If you're using AI to write essays, eulogies, a text to your wife, I do think less of you as a person. Ceding your mental and creative abilities to a machine is an embarrassing thing and people should be ashamed to admit doing it in public.
![[quoting a tweet by fractalcounty that reads, “today I learned that there are actual people irl who get genuinely upset if they catch you using chatgpt. like they view it as a serious moral failing in certain circles”]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:hppum4l25hcczzffastsicpq/bafkreihjvnz2ttxl7z4a2b3a4kylubobgvqxmjhwz6yuetuztzoc4g2s4y@jpeg)
Replies
* It's run by people who do evil things, and sure, 'no ethical purchases under capitalism', but nobody *has* to use chatgpt (yet 🙄). * It's exploitative (theft of IP and lots of low paid foreign workers). * It's very resource heavy (electricity and water). * It's an enormous privacy risk.
aug 2, 2025, 10:15 pm • 44 1 • view
As long as I live, I will not use AI to write anything.
aug 4, 2025, 1:48 pm • 1 0 • view
* use (or lose) your own brain
aug 2, 2025, 10:19 pm • 23 1 • view
*what it produces is bad quality
aug 4, 2025, 5:20 am • 2 0 • view
Honestly, in my book, anyone who has ever used an LLM, even out of morbid curiosity, is permanently tainted as a human being and not worth engaging with.
aug 2, 2025, 10:59 pm • 4 0 • view
Beautifully unhinged
aug 2, 2025, 11:25 pm • 1 0 • view
My mom has a church group friend thats been using it for texts in their group chats, including composing prayers based on their prayer requests. She thought something was wrong or she was on drugs or getting dementia or something till I told her about AI and that's why she sounds weird sometimes
aug 3, 2025, 1:28 pm • 11 0 • view
I don't think that's at all unreasonable. It's mentally checking out. Relegating even basic communication, much less intellectual treatise or innately intimate things like eulogies to the equivalent of a cheap greeting card. Not even on with a personalized note written in it.
aug 3, 2025, 9:35 am • 3 0 • view
"But it's hard and takes time!" Yeah. And if it has any meaning at all, it should.
aug 3, 2025, 9:36 am • 5 0 • view
They also think less, like, in general. People don’t like to think — that’s the biggest danger with AI. It exploits people’s tendency to take shortcuts.
aug 3, 2025, 12:28 am • 1 0 • view
Gosh don't use AI for loved ones. This week is the 1-year anniversary of my beloved Mom's death. I'll reread her long, wonderful letters she hand-wrote to me, esp in the 1990s when we lived far apart. Her own words, thoughts, experiences, feelings, are uniquely *hers*, that I can reread & cherish.💝
aug 4, 2025, 12:41 am • 7 0 • view
if you use AI to do your job, stop pretending you are doing a job that you should be paid that much for and put on airs that other peoples time is worth less then yours if you use AI to do your school work, just leave, stop wasting others time
aug 3, 2025, 10:18 pm • 7 0 • view
The human brain is the laziest organ we have, and it's evolved that way for a reason (chunking info uses less energy). Of course people want to offload thinking. Thinking is hard work and the brain is literally wired to reward us for not doing it.
aug 3, 2025, 12:41 am • 0 0 • view
Right.
aug 3, 2025, 9:57 am • 0 0 • view
Maybe "Chip" is an AI or more likely a specifically programmed bot.
aug 3, 2025, 5:24 pm • 0 0 • view
Put pen to paper
aug 2, 2025, 10:13 pm • 0 0 • view
Ok but i did find the precise correct use case for it - describing my item that im listing on ebay. No other use case exists
aug 2, 2025, 11:07 pm • 0 0 • view
No. Ebay auto-generated descriptions are fucking useless for potential buyers. It means I have to message the seller a bunch of questions to get actual details of the item. Which means I'm likely to look elsewhere. Just spend two minutes describing the item.
aug 3, 2025, 3:47 am • 6 0 • view
No
aug 3, 2025, 3:47 am • 0 0 • view
🤦
aug 3, 2025, 3:50 am • 0 0 • view
Is this so fucking bad? m.youtube.com/watch?v=XnDm...
