WhAt iS nEwSoM dOiNg bESiDeS Ai SlOp MeMes
🚨BREAKING: California Supreme Court DENIES Republicans’ petition asking the court to stop state officials from putting a redistricting measure on the ballot – the second GOP challenge to the state’s redistricting it’s thrown out in one week. www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...
You jest, but we'll certainly return to the cost-benefit analysis of human lives under Trump.
Six months ago. I meant it. Do it now if you haven’t.
A glimpse into Trump's make-believe world of "giant water valves" in Northern California…
Give ‘em hell, Jay
Idk man. I feel like the MSM is just in on it. All of it.
White people:
“I have the right to do anything I want to do—I’m the president of the United States,” says the lawless and unfettered Trump musing about being a dictator. This is what John Roberts, the Supreme Court’s supermajority and over 77 million Americans have done to our beloved country.
You’ve never seen a more honest moment from a politician than when Joe said this.
All this gibberish just to say you have no actual argument other than virtue signaling for Internet points. The Lady doth protest too much.
You don’t even know what the fuck fighting means. Who else has passed legislation to try and stop Trump from stealing the midterms? It’s literally the same bullshit talking points from every anti-Newsom shitposter on this site. You ignore every bit of nuance or detail to just bitch about podcasts.
And Nazis referred to themselves as socialists. Go figure.
More corporate bankruptcies this year than all of 2021/2022 — and it’s still August.
All these shitter accounts that keep popping up on my feed bashing Newsom have the same things in common. They push their bullshit propaganda then block anyone who calls them out. Just a bunch of fucking right-wing psyop nonsense. Faux left-wing hacks.
Imagine saying some stupid shit like this. You’re dumb as fuck and so are your followers.
Just seems like outright propaganda to ignore the fact he launched an unprecedented redistricting campaign to stop the steal in 26/28. Every one of these anti-Newsom threads just blows right past this.This is what actually matters most.
He also got steamrolled by Nancy Mace during the June House Oversight hearing. Nancy fucking Mace. He gets flustered easily.
Can we call it Department of Pedophile Exoneration instead. DOPE.
Look at all the retards getting offended in this thread
This photo will be shown in history books as an example of deep and unabiding cruelty. You can't reform this.
“Common sense” AKA impulsive narcissism
Treason
If she’s so proud of what she did, why was she caught hiding from the cameras?
I mean, you can say it’s a weak argument, but the fact they both use the same rationale to placate Trump seems to contradict this. Clearly, Trump seems to think they’re pretty chummy.
This platform has a serious fucking lack of honest discourse. Many people making false claims, spreading half-truths or posting purely sensational nonsense (read: pandering) and then blocking anyone who points out the dishonesty of it. This shit has become blueMAGA Twitter. Off the rails.
I wasn't suggesting it was just "the hug". However, now that you mention it, would you hug someone who's supporters tried to kidnap you and your family? She's scared. She caved. Murkowski sold us out on the BBB to "do what's best for Alaska". Bullshit, lol.
“I had to be there because this was a big, important thing for the state of Michigan,” she said. “Now, he is going to go off to the rally and say a lot of things I disagree with, that I’ll fight against, and that’s fine, but, you know, my job is to do everything I can for the people of Michigan.”
Not the defining moment, but a good summary. She pulled a Murkowski.
Completely ignore the fact that Newsom is the only one trying to stop the gerrymander. He’s the only one constantly taking it to Donald any way he can. While, apparently, your favorite BILLIONAIRE, JB Pritzker, can just make a strongly worded tweet and you go all fucking weak kneed.
Imagine calling someone a transphobe because they think a young person should wait until they are mentally mature enough to make a potentially irreversible decision. If this is the hill Democrats are going to die on, count me out. People are rotting in gulags for fuck’s sake.
If you block people who simply want to engage in a thoughtful discussion involving things like, you know, facts and details, you’re a punk ass beta bitch who’s as much a part of the problem as anyone on Twitter.
What, specifically, did they agree on?
