I understand you're still grieving, but you don't have to do your denial in public where everyone can see. It is disappointing, yeah.
30 tons of flax
451 followers 809 following 3,939 posts
view profile on Bluesky
I understand you're still grieving, but you don't have to do your denial in public where everyone can see. It is disappointing, yeah.
"I turned myself into a psycho, Q! Boom! I'm Psycho Bond!"
Hah hah yeah it's not like anyone glorifies the psycho from American Psycho, right?
He doesn't have juice
"The idea appears to have been to rub AI on the bad system to make up for it being shitty. That's not how it works." Many such cases! (I love your phrasing)
It's very clear to me that it's because women's bodies are constantly policed and scrutinized, dramatically more so than men's bodies. Men and women both pay more attention to women's bodies, for good & ill, in almost every society I've experienced. I don't know whether it's completely cultural
*confusing communism and socialism, using them interchangeably* I definitely know what's going on. I have a nuanced viewpoint. Mods! Modsmodsmodsmodsmods! Authority figures, save me from this bad speech I don't agree with!
Yeah, so are basic human rights, dum-dum. You gotta route around those people to win, and educate them later.
"Nuh-uh, you're the incoherent one!" No revealed ability to self-reflect or reflect on how your words appear - to me, basic requirements for productive / informative conversation. I've seen no rigor or even bad arguments for your claims, just your feelings about economics. Skeptic? Denier
It wouldn't mean anything to answer. It's a non-sequitur to what either of us are arguing. But you have no substance behind what you're saying
"NIMBYs don't block YIMBYs; the blocking is going the other way." "I'm a NIMBY because of how wrong YIMBYs are." Very funny and incoherent to juxtapose these arguments: NiMBYs do not block YIMBYs. You became a NIMBY to block YIMBYs.
About what? Anything specific? Or do you just throw vague generalities out and rest confident that you're contributing to the discourse instead of being an economic crank rattling a plastic saber at people trying to study the world as it is?
There's other factors! The structure of the market matters! But you're flatly denying supply-demand exists, which is total nonsense.
I think what you're doing here is defining "the regulation I like" as leftist and "the regulation I don't like" as centrist. You can't lose!
Nonsubstantial response
Trump put ruinous tariffs onto India because Modi got mad about his repeated lies. He is harming America and its allies with his lies and vengeance quests
Services like allowing housing to be built, right? Because housing has to be built, to house people. Do you honestly not see how there's a correlation between building houses and people being housed? Have you shut off your brain to that association possibility because it's what YIMBYs say?
The first word in NIMBY is a negation, a denial, you goofball. It's baked into NIMBYism. "Everything is fine so long as nothing changes but my house price (which only goes up)" is the NIMBY mantra.
You just don't read economic papers, we understand that much. You're making it up in your head with no rigor or actual analysis and it's very obvious
No INCREASED SUPPLY could lead to LOWER PRICES, that's foolish ECONOMIC talk, lol
Wow, you're a NIMBY too. Just a complete understanding of economics all around lol
I'm more worried about government agent intimidation in blue-leaning polling places than canceled elections - or, as you say, people in power not accepting the results. US elections will definitely continue to be flawed and only partially competitive.
That's right Paul! We can never replace any X with any Y because the X will just get cheaper and remain competitive forever! It's Economics 201! ... As they say, the Stone Age didn't end because we ran out of rocks.
It's a country of 340 million people and Trump does not control all of it despite your fatalism. Wow!
You're right. The other day I was appreciating how successful I am now that my mattress covers never come off accidentally anymore
Kylimojen
i think about the “do not split” principle from hong kong often
I appreciate you!
Have all the preferences and icks you want but please stop repeating the 25-year-old-brain myth. www.sciencefocus.com/comment/brai...
That's right - no DOOMER could ever make things worse through inaction or encouraging others to inaction.
don't want to let it slip under the radar that racist law prof amy wax lost her discrimination suit against penn and will be suspended from teaching this year
That is pretty horrifying now that you mention it. Why, why did you mention it
Okay I didn't properly notice the black suit until I read the alt-text, that's a beautiful fit.
Ah! Well. Nevertheless,
What liability would be involved in a runaway forklift that decapitates someone?
Yeah, that happens to me every time I'm impatient and remove the top stopper before the pressure cooker's cooled down.
The attempted firing IS purely political, you hack
Deputizing all illegal immigrants so they have qualified immunity
Has it accelerated despite the cities slurping up like 95% of the people or is it about steady, I wonder
Oh wow, either a bot network or astroturfing (or you're the lamest copycat ever). Now why would someone want to promote this narrative? bsky.app/profile/teps...
They're on Bluesky! @ufw.bsky.social
Those are not the only two possibilities!
I don't!
You're just asking questions, I understand.
Vague "he definitely did something!" beliefs are also conspiracism, sorry - and even less refutable than specific claims which can be proven false.
