some full auto weapons. If that dipshit wasnt there with a gun, would Rosenbaum have attacked him? Im guessing no. Thats why he has no culpability.
If that woman didn't wear a short dress......
You were wrong about the assault rifle reference. Also, that's a page from victim blaming 101. Kyle had just as much right to be there as Rosenbaum. However, Kyle wasn't reckless & looking for trouble. That would be Rosenbaum. Chances are, he would've attacked someone else.
Terrible analogy. Child walking down the street trying to be cool with a "long barreled" gun. Basically all that was missing was a sign asking to have his ass kicked. Would you want your child doing this?
Nobody knew his age. In the context of where he was, against a backdrop of scores of people openly armed with rifles and other firearms, he wasn’t particularly conspicuous. Nobody appeared to be alarmed or gave him a second look in the videos where he is seen walking along Sheridan Road with Balch.
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed. Additionally, there's no scenario where being armed forfeits your right to self defense.
I didnt know kids could open carry. This coming from the party that thinks kids seeing gay people makes them gay. But you are totally fine with kids going to riots with guns. Make it make sense.
I'm aware. 😂 And? Per WI state law, Kyle was carrying a long-barreled rifle legally in an open carry state. An assault rifle is capable of selective fire. Kyle's wasn't. You said it yourself. Semi-auto.