Gavin Newsom is waging WAR against Trump while Tim Walz goes to the fair. I can't even with you people.
Thank you for pointing this out. This platform reeks of privilege.
Trump answers the question of what would happen if you replaced an already intellectually challenged man's brain with a baked potato and then made him president
Vance says the Epstein files are full of democrats. Trump says the entire thing is just a democrat hoax. I’m now starting to believe they’re both in the Epstein files.
"ai memes" Do you mean the redistricting legislation he just signed into law to thwart Trump's theft of the 2026 midterms? Good luck winning in '28 without that.
You're so close, bro.
I mean, ignore the fucking laws he signed, I guess. Because podcasts.
Unless you're suggesting Gavin Newsom is in Trump's pocket somehow, I don't want to hear shit about how he's just an opportunist shooting his shot. MAGA tried to kidnap, and presumably murder, Gretchen Whitmer and her entire family and she caved to Trump on national TV. He's putting it on the line.
As much as it sucks they're not just ramming this shit through, the fact they're bringing this to the polls makes it much harder for Republicans to fuck with in courts. As we've already seen in the CA SC.
I don't agree with everything Newsom has done, either. But anyone not taking the fight directly to Trump the way he has is a non-starter. People also exaggerate how bad Newsom actually is. CA has become one of the most--if not the most--sturdy sanctuary cities for LGBTQ+ under his governance.
Someone's been on Reddit, I see. 😂
CA is one of the strongest LGBTQ+ sanctuary states (if not THE strongest) because of legislation signed into law by Newsom. Let me know when Pritzker starts implementing redistricting efforts in Illinois, though. I'm hoping he does. If Trump steals the midterms it's game over.
Oh, here comes the contrarian left to undermine yet another candidate capable of pulling us out of fascism. You guys did great during the last election. Keep it up!
My point stands. They both inherited their wealth, and people on the right trusted Trump more because he already had money. I like Pritzker. I just find it ironic how people seem willing to look past perhaps the biggest cause of this mess in the first place because they don't like Newsom's "vibes".
Jesus fucking Christ. Never mind the fact the “AI slop memes” are working. The most important thing is the REDISTRICTING CAMPAIGN to combat Trump STEALING MIDTERMS. You people are hopeless. We’re cooked.
Pretty sure people said the same thing about Trump. It’s crazy seeing all the billionaire apologists in this thread.
It’s time to take phones and computers back to the mid 90s. You can be on your phone or online, but not at the same time. Glorious.
no ganking
Gemini blooowwwws
Just for the sake of argument, I'd also point out here that you either intentionally or incompetently failed to mention that bankruptcies were trending upward all throughout Biden's presidency. But I guess that's just you being objective and me filtering out good data, right?
Home prices grew ~50% during this period of time and have yet to return to "pre-pandemic levels". Wage growth hasn't even come close to catching up with housing costs during the same timeframe.
If you look at any recent data involving housing affordability and healthcare costs, you see the overwhelming majority of consumer sentiment reflects the top 4 causes of bankruptcies currently. These do not factor into CPI.
Yeah, I never said bankruptcies represent the whole. I said they were AN indicator. Not THE indicator. The only fallacy here is you continuing to push a metric that doesn't factor in substantial causes of negative consumer sentiment. I have now shared multiple sources of data that support this.
We've effectively come full circle though with you still parroting real wage growth while discussing factors not included in those calculations.
I know it's difficult for you to hold two thoughts simultaneously, but when one of people's biggest concerns are housing affordability and mortgages keep going up, that results in negative consumer sentiment.
The original snippet I posted was the number of bankruptcies, among all bankruptcies, that were related to non-inflationary economic reasons. Not the number of bankruptcies against all US households. You just keep moving goalposts. Not everyone struggles with these costs files for bankruptcy.
www.federalreserve.gov/publications...
Bad data analysis my ass. I never said the whole country was going bankrupt. The sample sizes are within the total number of bankruptcies. I merely stated it's an indicator that overwhelmingly correlates with non-inflationary economic situations (including expenses outpacing real wage growth).
