Tohle je mnohem lepší vysvětlení. 🙂
Tohle je mnohem lepší vysvětlení. 🙂
Nesouhlasím s tím, že se všichni chovají stejně a jenom mají jiné týmy. V článku je vidět, že lidé se vzděláním volí populisty mnohonásobně méně. ANO volí 42% lidí bez maturity a 18% lidí s vysokou školou. U Spolu je trend opačný 10% vs 32%.Stejné trendy jsou i u ostatních velkých politických stran.
Tak s tím osobně fakt nesouhlasím. Kritické myšlení a vzdělání je důležité, jenom to není 100% spása a lék na laciné lži a populismus. Je to ale dostatečně statisticky významný faktor. Jinak ano, důležitá je kloudná diskuze a osočování je kontraproduktivní. zpravy.aktualne.cz/datavize/tur...
What is and what is not politically accepteble for russians is imho absolutely out of our reach here in EU.
Where is Russia "winning"? Slow grind at frontlines for astronomical life and material cost? Economic isolation? Economic downturn (inflation, high rates, higher taxes, sky high cost of military and security,bancrupcies, cutting demand, logistics problems) Lowering low quality of life Gas shortages
Say goodbye to fake reviews!👋 We welcome the Code of Conduct for Online Ratings and Reviews for Tourism Accommodation. Only real guests can leave reviews, ensuring clearer, fairer, and more reliable information for everyone. A win for travellers and accommodation providers ↓ europa.eu/!r8TDmp
Who says that we should let Russia win this?
Probability that EU will won war against Russia is high, but it will not be without scratch and it could endanger democracy here, also with big risk of nuclear or other conflicts around the world. Or there will be total war. These are just fantasies that do not account the real world. Its not easy!
Because everyone in Baltics has the idea of what will happen when they will not do it. That is not the case in Germany or e.g. Spain. So it is much easier for any politician there to push forvard this if there is very little opposition for that. So it is very much about democracy...
Also it doesnt mean that if Russia is slowly advancing that Rusia is winning. Those are two very different things.
EU is based on democracy and transparency. And disadvantage of democracy system is that it is slower. And slow movement is also an advantage, because drastic changes are not possible over night. EU support really got momentum this year after US turned into idiocracy. www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-a...
And EU is doing more. Price cap of 45$ will be effecive in two days.EU replaced US aid because now there is none. There are talks how to use those 200 bil. € of russian frozen assets. That is a major shift from 2022. That is 2% of whole EU GDP or 10% of russian GDP. We cant destroy us while we help.
They will never want more than Kherson, Zaporizia, Donetsk and Luhanks oblast. Just sign the "peace capitulation deal" and dismantle your army. Who cares that russian language apperantely have no word for never. It translates in their autocratic minds to later.
Well, those words were just criticism.
That is not true. But we are slow and very careful. We were caught off guard. 85% reduction in fossil fuels. Sanctions against Russia. Price cap. Frozen assets. Military aid, financial aid, humanitarian aid, inteligence aid. Building our and UKR military infrastructure. We can do more of course.
❗️The plane Ursula von der Leyen @vonderleyen.ec.europa.eu was on was forced to land in Bulgaria due to suspected Russian GPS interference -FT There are reports that the pilots even had to use paper maps due to GPS jamming as they made the emergency landing.
▪️Overall, the oil and gas sector, on which every fourth ruble in the budget and almost 20% of Russian GDP depends, lost 50.4% of its net profit. 45% of companies in the sector ended the half-year with losses totaling 749.5 billion rubles.
Not really. BYD got only 1,2% of the market. It is an impresive boost in its July sales, but still way to go to the top.
Tesla had in July 0,8% of the european auto market (4,7% of EV market). EV market in Europe rose 33% in July (+25% in 2025) Tesla is down 40% (-33% in 2025). That can be hardly sees as a "leading" car brand. It actually means that Tesla is 28th. Being a nazi, idiot and sociopath matters.
"We know that you suffer because of this shit war we orchestered. We know that you have lost three sons, but dont be afraid, be strong! Here is a little pet pet.And now fuck off I need to go to my golden mansion to have my back massaged and eat some fresh caviar delivered to my table by helicopter."
Now the only possible low where russian officials can go is 2000 words of comfort for their population.