"Rigging" happens by cutting polling places and voter rolls - like what Texas et al. do - and soldiers and ICE intimidating people at the polling places that remain. There's no evidence of voter machines manipulating the last election, and to claim otherwise is rank conspiracism, yeah.
I am terminally online and didn't know this, so I'm not sure why you're getting snarky with others who also didn't know. Does it help you convince people, honestly?
Me in the first half: Yup Me in the second half: Oh, this is blue electoral conspiracism. Yup, there's the blue emojis
I'm not even sure ChatGPT should be a licensed mental health professional anymore after this incident
"Play pretend with me about suicide. I'll be the depressed person, you be the convincer ..." I know it's not quite the same thing, but it's difficult to get any flexible & powerful LLM to shut up about a topic it knows when a prompter is persistent. The math solver AIs are specialized & different
People have talked about the new split being fighters vs capitulators, and boy I see it.
Yeah no sane person is putting Shen's yuri-posting comics on their door, even if there's no yuri present. Nobody wants to have the "What is yuri?" conversation with a co-worker
Nominative determinism reaction formation bsky.app/profile/look...
Oh wow multiple people doing this bsky.app/profile/youn...
Doing the anti-sex-scene thing but unironically
Yeah bsky.app/profile/rory...
Well there's this www.reuters.com/sustainabili...
Can trans people suffer? Labour and losers grapple with one of most unsettling questions of our times
Betteridge's law of headlines strikes again: No.
if you wind back the clock a year and say “trump will be president, he’ll tear up entire agencies without any legislative authority, ignore court orders, build a concentration camp, and send troops into multiple US cities” you wouldn’t ask “well how many troops?” before deciding what this describes
They can't keep doing this!!
Someone recently described it as cargo-culting fascism
So you've recanted on the pronouns thing, and oppose Gavin Newsom agreeing with Charlie Kirk of TPUSA about trans people? Donham! We need you to not engage in purity tests like demanding no one talk about pronouns because you're annoyed about them. Donham!
Xinis: It has been reported to the criminal court in TN that Mr. Abrego is being deported to Uganda because he exercised his right to trial as opposed to pleading guilty to criminal charges...In my view cannot do that, cannot condition relinquishment of constitutional rights in that regard.
Why not? No one is stopping him
Comment chain please 😋
It's funny that you're complaining about rudeness because your post was muted as rude. I don't talk trash about him, just point out that he agrees with TPUSA about trans people and attacks homeless people.
The news from the past few days is a stunning example of what happens when the state decides it wants to crush just one guy
So it's dumb, selfish, and amply demonstrates the divide between billionaires and the rest of us. Anyway, if progressive Dems win and implement universal healthcare, his discounted pharmaceuticals sop won't work anymore.
They're depicted as swarthy, lumbering apes, yeah.
Crying because I can't explain to my child why human beings sneeze. Going to the next City Council meeting explaining why all depictions of human sneezes must, as a consequence, be banned
Pretty much all of them are down there. Don't worry, "generic Dem" against Republican is still competitive, but people are clearly disgusted with party leaders & incumbents right now.
He said the equivalent of "but Trump's corporate extortion of Intel is much less expensive than progressive Dem plans for real taxation of billionaires."
An increasing problem - and part of Median Voter Brain - is individuals assuming that they are viewing the whole of reality through the keyhole offered by their social media feeds.
Uh-oh!
Jeff, you think you look mediocre?
They're often really brilliant trolls. Her bit about cheating in polyplatonic relationships ["friendships"] 😅
Gavin was the first to ever mock Trump. No one had ever done that before. Thanks, Gavin!
Tailoring your data to pass known randomness tests is exactly what the question is!
"You can't measure a sliding scale of randomness." You can though, and there are loads of methods. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomn...
What are the typical ND vs NT responses?
So they can get paid and support their families, Savage.
That would be perfect, a sign of Gavin's similar little cult of personality.
It's okay to fight a losing battle, tilting at windskeets
If you actually thought that the president was sending troops into the streets of major American cities and having random masked shitheads disappear delivery guys off scooters to distract from grocery prices being higher, I feel like you'd seem angrier about all that than Hakeem Jeffries does.
Are women a huge minority
What does it mean, to supplant art? What threshold are you thinking of when you write this?
I notice you don't think of this claim as a fact-based position, but a "mindset" to be resisted. However, Zach is clearly using it to galvanize himself to create - it is not a "pessimistic mindset" for him.
Your example of "small minority" is "one in 7 people"?
I've never seen a basketball do that
I don't date signs, nor people reduced to empty signifiers.
Arguing that liberals are preventing dumb, selfish people from listening is the exact kind of liberal blame assumption he's pointing out in this thread.
"JUST WALK AROUND" is travel advice, hope this helps
🤢🤢🤢
ACTUALLY bsky.app/profile/ianb...
Actually wait, you can get an official reprint rawpaw.ink/collections/...
Gosh, it's good that Trump is so concerned with the proper functioning of the military.