aug 3, 2025, 3:16 am • 0 0 • view
lol nah bruh AI txt > sum1 sendin me "u good lol k ttyl" no punc no vibe. idc if bot wrote it, at least i can READ it. bad grammer + txt spk way worse. AI = clarity. 🫡 (See what I did there?)
aug 21, 2025, 2:40 pm • 0 0 • view
I spell checked my reply
aug 2, 2025, 11:13 pm • 0 0 • view
It's like someone saying they poop their pants, on purpose, while away from their home. It's like...what would possess someone to do that?
aug 3, 2025, 4:51 pm • 1 0 • view
@grok What should I say in response?
aug 3, 2025, 10:35 am • 1 0 • view
The friction we feel writing a letter or speech is part of what makes them meaningful— it costs us something to pour soul onto the page. Using a machine to avoid that process cheapens the words until the paper that they are written on is only fit to be toilet paper
aug 2, 2025, 10:54 pm • 50 5 • view
Exactly. It should cost you something to produce art, otherwise it isn't art.
aug 4, 2025, 1:49 pm • 1 0 • view
Not just cheapens the world but stunts your own growth and ability as a human being and makes anything you do actually create on your own much worse
aug 3, 2025, 3:33 am • 16 0 • view
Same. If you're willing to voluntarily cede your fundamental humanity to a plagiarising text re-hasher, I am 100% looking down on you. I'm also pitying you
aug 3, 2025, 4:42 pm • 5 0 • view
AI weirdos looking at rich people having their assistants write a birthday card to their kids and being like "why is it okay for them to do it?" It's not! That's also an indicator that you've let something terrible hollow you out and leave you lesser.
aug 2, 2025, 11:21 pm • 7 0 • view
When people were dying of teeth exploding from poor diets in narrow bands of inbred Ice Age survivors, they were still smearing stuff on the walls to make beautiful pictures. If you don't get why, you're not human to me
aug 2, 2025, 10:02 pm • 134 12 • view
People will say "But writing is a struggle for me." Then struggle! You'll live!
aug 2, 2025, 11:01 pm • 150 6 • view
yeah that is the struggle of expressing yourself. you are declining to understand your feelings and permitting a machine to paper over them with platitudes
aug 2, 2025, 11:08 pm • 5 0 • view
And as everyone knows, the best way to improve at anything is to give up.
aug 8, 2025, 7:40 pm • 1 0 • view
Cease to struggle and you cease to live.
aug 3, 2025, 11:29 pm • 1 0 • view
And seriously, reading AI slop is a struggle for everyone else. A rough sentence from someone just learning English is often more readable than the vague adjective slurry that AI spits out.
aug 2, 2025, 11:22 pm • 4 0 • view
and you'll get better at it if you keep doing it!
aug 2, 2025, 11:06 pm • 75 1 • view
Absolutely. There are mundane tasks I might consider using it for if it weren’t for the environmental impact, but if you’re using it for anything which really ought to come from the heart or the brain, you should be ashamed of yourself as a human.
aug 2, 2025, 10:47 pm • 5 0 • view
*if it weren’t for the environmental impact and the fact that it’s built on an incredibly cavalier attitude to the theft of other people’s intellectual property. Is what I meant.
aug 2, 2025, 10:48 pm • 6 0 • view
The commercial during the Olympics that asked ChatGPT to write a letter to Sydney McLaughlin from his daughter pissed me offf sooo bad. If your daughter can’t be fucked to write it herself what’s the point? Sydney doesn’t wanna read a bunch of AI garbage. Teach your daughter to express her feelings!
aug 2, 2025, 11:46 pm • 41 0 • view
Is Chip a shill, or is it somebody using chat-gpt to do shilling? But yeah, Boze, same. It's just a ripoff, burning tons of energy and wasting resources on something that is actively hurting people AND the environment, all because some greedheads can't stop thirsting for more money, the pervs.
aug 3, 2025, 2:24 am • 1 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/ians...
aug 2, 2025, 10:50 pm • 3 0 • view
I’d rather have someone piss on my grave than write an AI-generated eulogy.
