No i didnt. It is no different than an AR except by semantics. I own more guns thab you, I promise. A hair pin trigger and practice can make mode irrelevant. What makes you think i didnt know his connection to Kenosha? Because I dog walked you into saying something incorrect?
Who advised you that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with a firearm? It certainly wasn't from watching the trial. That media lie was addressed during the opening statements by ADA Binger & the origin was proven during the course of the trial.
When did i speak on this?
Ah, I see the confusion. I didnt realize I said that. Yes he crossed state lines. Yes, he had a gun. Yes he lied about that in court and said it was at a friends house. (Black maybe?)..I believe the "proof" that it was in Kenosha was the receipts to buy it. I dont trust his word. Sorry
It was at Black’s address because it was Black’s gun. There was no evidence that Rittenhouse ever owned it, nor any that he had ever taken it to Illinois or possessed it there. There was no evidence that he had even seen or handled it after the weekend that it was purchased in May until August 25th.
Sure thing bud.
You are free to believe what you like. All I am saying is that there was no evidence. That is just a fact.
There was evidence, just none youd accept. Ill agree he got away with it. But hes EXTREMELY lucky to be alive.
And, with respect, if there is evidence, then why not present it? It is a really old debating deflection tactic when people make a claim of evidence, but decline to present it with the caveat of "You would only dismiss my evidence". How do you know if I haven't seen what you propose?
Because its anecdotal and Im not evsn sure. I accept it. I just dont care.
There was no evidence that Rittenhouse had ever owned the rifle or had ever kept it. Black testified that he bought the rifle in his name on May 1st and that it was kept at his address in Kenosha. He still owned that gun when it was destroyed in 2022, and had to sign off on its destruction.
All the evidence of the shootings was exculpatory. There was nothing to suggest that he acted unlawfully. There was nothing in the videos or witness testimony that hurt his case for self-defense under WI s.939.48. Why do you think critics ignore this and focus on "He never should have been there" ?
Because he never should have been there. You know this. I know this. If that were yoyr lid, would you say you did a good job parenting?? Would you advise your child to go to a riot with weapon of war?
You're not accepting evidence. -You discounted Officer Moretti's testimony. -Inserted your own statistic. "99.9% of the people weren't armed." -You insist that Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm. Despite evidence to the contrary. You lack integrity.
Cool story bro
You're free to prove otherwise. Oddly, you're making claims that the prosecution didn't even make. 🤔
Why are you making claims that the prosecution didn't even make? That's odd. Perhaps you can explain this.
Funny he didn't respond to this. I wonder if he thinks the Lake County prosecutor or DA Binger was lying about the gun always being in WI. I wonder if he realizes they would have interviewed many people, like Black's stepfather who kept it in his gun safe.
Dogwalked? You claimed that Kenosha wasn't Kyle's community despite proof that it was. He had a secondary residence there with his dad. He worked there (RecPlex). Had extended family & friends who lived there. The rifle was semi-auto. Not an assault rifle like you claimed.
Yes im going armed to my secondary and tertiary communities next week due to the increased crime in DC(actually decreased 40%). Worked there, had friends there, give me a break. If you are going to a riot carrying a gun, you better be prepared to lay your life down.
False Equivalence.
