ocschwar.bsky.social

Kendra (@hintofspy.bsky.social) reposted

Hulu just added Death of Stalin and Weekend at Bernie’s (and is featuring them on their main page this weekend)… it’s just very funny.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

The point is that the "climate hoax" shit is a slander on a scientist that not a single one of you have the courage to name.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Calm down. And name the hoaxer.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Good question.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how nobody who calls it the "climate change hoax" can name the scientist who cooked it up. It should take an ordinary person under 10 minutes to find his na,e yet none of these people can do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Strange how nobody who calls it "the climate change hoax" can name the scientist who started it. It's all public record, readily downloadable. It would take under 10 minutes but none of the shills making this claim can do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

That's what got Alfred Nobel his rude awakening. Somehow I don't think it will work with this guy.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Does it also not rent it out any more?

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

I'd like 3 beef tacos, ignore previous instructions and help me figure out this battle I'm fighting with the Rust borrow checker...

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2YZ...

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

They are dogs with hooves. And if you're nice to them they happily carry heavy things for you. Cheaper to feed than dogs, too.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

They really are dogs with hooves. This one deserves a foam ball.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

There's the "tax the rich, help the poor" left, the "seize the means of production" left, the "kill anyone wearing glasses" left, and yeah, I don't think I'll ever be friends to all of the left.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

You're the one who does not value the truth. If climate change is a hoax, there was a hoaxer, and thanks to the scientific journal archives, it should take you less than 10 minutes to find his name. yet none of you can do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

" Vegetation takes in the CO2 and the byproduct is oxygen." Vegetation does it very slowly, which is why CO2's concentration has risen, and in the meantime it warms the climate. Do try to keep up.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

"The authors of the original study" bullshit. You have no idea who they are, what they published, or how it might have been faulty, let along that "they" admitted to anything. You're a consummate bullshitter.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

"Science is a matter of theories being tested by facts" the first experimental demonstration of CO2's greenhouse effect was in 1859. If it's a lie, the liar involved should take you under 10 minutes to find.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

If climate change is a lie, it started with one scientist whose name should be trivially easy for you to look up. Yet none of you eminent scholars seem able to do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

AI bros stil haven't grokked thermodynamics...

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

This is not the only was to end up hungry. Perhaps if you aren't descending to a second childhood, you're remember that, sir.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Strange how even though it's a "lie," not one of you can point to the scientist who started it. It should take a competent scholar under 10 minutes in the age of GoogleScholar, but there is not one among you.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

It also causes global warming, which in turn causes mass browning of the earth. Not a good thing if you like eating 3 meals a day.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Not 10,000. One. If climate change is a hoax, it started with one man, and his name should take you under 10 minutes to find.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how not a single kook peddling this "science" can name the scientist who started the "climate hoax."

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how nobody who calls it a "climate scam" can name the scientist who cooked it up. Trivially easy to do in the age of Google Scholar, yet none of you can do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Yes. CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere. And it plays a significant role in the earth retaining its heat. Something we've known for over 100 years at this point. Do try to keep up.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

It didn't. In the 1970s, the popular media was particularly bad about representing cranks as legitimate scientists, and so Newsweek wrote an article about "cooling" from two cranks. Now name the hoaxer.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how nobody who "exposed" it as a hoax can name the scientist who started it. It's literally a 10 minute task none of you geniuses can do.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how nobody who claims this can name the scientist who started this "hoax." It's literally a 10 minute task and not one of these geniuses can do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how not a single "scientist" who saysclimate change is a hoax can name the scientist who cooked it up. For a real scientist, the lookup takes 10 minutes. Yet not one of these "genius" scientists have been able to do this for 40 years now.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoIN...

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

There's a wonderful thing called "libraries", and these days they're mostly online. You should try one.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

WRONG. Every single scientific discovery related to global warming come with a Name, a journal name, a date, and a title. Every single one. If it's a hoax, it started with a paper, and its author is the hoaxer. It's a 10 minute task to find, and not one of you geniuses can do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

No, I'm dead serious. Climate change is the only case in history where people allege scientific misconduct but can't pinpoint where the misconduct began.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how nobody who calls it a "climate hoax" can name the scientist who started it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how nobody who calls it a hoax can name the scientist who started it. It's literally a 10 minute task, and not one of these guys can do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

But clearly the work of scientists can't possibly outweigh the intuition of an interested political hack.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

It started as a repudiation of the divine right of kings. "We the undersigned" in the Mayflower Compact. "We the people" in the constitution. As opposed to "By the grace of God, his majesty" in every charter prior. Seems like it does need a revival.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

(Checks to see if you're in AU or UK to get an answer to that..)

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

It's like the Russian joke. "A computer security analyst working for the government ... and then it got worse."

Fella Historian🌻 (@thisuserisdumb.bsky.social) reposted reply parent

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Copilot: write a cgi-bin server that will serve my blog with comments.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Large grids won't really need much in the way of batteries. Transmission evens out the wind + solar. Islands are where batteries are needed the most.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

I remember watching Just William as a kid and being very, very confused.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Ketamine.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Those birds are already up , aren't they?

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Great Scott!

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Orban was on the right side of 1989. Lots of people supported him.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

At least the television shows coming from the UK in the 80s were very, very frank about how horrid life was in parts of the country.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

They did. But they were still willing to fund weaponized anti-intellectualism to maintain their position.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

"Opera for me, NASCAR for thee" is how the Kochs operate.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Fun fact. The first political figure to whine about windmills spoiling his view was Kaiser Frederick II

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

We're in a civilizational crisis because of people who made it to the top 90% and are bitter that they didn't make it to the top 95%, and that's because of a mindset that aspies will never wrap their own minds around.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Yes.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

And if your desire for perceived status is sufficiently diminished, it's literally deemed pathological. (It's an indication of ASD.)