There is like 99% probability that the Supreme court of US will find some way to discard this ruling because it is full of Trump guys. And US now is just about the loyalty not about law and order.
Thank you,finaly someone acknowledging that it could be caused by language barrier which was I trying to say. Probably not skillefuly but I am no diplomat.Now I know that there are some poeple who says they are religious atheist and they dont mean what I see in those words.Sorry about inconvinience.
It is because it has different meaning in czech language. I am an unbiliever. In czech atheist means both ateista and nevěřící. Read this in czech. cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A1... cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ateismus
I am an unbiliever. In czech atheist means both ateista and nevěřící. Than read this in czech. And than fuck off you ignorant. cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ateismus
Same goes your way...
That doesnt mean I am not curious...
Atheist by my view can mean various things. One of them is 1). Another is rejection of all kinds religions. Another is rejection of everything which is not based on evidence. I also found these definitions on Wikipedia. So I am not alone.
I am not insisting that I am right. I am just explaining my point of view. Which can be terribely wrong. I am just insisting on that I can have my own view and I do not have to change my mind just because someone tells me that. Sorry but Czechia is one of the most ateistic non religious country.
I am not religious, I do not practise or observe one. Sorry but I cant imagine that religious atheist is not contradicting statement. I am just not capable of that.
Interesting, than why I spent hours in this discusion if I am not curious?
No, you can say I am an idiot. I dont care.
No, because it was said together with for me contradicting statement of religious atheist. Which I thought nobody would ever use to describe themselfs.
But that means that everybody has to be keen to learn and explore which is sadly not the case in real world.
So dont tell me that I am refusing to learn when I spent hours disscussing this thing.
No, based on what people say to me here I am incapable of imagining religion and all its aspects because it does not make sense to me.
So now read this. cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ateismus
My failurie to understand that is because I am not religious. I am not practising or observing any religion. So I am not capable of imagining that reality. Now I know that there are some people who describes themselfs with for me contradicting statement of religious atheist.
Do you acknowledge that it can be confusing for people outside the jewish comunity?
And why is that wrong? Word can change its meaning like the world is changing. And the one with the most agreement will be used later.
I dont think so. I tried to look it up and found that people does not agree what atheist or religious exactly mean. It does not have one meaning.
I did that because I couldnt imagine that there are many people who actually describes themselfs with that for me contradicting statement. As I get it I am not the first one confused and probably not last. Lack of information does not make me antisemite. It can make me ignorant.
I did that because I reacted to contadicting statement in my view. So I couldnt imagine that there are many people who actually describes themselfs with that for me contadicting statement. As I get it I am not the first one and I will not be the last one.
I am not trying to impose my believes to anyone. I am just confused from this. I learned that people say about them that they are atheist and religious. Which doesnt make sense to me but at least now I know that some people do that.
What? So you know better than me how I view the world? Interesting.
English. It is also not defined in English. I tried to look it up and I found that poeple does have different views on what atheist and religion means.
Where I am asking for pity?
If I dont know I am saying insults... I was reacting to for me contradicting statement. So I used unpolite words to point out the contradiction because I couldnt imagine that there are many people who uses this phrase to describe themselfs. Apparentely I am not first who is confused.
Its limiting understanding what those words mean to you and limiting understanding what those words mean to me and it looks like to some others because I am not the first one who is confused. I can say the same as you that you are refusing to learn that.
Am I the first one who is confused by the oxymoronic/nonintuitive description? It looks like I am not. We are in the age of social sites so maybe it would be better to describe it differentely and avoid these type of clashes? E.g. Turkey changed its spelling to Türkiye to minimaze the confusion.
I do not agree with you. That is not my understanding of the word religion in my language which is Czech.
No, but you have to believe that it is real. If someone will prove it I will have no problem with trusting that. Until then I am fine with budhism is a religion.
But that is science which is based on facts. I do not think that religion is based on facts.
Because you have the same word for ethnicity and religion. Which is a little confusing because I do not see them as one. But some people here does. I dont understand that.
Read those conversations once more and you will see that many people presented their ideas and views on religions like facts.
I view religious person as someone who believes ____. I said that it is my view of religion. It is my view not objective one neither is your view objective. We are discussing poeple believes which cant be objective by definition of the word believe. Your perspective doesnt make sense to me.
Sure, tell me how I think... Religion can also focus on bad things. It certainly can help some poeple to not do bad things but sadly it is double edged sword.
