Starmer had one shot to fix the country. Rejoin S/M, implement P/R, + press & social media reg => ultimately bring us down from the frenzied radicalisation & echo chambers. He's fucked up on all of it. He probably will be ousted.
Starmer had one shot to fix the country. Rejoin S/M, implement P/R, + press & social media reg => ultimately bring us down from the frenzied radicalisation & echo chambers. He's fucked up on all of it. He probably will be ousted.
3,356 days have elapsed since the #Brexit referendum. Plenty of time for any party to discuss a strategy. Maybe tomorrow?
Sorry, but I wouldn’t trust any labour member to run the country, especially the way they have run places like London and Manchester into the ground, as criminal activity is higher under labour and under the conservatives
Manchester: despite being Labour-controlled, has seen crime falling by 8% in the last year, which directly contradicts the implied premise that Labour governance leads to higher crime rates. London: Overall violence in London is significantly lower than in the 1990s. Shoplifting is another thing !
Are you for real??
Do you live in London or Manchester?
Of course s/he doesn’t !
Probably never been to either!
Manchester has a superb public transport system (free to many),great cultural life and seems to be thriving! I love visiting it!
Far too early for this assessment. I will wait three years to make a judgment, which I believe is a fair amount of time. They have made some improvements in our relationship with the EU, and hopefully that will continue.
In fairness to Starmer he never stipulated that “change” meant change for the better… This is all bang on though. It’s been over a year & everything is worse. Labour are in a terminal death dive & they just stare blankly into the camera…
100% that Starmer will lose the 2029 election. That much was clear from his first 6 months. Main reason apart from this govt’s incompetence and ceding of ground to far right is of course press support for Farage. He will give them what they want - lower taxes for wealthy.
That was never his agenda
Hmm - wishful thinking I’m afraid. Still 4 years to go and however much the frog-faced fascist and the rabid, right wing media might wish it, the Labour govt are in it for the long haul.
He's purged everyone decent who could oust him. Actually, he's purged everyone who could oust him. A bit like Blair but more swingeingly.
Starmer said difficult choices have to be made before the election, that was a warning, been cock ups over the WFA and trying to take on the disabled, which need protecting from the government
McSweeney has killed Labour and Starmer was a willing accomplice. I don't think I could be any more disappointed in a Labour Government as I am right now. Instead of focusing on Farage, concentrate on making peoples lives better but I fear it is already too late for Labour.
He's in Murdoch's pocket, was never go to happen. Until media barons are illegal along with lobbyists and wealthy donors, it'll never change. Anyway, have a lovely Sunday 😄
Although I appreciate your viewpoint, it's important to understand that the Bluesky community constitutes only a small portion of the wider population. Despite the popularity of this post, Starmer is poised to continue making substantial contributions over the next three years.
I admire your hope. But the chess pieces remain the same. Growth unlikely outside of SM, authoritarianism will grow without P/R. McSweeny has led Labour to a colossal collapse in polling. Contributions will be mis-represented to public without Press & Social Med regulation. He will be rounded on.
It is fortunate that this is merely your perspective. Speaking for myself, my life has demonstrably improved under the current government over the past year, and I am optimistic that the rest of the UK will soon experience a similar positive shift following the October budget.
I really truly do hope that you are right.
Fingers crossed, they make the right decisions. 🤞🏻
On Winter Fuel Allowance ? On PIP ? Issues that resonated with the public , not easily forgotten.
The Winter Fuel Allowance adjustment has been reinstated following the recognition of a prior error. PIP remains unchanged, with its implementation scheduled for November 2026, allowing ample time for disabled individuals to secure necessary support.
The welfare cuts will never be forgotten. There’s already a campaign to get my labour MP out because of them, and she’s definitely going to lose her seat and I’ll be pleased about it. They’re governing like tinpot Tories and nobody in their right mind is voting labour again.
He's doing fine IMO 14 years of neglect and now people blame the government in charge Get real.
Dog whistling like Farage, saying the same, come here by boat you be deported, should be taking the fight to Farage, going to lose the election unless he changes tact and fires McSweeney and others advising his idiocy
I hear you, but whatever he does it will be misrep'd and disinfo'd. So without the growth SM would deliver, without regulations to temper the bullsh*t => his polling will continue to suffer.