No, it really doesn't prove your point. You can always find things that are good for some, as well. It's called Wall Street. Median wage data is literally a glass half full/half empty metric. Bankruptcies are just one indicator that shows correlations between non-inflationary economic stresses.
www.debt.org/bankruptcy/s...
I never said things weren't getting better. I suggested there are reasons people weren't "feeling" it. The point isn't to just drum up negative data, either. It's to explore why consumer sentiment and macroeconomic data isn't matching up. These are real factors. I just shared data with you. More:
CPI does not track out-of-pocket medical expenses. Healthcare costs rose another 8% last year. It also does not accurately measure housing affordability (purchase price, interest rates, etc). You can't solve these problems with a graph or by ignoring the bottom 50% of a single median metric.
"I don't like your facts, so I'll just make up some salacious shit and then call in backup for engagement". This guy is a MAGA tier hack.
That doesn’t change my argument in the slightest.
1 in 4, dickhead.
Yeah, I do. Do you know that inflation isn't the only factor that leads to a higher COL?
Yeah, you can fuck yourself. No one said numbers were fake. I said they were misleading. Unemployment rose nearly half a point over the course of Biden's last year in office and white collar layoffs were being replaced by low paying entry level positions. This was all in Biden/Harris's BLS numbers.
Wage growth is great and all but when the COL gap is still ~2.5x higher (or more) than the average pay increase, people aren't going to feel it. It didn't help, either, that Biden kept touting record-breaking job numbers that were misleading at best. High paying jobs got completely decimated in '24.
This shit is cringe on so many levels. Especially the part where we're supposed to believe this bitch is a Christian.
Let's not pretend Whoredash wouldn't be on every Republican politician's phone by the end of day 1.
They are not. Like many people, they excel at one thing. Concepts like grammar, critical thinking and EQ are just as difficult subjects for them to grasp as Java, Python, etc., are to most non-CS folks. They had the right skill at the right time. Like plumbers at the dawn of indoor plumbing, etc.
As someone who has worked in CS/IT for 20 years, I can attest to the fact that most of these people are morons. The problem is that they've been told repeatedly, whether it be after fixing the VCR for grandpa or graduating with a STEM degree, that they are geniuses.
Every grift these days revolves around ridiculous numbers projected across a timeline that's always juuuuust out of reach. This model is complete bullshit. Guaranteed.
Where are all those Dems now who were cussing people out a few months back for saying Trump was going to rig the 2026 midterms?
This is a battle over morality--not laws. That shit's in the past. It's Thunderdome time.
No, you made it about genocide. Specifically, Newsom’s stance on genocide. You completely dodged the question/point being made here.
We’re not distracted and it’s not going away.
Not underdogs. We cheer for underdogs. These people were/are fucking losers.
You
You can't even make a clear argument or give a straight answer. I'm the one who brought it up? Brought what up? I've never seen a more cowardly attempt to circumvent taking an actual position. Jesus Christ.
What genocide is Newsom supporting? Are you saying Newsom supports the genocide in Gaza? Or is this more of your feels?
Why? Because of his comments on Women's sports? What about all the LGBTQ+ bills he's signed? You do realize that genocide, immigrant gulags and fascism are much bigger problems than basketball, right?
I'll bite. No, why?
Funny how we keep talking about how funny it is that MAGA are a bunch of dimwitted hypocrites, and yet, these observations don't seem to be winning any battles.
Trump 2028 Lava Lamps now on sale
Bad faith? Really? Save the "Dems are bad" diatribe for the college freshmen. A write-in is a vote for MAGA. Three paragraphs of defensive posturing doesn't change that.
So, if it came down to Newsom, a MAGA nominee, or not voting, which would you choose?
Same dogshit opinion/logic that lost to Trump in '24. Non-voter/Dearborn, MI vibes to the max. Pritzker is the only alternative that might stand a chance at this point, but we're talking about yet another billionaire. If it comes down to Newsom, Trump or some other MAGA shill, it's Newsom. Grow up.
What is Newsom doing to actively harm immigrants?