Yes.
Budhists believe in reincarnation, right?
Not in Czech language. Atheism can have both meanings. And it is also quite not exactely defined word in other languages.
I thought that my question before that was enough. Apperentely not for some people, but at least I got bunch of different opinions where only half of them were insulting to me and the other half was presenting their views on this topic.
I genuinely do not understand.
There are also different languages with different meanings of the same words or with multiple meanings of the translation. So no, one word doesnt mean that everybody will every time understands what the other side means.
No, I am not. I was actually part of protests after the 7th October and was wehementely fighting against Hamas propaganda by pinpointing thier lies. I just have different views on definitions of religion.
No, it wasnt polite. At least it sparked this discussion so I learned some things.
I said that I view a religious person as someone who believes ______ (something, entity/ies, nothing, presence, ethernity, like whatever). That is not the same as saying that he believes in God. And I view an atheist as someone who does not believe _____. Like we are just a bunch of organised atoms.
One. It just have to make sense to me. Now it doesnt so we do not agree on that view.
I do not agree with that. Empiric things are based on facts. I do not understand how it can be viewed differentely because religions are not based on facts.
That makes much more sense to me.
I can view him as nonreligious and he can view himself as religious. I do not see anything wrong about that. We just discribe things differentely.
And reincarnation, right?
No, I was saying like million times that this is how I view religion. And that I dont understand why they view it differentely. Do not try to spin it like that. I do not have to agree with your view of religion.
Because those words are contradicting themselfs in my view. Religion and atheism. So I do not understand how anyone can do both. Even after this discusion I do not understand that. But many people say that they view themselfs like that. It is wierd to me but I do not care what anyone believe.
Well, it is just our view of things. That cannot be right or wrong.
You do not understand what I mean. For me an atheist is someone who does not believe _____. Who does believe _____ is a religious person. And you cant be both. So my point of view is different than yours and others in this discusion. It doesnt mean that you have to agree with my definition.
In this discusion I found that some people say that they view themselfs as a religious atheists which doesnt make sense to me. So I do not understand them and they do not understand me and I am fine with that.
The fact is that they say that they view themself like that. And I do not understand thier experience. That doesnt mean that I oppose facts.
In my view of religion you have to believe _______. Than if you do not believe you are not religious to me. You are just part of some culture.
But that were actions. I do not care what anyone believe I just dont understand that. And if that believe is not harmful to me or others do whatever you want. WWII was evil just like China and Ujghurs, Russia and Ukraine, etc.
It is the same when someone tries to tell me what I have to think. We can just disagree and it is fine.
I dont know, you? It is just my opinion I am not trying to win. I think it is quite normal to be able to critisize anyone. There was plenty of different views so I learn a lot about how religious people view the world.
And that doesnt make sense to me.
Yes, today I learned a lot about how religious people view world.
Same here. I am also delighted to have my atheism explained to me by strangers.
And that is called opportunity. You will have some position, your thoughts will have more impact, you will have access to some things, etc.
If it is a religion of questioning this should be welcomed, right? So why to be tired of that?
I am learning a lot now actually. Learnig doesnt include agreement.
Yes, you have to believe into something. That is how I view a religion.
It doesnt have to be god. It can be anything. A thought. Whatever. You are implying that you know better tham me what I mean and what made me to think like this...
But my opinion doesnt overrides their religion. It just doesnt make sense to me. And Jew Jew is confusing. I think that it was part of many misunderstandings.
Yes, that is why I do not change my opinion on that because it doesnt make sense to me.
Agree, that is confusing.
There are no fact in belives.
It cant be fact because it is religion. Nobody will never know what other people believe or not. Because there is not any solid evidence of that. So it is not empiric. Why I have to change my mind? I just disagree with you.
Agreed.
Also it doesnt change my view on it because to me it doesnt make sense. Also it will not create any prejudices to Jews. I am totally fine that I do not understand why they do it and why they believe or not.
Where I said that I set the rules for that? I just shared my view on that because in my view of world it doesnt make sense. Thats all. Its totally fine if you disagree.
Well, I can say that a lot of people actually gives a fuck. Because there are like ganzilion replies. And they are trying to show me their view. Religion is not a fact based topic so you cant say who knows more.
Why I have to?
I just said that you can disagree with me so how is that making me an arbiter of definitions?