The problem is with better comms people will learn that if anything Labour are even worse than they thought. We are we making excuses for Starmer re: the media? It was always true that they’d be hostile, Lab have a massive majority & can do something about it. I’m afraid they *want* all this.
Agreed. Tory rags. At least they have 3 years. The health minister sickens my heart BTW. Corruption in plain sight. He has to go.
This is pure fantasy - as if anyone in UK politics could achieve these things in current climate. Rejoining the SM is obviously a good thing but clearly the country is not ready yet - it would mean FoM which ended up being the biggest single cause of Brexit.
This is an excellent point that seems to get overlooked. Imagine Farage, the Media and the Neanderthals if the borders were opened again and those 'forriners' were let in!
Starmer MUST be jailed: breaking international law & commitments to participate in genocide, taking decisions w/out parliament to embed Blackrock & Palantir in govt, sending troops & spy planes to Israel. All jailable offences. Aside from immorality in inciting hate towards migrants.
🤞
His priority should have been shoring up democracy. Instead he pandered to Trump and allowed Reform to surge because he’s too scared to actually fight back against rightwing populism because he’d upset Trump
Yes, let's tell Trump the trips off because we can't deal with criminals who back Russia and Isreal. He says, no more, British made cars to US, and cancels all Uk visas to the US. Great, then what. He's trying to deal with a maniacal child.
He is. But any short term damage limitation will mean nothing long term if Britain gets a Reform government and Trumpism takes hold in the country.
Pandering to the moronic criminal must be awful for him but for now it is necessary for our economy and for some kind of unity in support of Ukraine. For now. There will be a point when it’s no longer sustainable or morally defensible. Could be months
The economic consequences of upsetting Trump would be deadly to the rebuild of our shaky economy while stroking the maniacs ego minimised the damage and cost nothing. His pandering to Reform's anti-immigration policies is way less understandable but one thing is sure. It's not for Trump.
Correct
Incorrect. Starmer can’t possibly say “look how awful rightwing populism is” because it’s impossible to make that case without describing Trump’s agenda. And he can’t do that because he’s tied his fortunes to Trump and can’t offend him.
Nonsense. It's the apparent popularity of Reform that he seems to be running scared from. It's a social media game and Starmer doesn't know how to play.
He won’t argue against them. He could be saying - look at Farage’s links with Trump. Look at his admiration for Trump and Reform’s antidemocratic tendencies. It isn’t nonsense. Being friendly with Trump makes it impossible to make that argument.
That would work fine for ppl like us. Reform UK like Trump. Most ppl in UK don’t know/care what Trump is doing. So I’m afraid to say, dull as it is, Starmer’s policy is right - for now, but circs will change. Trumps links with Putin (and Epstein) are obvious yet incredibly unproven for many
The UK has been friends with America for a long time. Every PM since the 'Special Relationship' began has kissed the ring as it were to every POTUS to an embarrassing degree and without compromising at home policies. Same now.
Damned if you do damned if you don’t etc etc - 2025. Send help. Ends…
Absolutely, Starmer is protecting the country from Trump, he has no other option and he's doing a good job of it. He's also built excellent relationships with the Europeans too, absolutely essential. He's worked it well. You must've been asleep not to recognise the importance of his roles here.
How can you say he’s protecting the country from Trump when Reform’s poll lead is getting larger and larger. In four years time the UK will have a Trumpist government because of Starmer’s refusal to push back against rightwing populism! Where’s the success in that?
Reform is leading in the polls due to numerous factors, appeasement of Trump isn't one of them, every single British PM has done the same in order to protect the British economy.
Yes if is. Labour can’t use the strongest argument there is against Farage - look at how Trump is destroying democracy, Farage would sell us out to him and do the same thing here. Because they can’t make that argument Reform has free rein to set the agenda.
Trump is almost universally hated in the UK. And yet, in the next election, we'll probably elect a Trumpist party. That's how thick a huge chunk of the electorate is.
What you're saying is entirely correct. I was saying that appeasing Trump, as embarrassing as it is, is a necessary move to protect the economy from his destructive tendencies, and most of the country realise that. Labour is floundering due to numerous factors, this isn't one of them.
It is. It is Labour’s biggest failing. Not pushing back against rightwing populism and defend democracy. Not even trying to win the argument about the direction the country is going. It’ll cost them their prospects of reelection.and lead to a Reform government. Exactly what happened to Biden.