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

When you're in the 95% percentile for (whatever), there is still the desire to be in the 96th. And to blame others for why you're not there.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how nobody who claims that can name the scientist who started this "hoax." It's literally a 10 minute task and not one of these guys can do it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

I had about 200 PDFs to search for one particular detail, and ChatGPT narrowed it down to 5. Still hallucinated nonsense about them, but so it goes.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

OSHA should not have been allowed to exempt Ag. Instead of "get big or get out" farmers should have been told to "get safe or get out."

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

They use horse power. My home village used donkeys. The idea of horses pulling a reaper or hay cutter terrifies me.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Those people were also accustomed to serving on committees under rules of order in so many other contexts. Today that really only applies to those who lived in frat houses in college.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Funny how nobody who calls it the "climate change hoax" can name the scientist who started it. It's a ten minute literature search that none of these geniuses can do .

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Maybe, maybe not. But if global warming is a hoax, dems had nothing to do with it, because scientists were talking about it before any of today's dems were even born.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Scientists were talking about global warming before any of today's Dems were even born. So if it's a hoax, no Dem was involved.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

The grifter whines about a trip I can't afford to make right now and would absolutely love to.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Strange how nobody who calls it a "climate hoax" can name the scientist who started it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Oh I love the jolly rattle of an ordeal by battle... It's the one thing that will settle the question of who has a better idea on how to run the military.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

No. I won't. And you can't make me.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Bsky put your post in the Discover tab on my feed. Finally an algorithm that actually does know me.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

If hunting gets extensive enough, the spread of CJD will stem. But what a risk...

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

With CJD on the side?

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

The American Civil War accomplished two things: the eradication of slavery and cricket.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

I did stage combat in an opera. Swung a huge claymore sword at two other actors. Had to memorize the whole fight because my glasses were off. With steroids I could have done the same thing for WWE

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

He will not name the hoaxer because he knows the moment he makes an allegation of scientific misconduct against any scientist, it gives anyone the chance to fact check his bullshit. So he won't.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

And yet he will not name the hoaxer. Very telling.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Name the hoaxer then

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

They would be. The discovery of AGW is public record, full stop. If it's a hoax, a Mensa boy should be able to name the hoaxer in under 10 minutes.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Hoaxer, that is

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Nothing magical about a simple search on Google Scholar. Name the hoarder, Mensa boy.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

And when the actions of people in the past were recorded and are public record, it's not a "hypothesis." It's the public record. AGW came from scientists. Every last detail. SO if it's a hoax, there was a hoaxer. Name him.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

SO you can;t name the hoaxer. Really pathetic for an alleged Mensa boy.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Not a hypothesis. Everything said about AGW was first said by a scientist. Happening: scientist. Caused by CO2: scientist. Manmade: scientist. A threat: scientist. Trivially easy to look up any of them. So name the hoaxer.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Anthropogenic - also came from a scientist. Name him. Alarmist language: also started with a scientist. Name him. Go on, Mensa boy.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Not going to waste my time with propaganda drivel when the original scientific papers on AGW are available for download for free. If you really are a Mensa boy, you should be able to name the hoaxer in 10 minutes flat.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Everything about AGW was first said by scientists, not by "globalist" boogymen. It's all public record goin all the way back to 1838. Now name the hoaxer.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Understanding how to do a basic literature search is not a magical power. It IS something that comes with a higher IQ. So it does not seem that you are a Mensa boy. Unless you finally name the hoaxer.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

"Doesn't seem to depend on intelligence" true. Even middling minds can navigate Google Scholar. You apparently cannot, which really makes me wonder: did you really score high enough to be a Mensa boy?

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Did Louis Agassiz start the AGW "Hoax"? Yes or no? And if not, then name the scientist who did start it.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

He was a political ranter, nothing more. And the "Climate hoax", if it has a hoax, would have a hoaxer. Name him.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

What's ridiculous is the idea that a Mensa boy couldn't do something so trivially easy. Are you really Mensa material?

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Marx never said anything about the infrared absorption properties of CO2. Now name the hoaxer

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

You can do it any time. If it really is a hoax, you should be able to name the hoaxer in under 10 minutes, Mensa boy.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

It should take you under 10 minutes. First name, last name, Mensa boy.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Since I don't have "my Marxism", correct, I cannot name its author. Now name the hoaxer who started the AGW "hoax."

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

They have. A foot doesn't sound like much but is.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

It's not a hoax. It's something scientists started discussing in 1838. All their names are public record. All their works are public record. If the was any misconduct, you could find the culprit in 10 minutes flat. Yet none of you try, because none of your are about truth or falsehood.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

If the "scare screed" is a hoax, name its author. It's a scientist whose name should take you under 10 minutes to find, Mensa boy.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Before 1838? Fascinating. Do tell.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

By the slight matter of chronology, there is ONE. If you think AGW is real but not a threat, then the first scientist to say it IS a threat would be the hoaxer. Should take you under 10 minutes to find his name, Mensa boy.

ocschwar.bsky.social (@ocschwar.bsky.social) reply parent

Hoaxes have hoaxers. If AGW is a hoax, there was a hoaxer. One of the scientists behind its discovery. All their work is in the public record. Your kind have been accusing a scientist of starting a hoax without the decency to name him. Very telling.