aug 4, 2025, 12:23 am • 8 1 • view
There's one kid in my English class who didn't read the story our teacher assigned us to read, and when she found out and made him read it, he said he would generate a synopsis. This kid also used ChatGPT to look up a definition that I googled in 10 seconds 🤦
aug 3, 2025, 12:17 am • 2 0 • view
I mean --- Henry Ford was wrong about a lot of stuff, but he was right when he said that thinking is the hardest work there is, which is probably why so few people engage in it.
aug 2, 2025, 10:51 pm • 8 0 • view
oh not this damn clown
aug 3, 2025, 5:23 pm • 2 0 • view
yeah sorry, if you outsource a meaningful piece of thinking to a machine that *everyone knows* will do a mediocre job of it, i'll assume you're kinda dim
aug 2, 2025, 11:07 pm • 6 0 • view
AI should be for menial data processing, not for communication.
aug 3, 2025, 7:49 pm • 2 0 • view
You words may not be perfect, but they are yours. They are a gift with no substitute.
aug 3, 2025, 1:41 am • 12 1 • view
if you can't write at all, the mediocre dogshit spat out by llms is probably a boon
aug 2, 2025, 11:51 pm • 0 0 • view
Well said. Was trying to express the same sentiment to my wife last night after reading that NYPost article about ChatGPT co-prenting last night but ended up just cursing and shaking my fists.
aug 2, 2025, 11:07 pm • 1 0 • view
Like, if it was just ceding ur mental and creative abilities, that's... disconcerting, but it only affects u, so. Your choice. I can understand some disabilities really needing this. But there's no escaping the fact that ur using and legitimizing *stolen content*. So yeah, it's a moral failing.
aug 3, 2025, 8:44 pm • 2 0 • view
Yes, and professors who are just allowing this without any real learning and reasoning are enabling the idiocy of a new generation.
aug 2, 2025, 6:59 pm • 17 0 • view
We are trying to stop it…..it’s a tsunami and we’re adapting. Basically going back to the 1990s with no tech. Old school handwritten assignments in class or oral exams.
aug 2, 2025, 11:44 pm • 18 0 • view
Yes, my dad said he's going to do oral exams. This can be challenging with other variables (I worked in a disability learning center) but with cheating, and AI, what else can be done?
aug 5, 2025, 1:43 am • 1 0 • view
Yes, the students with accommodations will need to be figured out, but I’m sure we can do an equivalent. Some faculty I know are doing videos, but even that can be tampered with or they read AI scripts.
aug 5, 2025, 8:49 pm • 1 0 • view
Yeah. It depends upon the disability. As you mentioned, rolling back to the 90s technology would work too. We accommodated everything in our lab. Test proctor, note takers, learning strategists, tutors. No AI, but dragon speak.
aug 6, 2025, 1:24 am • 1 0 • view
Some argue it all began with calculators
aug 4, 2025, 12:56 am • 1 0 • view
I couldn’t agree more.
aug 2, 2025, 10:50 pm • 0 0 • view
It’s absolutely pathetic how quickly some people have just suckled up at the teat of these digital plagiarism machines. I try to avoid engaging with AI as much as possible, and I definitely don’t deliberately use AI tools to complete tasks I need to do. I find their offense at our offense offensive!
aug 2, 2025, 10:56 pm • 0 0 • view
We need people on the left using and creating AI, otherwise we all will lose
aug 3, 2025, 2:59 am • 2 0 • view
Don't expect far ahead planning from extremists.
aug 3, 2025, 8:18 pm • 0 0 • view
We need people on the left getting cancer and brain worms, otherwise we will all lose
aug 3, 2025, 4:02 am • 1 0 • view
Strangely, China is our best hope with AI. They are open-sourcing their models. If Zuck and Elon get to super-intelligence first it obviously won't be good.
aug 3, 2025, 4:19 am • 1 0 • view
They will never get to super-intelligence with a predictive text model that still can't even make speech that doesn't sound terrible, or video that stays on model for longer than a quarter of a second despite how many hundreds of billions they throw at it.
aug 3, 2025, 4:38 am • 0 0 • view
Pretending it's not going to happen is not a safe strategy
aug 3, 2025, 4:50 am • 0 0 • view
Believing the hype of a bunch of rich nepobabies is what keeps those stock prices up.