Its why establishment parties (like the GOP and, let's face it, Reform) position themselves as outsiders. Labour will never win by positioning as Sensible Reform, and whilst they are doing so, they'll turn off a huge chunk of their actual base. They need to pick something they actually stand for
I guess what's frustrating is that Labour is crawling with political strategists and data wonks, and yet they are completely ignoring the main driver of modern politics, which is a marketing technique called "challenger brand strategy". I need to sit down and write a post about it...
Trump should serve as an example to the world of how badly life can become under a dictator. Canada was leaning conservative & learned from the mistake the US made and they flipped their vote to liberal. Australia followed suit and voted their leader back in - something they hadn’t done in decades.
Exactly. But that's how dumb we are. Voting for Brexit was dumb. Voting for Trump the first time was dumb. Voting for Trump a second time was almost unbelievably dumb but Voting for Reform in 2029 will be dumber still.
If my country reelecting Trump was failing an open-book exam, Britain electing a Reform government right after Vance possibly loses would be failing an open-book ONLINE exam.
Honestly I don't know what the US will look like in 2029, but yes this is a great analogy
Yet every state that pushed back against Chump got tariff deadlines extended or tariffs reduced. Starmer just rolled over. Chump doesn't know what to do when he's told No, he just flails. Standing up to Chump would also serve to highlight economic protections we previously enjoyed in the EU also
Unlike the EU which is facing 30% tariffs we got the minimum 10%. It is a nonsense to say that all that sucking up gained us nothing.
Tariffs are the instrument Trump is using to exert influence. Britain got a lower rate but at a pride. Starmer can’t speak out against rightwing populism because to do so would offend Trump. It’s a massive price since it currently looks like it will give Britain a Reform government
When standing our ground would likely have got us three months of no extra tariff and then still ended up with a reduced amount or a further 'extension'
Not quite what happened to those who stood their ground with that infantile US president.
I just hope that, if he does get dumped, they don’t find someone who simply perpetuates all the mistakes. Needs a fresh pair eyes, a complete clean sweep of advisers and comms team at No.10, a chancellor who is not in thrall to the bankers and a new start. They’ve only got one shot at this.
I really hope so, but I can’t see it happening. Who do you think would or could replace him? Labour’s only chance is to replace him before it’s too close to the next GE, and bring in someone with honesty and the courage to fight populism, not try to ape it
He was always just a seat warmer me for the establishment. He’s a Tory stooge and always has been.
Not only did he have one shot, it was also a huge open goal to shoot at too No reason to fail, huge mandate to simply crack on @teamlabouruk.bsky.social #LabourHaveFailed
None of these were part of the manifesto. Get a grip!
Correct, but those are the jobs that were required. Everything else is secondary.
As you can see Starmer-stans (& unfortunately the Starmer team) don’t even see the problem. We’re fecked
“Chris Rivers” looks like a labour bot to me. Block and ignore.
Starmer-stans are like overconfident paperclip salesmen (& they’re *always* men), literally the dullest people you’ll ever meet…
It’s like the boys club at the top of government (as it’s been described by labour MPs). There is no way back unless they change direction, their morale will keep getting battered with by election losses and then they’ll get routed in the 2026 locals. They’re pretty much done already.
It’s very hard to see how they come back from this, especially since so few of them are willing to even admit there’s a problem. They just thought they could get a technocrat into office & the economy would grow & that’s it. Er, it’s not the 90s anymore
Yes in part. He could also have begun the process of replacing the UK with a British Confederation and written constitutions enshrining the ECHR. Don't forget, Britain is a multinational, multicultural and multilingual space. It is not a singular country.
Yes. But those of us on the left saw all of this coming. But did liberals listen? No, we were told to wheesht for Starmer and his New Labour 2.0 project. We told you so.
That idiot trying to copy Farage over immigration as well, he lose that battle, still vote for that maniac and Starmer will alienate the left and centre, absolute useless as Prime Minister
He has been so disappointing. He needs to look and listen to what the majority of their supporters want, instead of running scared of every corrupted media headline. If he took a stand, he would find that he has strong support instead of bending with the wind every day.
Unfortunately by Frogface Farage
It’s been a year , with a very hostile media , the country had already gone to shit before labour were elected . If you expected it to be sorted out already then you’ve got rocks in your head .
