I never said he wasnt legally in the right on this point. Quit making assumptions. Yes, the guy threw a paper bag at him. Yes he ran at him and threatened him. Maybe he would have died by another minor carrying a rifle designed to kill humans. Still immoral. Learn to fight before carrying.
Rosenbaum wasn't a particularly big guy, but he had done ten years in prison. His prison record showed that he had assaulted people whilst incarcerated. He was violent, belligerent and suicidal, with apparently little to lose. And you are upset because a minor that he attacked wouldn't fight him?
gun...guess what? He wouldnt need to fear. Rosenbaum didnt attack all those other folks carrying assault weapons. I wonder why? Almost like Rittenhouse goaded him?
I'll tell you why, because those other folks weren't alone. Even ex-marine Jason Lackowski, who thought of Rosenbaum as a babbling idiot, had to concede on the witness stand that had he found himself in Rittenhouse's position, things might have been different.
"Almost like Rittenhouse goaded him" There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your theory. You're ignoring the violent threats (2x) made by Rosenbaum that same night.
Yes. I am. Dads raise pussies these days. Instead of showing them the ropes and how to defend themselves, they are lazy and give them guns. If Rittenhouse got his ass beat, hed have learned a lesson here. Instead, he felt he needed to kill the guy in fear hed take his gun. If he didnt have a
Until the law dictates that carrying a gun is unlawful, then being in possession of one and being in fear that a violent lunatic (who has threatened to kill you already) is going to take it from you is not that unreasonable. Nobody is obliged to take a beating, as this idiot also tried to assert.
I disagree. Well have to agree to disagree. Its a provocative action and will get you shot where Im from. You can point to laws all day long, but open carry around here and the law isnt going to save you. Thats just life.
It wasn't exactly a normal day out.
Your personal beliefs on open carry are in direct conflict with the current open carry laws in WI. The laws don't care about your feelings.
Agreed. The National guard in LA, the EO revoking birthright citizenship, trumps conviction of rape(as said by the judge), trump falsifying documents, his illegal tariffs....those laws dont care about your feelings either. It is what it is.
Lol. You've been trying to bait me into a political discussion for days now. Not interested. Why would I be? You're not even accepting the facts regarding Rittenhouse.
No, you wont be goaded because youd be cooked. In all of the things ive mentioned, i have a stronger case than Rittenhouse. I have the constitution
You've already shown your lack of integrity with Rittenhouse & your refusal to accept facts. Under those conditions, I have no reason to enter into a second debate with you.
What Constitution? He's obviously not in the USA; in no State of the Union will open carry 'get you shot'. It may cause the police to confront you and require compliance but it's not a shoot-on-sight 'provocation'.
Uh huh. Keep telling yourself that.
It's never immoral to defend yourself against unprovoked attacks. Never.
They werent unprovoked. Thats what you dont get. Him carrying the gun was a provocation. What happened to men? Everyone is such a pusse they have to carry guns around. If they were illegal here, this shit wouldnt happen.
Open carrying a rifle in an open carry state is hardly proof of provocation. In fact, Kyle wasn't guilty of disorderly conduct for doing so.
Its a provocation to many people regardless of law. Do there here or close by in Memphis, the law wont save you buddy. Im just trying to express the reality of the issue.
Then I suggest those people stay away from open carry states. Your personal beliefs conflict with the open carry laws in WI.