back to the core issue - do you think it matters whether or not the president obeys the law?

Absolutely. Like enforcing our border which Biden didn’t do despite his lawful requirement to do so. Or the fact he ALSO had top secret documents at his home but got a free pass. Or that his son was a walking legal nightmare and daddy had to pardon him. On and on. Yes, laws matter.

again, proving my point that you only care about dems. the issue at hand is Trump possibly not following the law and Cook making use of lawful efforts to redress her grievances - to that you respond by asserting that her valid use of the legal system shows Dems don't care about crime

That’s not at all what I said. I literally said if there are red states or others making it even more lax, that’s wrong. That includes conservatives, GOP, whatever.

Literacy isn’t your strong point

Two Masters degrees, I’m retired in my mid 50’s, two homes…somehow I managed. 😂😂😂

yet somehow you think "the law matters" means "the law doesn't matter" did you just do a shitload of drugs that led to substantial brain damage?

also fun to scroll down your timeline and see that you are a big defender of the crimes that Trump commits. Massive projection issue on your part

Which crimes are those, Corey?

the fraud he committed you also don't care that he is taking illegal actions as president. even here, you are saying that asking the president to obey the law is disdain for the law. you don't think law applies to republicans, like trump you view it as a tool to punish those you dislike

The fraud he committed…you mean the first time EVER that NYC prosecuted that because of an insane AG who didn’t want justice, just a scalp. The NY appeals court overturned the penalty last week AND allowed for appeal on the conviction itself. When that happens, what do you have?

appeal of a conviction is a right, allowing it is literally required by law

And when it is overturned, I bet bottom dollar you will still run around and say it was unjust overturn and he still committed fraud…the hypocrisy from the left in these matters is off the charts.

if it isn't overturned you're still going to defend him and bitch about the unjust courts if it is overturned I might address the content of the decision. And, yes, I will absolutely say that my opinion is that doing the things he did objectively satisfies the elements of the law

Illegal aliens…the left suddenly doesn’t care about the law. Mortgage fraud…the left suddenly doesn’t care about the law. Stealing $600 in California…that’s not fair to criminals so now they have to steal $900 for it to be law breaking…Portland rescinding drug laws = total shithole now. 🤦‍♀️🤔🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

mortgage fraud - the left doesn't care about the law because of allegations made without evidence where no charges have been filed CA- you are uninformed about what the law is. but changing a law necessarily shows care about the law pdx - again, you're ignorant and don't understand law

CBS has the documents of mortgage fraud…. youtu.be/ccoYfBIN7O8?...

yeah, they have the mortgage agreement. As with the allegations, there's no discussion of whether there is a rider. more importantly, though, there's no examination of the application - the document that *she* is responsible for the information on

PDX I understand so well because Portland has now finally come to grips and reversed the idiotic laws they changed. Again, got to see it up close and personal way too many times on business trips. Absolute shit hold it became. www.opb.org/article/2024...

setting aside that the failure to prove causation here(and typical dumbshit overreaction), your claim was that this showed that dems don't care about the law

Dems don’t care about law…only when it benefits them. If illegal aliens benefited the GOP, Dems would be building a wall faster than you can imagine. They used lawfare to the hilt last few years, now they are complaining when used against them. FAFO

and thank you for openly admitting that the thing you pretend to care about is simply a partisan position and not any sort of principled belief. Fantastic work

Oh it’s an absolute principled belief. Period. I mentioned California because I lived there for decades and watched it be ruined. Literally ruined. I didn’t mention blue or red states, you did. I mentioned those areas I know well like Portland, California, where I lived.

I am not uninformed about what they did in California, I had to live it…more importantly my wife had to live it for years as an employee in LA county for a large retailer. She was smack in the middle of that idiotic nonsense.

your claim that stealing something worth less than $900 wasn't illegal is blatantly false. so if you do know what happened you're an admitted liar. do you think that red states with an even higher felony cutoff also don't care about the law, or does it only count when dems do it?

In practical terms, it matters. It was misdemeanor now and the police couldn’t be bothered. So it effectively diluted the law entirely. My wife would have people come into the store, with their smart phones tabulating the amounts. Then stealing $850worth….comeback an hour later and do it again.

thanks for admitting that you lied about the issue still, you didn't answer my question about red states. which is to say you absolutely answered my question you don't care about law, you care about being a partisan hack

I moved from California to a red state, we don’t put up with any of that crap. If there are other red states with higher cutoff, I am absolutely against it. Would love to know what those red states are.

I didn’t lie, I stated the factual reality of what happened. Just as I stated the factual reality of what happened in Portland…insane laws and policies by an unhinged leftist ideology.

Without evidence? CNN, Reuters, etc have already produced the documents where she clearly stated on TWO houses she bought within 2 months of each other they were here primary residences. The evidence is there, would you like the links? And, she hasn’t denied any of it.

yes, please link to the evidence why does her not denying it matter?