If they'd put in Press Reg, Social Media Reg, hostile media ceases to be a problem. Democratic, critical press? Fine. Frenzied, disinfo pamphlets and newspaper-powered broadcast-media? Ridiculous.
I agree with that , but I don’t think changing PM is the answer just yet , we had that with the Tories , what was it 3 Prime ministers in one term .
Yep. Johnson => Truss => Sunak in one Parliament. And at one point they were plotting a 4th.
If they neutered the press people would, quite rightly, be outraged. It’s possible to accept that the mainstream media is mostly lying to you, and ignore the nonsense they spew each day, including the laughable claim that Farage is the next PM.
I don't mind the press being free to say whatever they like, but things like Paper Reviews should be a 50/50 left/right split. Newspapers themselves perhaps also. No *one* owner shud be able to own another medium of news (see Murdoch, Marshall, Rothermere) Opinion should be OFF front pages.
Any paper review should be boringly forensic about WHY that opinion is in that specific publication. The context should always be at least as important as the content. And that 'why is x publication saying this?' should also mention the ownership and their political aims. Papers are levers.
Oh I agree. I just don’t think any political party should be allow to silence the media, as awful as that media may be.
Thanks for your personal wish list.
I appreciate it looks like that but save for a tax increase here and there my personal situation looks unlikely to change much. The country, as a whole, requires a return to democratic normality, calm/reasoned thought; The way we get there is regulation. That is the reality.
Can't wait for the day when this racist c*nt will be sent packing. Anyway, he should be sent to The Hague for his support of genocide!
Yet it’s only been a year 🤔
Year of mistakes apart from locking up the far right rioters
His mistakes are winter fuel should have been scaled in He should tax farmers land NI rise to employers should have been targeted on Multiple Nationals Immigration policy with safe entry He should talk about the single market and talk about SME Good international relations Good on NHS
Forgot to add going after the disabled until a rebellion happened
No one would have voted Labour if they had said Brexit was a disaster l or the media needs reform. No one knew the extend or direction of US madness. No one knew the funding that would fall into Farage’s lap and no one could predict how mental some British people actually are. Stop blaming Labour
Sorry to disagree, but plenty of people warned that tRump would act like a dictator and destroy US democracy. Sadly, too many others couldn’t believe it, or were too cowardly/self-interested to stop him.
The speed of his madness, the extent of others’ complicity and the powerlessness of institution were not predicted. Likewise the real life disruptive consequences for other leaders, their time energy and focus on mitigating his blabbings and actions.
"No one would have voted Labour if they had said Brexit was a disaster" - 2/3 agree it was a mistake. "..or the media needs reform". - 70% do not trust media as is. "No one knew the extent of US madness" - Trump was talking about Tariffs, rounding up immigrants since 2018. I could go on.
Very clever. I’m old enough to know that facts like these mean NOTHING when it comes to voting. People will use any excuse to vote Tory/etc. Yes the Daily Mail is shite, but 1 million people read it each day. The Sun is even shiter, but 2 million read it every day. Come back when that sinks in
You're contradicting yourself by claiming only 3 million readers are the voting public and you're wrong if you think facts mean nothing. It means little to the daily mail and sun lot, but real stats still have meaning for millions of others. Not everyone is blinded by paid media. You're an example.
So for the hard of thinking - that’s you btw. My papers comment were an example of what the electorate do. But in case you can’t see that, here are the data on elections since way back. My point.
Thank you for providing context. Fuck you for the insult.
I actually think you're agreeing with me, even if you don't immediately see that. I'm *saying* the fact people get their opinions from frenzied, tribalist, billionaire-owned media (social & legacy) is a core pillar problem. They either fix that or fail.
In policy terms they are doing what they believe is correct. I agree with the approach that they do not respond to reform’s agenda. Philipson today talking about education is 100% right at the start of academic year not Brexit boats and Nige’s yesterday’s ramblings.
The worst thing about labour is they're not labour. Sitting very comfortably next to Tories they've also strengthened Reform. Labour has thrown overboard Labour values. Where are their strengths? What are their values? Who are they? I genuinely want to know. Is this it Labour? It's NOT working...
The direction of travel is clear now. Everyone who subsequently votes Labour will have played their part in delivering a Farage government.
It’s been a year champ.
We are on a downward trajectory, the Far Right gain traction, column inches and support by the day, as Blue Labour pander to them and legitimise their talking points. There are only 3 avenues: Monsterous Growth (lol), Regulating the Press, Continue Plummet/ousting. Take your pick.
Get a grip you idiot. 4 yrs to go. Clown.
But not before he's done irreversible damage.
He’ll be ousted, and the rump of the Labour Party will blame the infighting for their loss, doubling down on the underlying strategy of being nasty, then wonder why they’re staying in oblivion, pretty much a mirror of the Tories current plight.
And you want all of that achieved in a less than a year?
Their polling is abysmal, *his* polling is abysmal, he appears wedded to Morgan Mcsweeny, whose strategy continues to plunge them to new depths. The absence of a McSweeny-exit leaves the blame moving upward. It becomes a question of judgement.
A McSwexit
So it is inevitable that at some point in the next year or so, a coup or group of rebels will coalesce around his stumbling.
"Isnt it better we switch-out with a fair chunk of time to let the new leader settle in, ready for the GE?", i suspect will be the question the labour party ask themselves.
If Andy Burnham runs in a by-election. His out. Otherwise it's Angela Rayner for leadership asap. The sooner the better. Plus hire some teenagers to do there social media.
And? Everyone slated as a possible to replace Starmer is just as bad, or worse, and will carry on in the same vein. Labour needs root and branch reform, not a bit of light deadheading.
Step 1. Get rid of 'Blue Labour'. Anyone in that group is a Tory and has no place in a left wing party.
Agreed Starmer isn't popular but then what? He resigns tomorrow, who is the next leader? They'll still get hammered by the rightwing media and by the left as Red Tories I think we are looking at Trump style Farage government regardless
This is why Press-Reg and Social Media reg is essential. Labour either see that or they do not. Currently they're operating in a "Windows Vista autopilot is flying this 747" kinda capacity.
I believe you are spot on with this- such missed opportunities.
And he os still going on about migrants, just lending credibility to it as a major issue. Which it IS NOT.
And for God's sake, stop supporting bloody genocide!
He spent 4 years lying before becoming PM. Why anyone thought he was the answer to anything is beyond me.
Ousted, to let Farage take his place?? Good luck with that.
The biggest disappointment in British politics in modern history. And given the competition, that is quite the achievement.
He should be ousted, he’s killing @teamlabouruk.bsky.social & anything decent it ever stood (past tense 😬) for! Going on about 🛶, “illegal migrants” (there are none) like some farage boot boy, is embarrassing when citizens are being pillaged by #brexit consequences & being 3rd class Europeans 🙈
With the largest majority in the hallowed chamber since politicians wore extravagant powdered wigs, duelled in Hyde Park & rogered their servant maids. Breathtaking incompetence.
Under what mechanism will be be ousted? He either has to call an election himself which would be bizarre, or challenged for leadership of his party, which doesn't seem to be on the horizon.
This government inherited an absolute nightmare, nothing was working no money to make it work , actually think Jesus Christ would have said " fuck this " If he had to sort out the mess of 14yrs of self servicing hypocritical incompetence that the Tories left behind.
Yeah he had one shot, it wasn’t anything to do with the EU, in fact it’s easier from outside the EU. It was public ownership and a just transition.
And so he should. Now would be a good time.
Keir is a huge fucking dissapoinment. 🤦🏿
Who by? Replaced by who?
Me.
None of the things you listed were in the Labour manifesto that they were voted in on. What a silly post.
"No tax rises on working people" is in the manifesto. I'd playfully speculate said manifesto may not be a particularly credible document come next month.
What tax rises for working people have been announced?
Do you think there'll be tax *cuts* in the Autumn statement?
Could you answer my question first please
None (yet) but if you think we will not see tax rises with the debt as it is, bond interest rates as they are and cuts voted down as they were - you are dreaming. The alternative is more cuts and/or a wealth tax, and Labour have ruled that out. So how are you imagining they’ll avoid this?
None, thank you. There a many taxes that do not affect working people that can be reformed, raised or adjusted. Such as CGT, inheritance tax or a new property or land tax.
There’s a room going around that he will leave as prime minister after the next budget. But knowing him, it’s another lie.
I do not believe he will willingly step down. For all his faults, i think he believes he's doing a public-service by begrudgingly staying on as PM, like "I've got us this far, i dont think i trust anyone else to nav us out of this"