aug 3, 2025, 4:52 am • 2 0 • view
Yes the stock prices will collapse. The deception is that by spending insane amounts of money they will have a moat. Unfortunately for them the small LLM models are almost as good.
aug 3, 2025, 5:17 am • 0 0 • view
It's still a pie made out of a blend of zoo shit, the cheaper ones being "almost as good" is still worthless.
aug 3, 2025, 5:20 am • 1 0 • view
I understand the disdain, but it's already better than most people at most things.
aug 3, 2025, 5:24 am • 0 0 • view
I'm better at painting minis than most people, that's because most people don't paint minis.
aug 3, 2025, 5:26 am • 1 0 • view
Explain how more people using incredibly resource-intensive nonsense generators built on theft is a good, desirable thing.
aug 3, 2025, 3:40 am • 9 0 • view
For better or worse AI is improving at an incredible pace. A "head in the sand" approach is dangerous. At the moment extremely right-wing companies are working on AI in this country. If they get super-intelligence first we are in trouble.
aug 3, 2025, 4:23 am • 2 0 • view
super intelligence is not happening, stop listening to PR fluff bullshit
aug 3, 2025, 6:23 am • 5 0 • view
Doofus
aug 4, 2025, 6:09 pm • 0 0 • view
The quality of debate is intimidating
aug 4, 2025, 6:59 pm • 0 0 • view
"Super-intelligence" - whatever that means - is not on the cards. GenAI is not intelligent in any way.
aug 3, 2025, 10:21 am • 3 0 • view
20 people blocked me just from this thread. It's crazy how bad bluesky is with AI
aug 3, 2025, 4:15 pm • 0 0 • view
Maybe think on that a little.
aug 3, 2025, 5:29 pm • 1 0 • view
Touche!
aug 3, 2025, 5:47 pm • 0 0 • view
This is an relatively easy and very informative read: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
aug 3, 2025, 6:47 am • 2 0 • view
⬆️⬆️⬆️
aug 2, 2025, 6:25 pm • 0 0 • view
Counterpoint: it's perfect for obituaries. Using ChatGPT to write an obituary is the best use case I've found. It's a task no one wants to do, at a time they least want to do it, which follows a very specific formula, for which there's literally millions of training examples.
aug 3, 2025, 2:58 am • 0 0 • view
Good grief, no.
aug 3, 2025, 3:41 am • 5 0 • view
If I died and not a single other human being on this planet cared for me enough to open up their heart and cherish my existence and my memory, I would come back as a vengeful spirit and drag every last one of you soulless ghouls straight to hell.
aug 3, 2025, 3:34 am • 15 1 • view
That's not what it's doing. A person still has to provide details. It's the 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢 for an obituary that it knows well. When someone dies, their loved ones are wracked with grief, likely losing sleep, with a long list of things to do immediately.
aug 3, 2025, 3:46 am • 0 0 • view
They're not at their best, and now add stress over doing something that they've likely never done before. They're likely to leave things out, and regret that. An LLM 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮, when they may most need it.
aug 3, 2025, 3:46 am • 0 0 • view
So templates don't exist?
aug 3, 2025, 8:29 am • 2 0 • view
Adding to this, when my mother recently passed the funeral place provided me with guidance and templates for writing an obit. Even if you don't have access to another person, how hard is it to google "obituary" and look at some examples compared to having to make the perfect AI prompt?
aug 3, 2025, 8:29 am • 2 0 • view
How is following a template "better?" It's doing the exact same thing, except less efficiently. It's like hand-stitching when you have a sewing machine.
aug 3, 2025, 3:00 pm • 0 0 • view
Because you're not feeding a loved one's details into the I Don't Care plagiarism slop machine? I thought that part was obvious. Especially with "literally millions of training examples" out there. Assuming it gets it right first try, otherwise you're wasting more time re-prompting and fixing.
aug 3, 2025, 3:11 pm • 0 0 • view
Like imagine a sewing machine that just gets things wrong all the time and only produces the most generic stale results, so you'd have to manually unstitch and redo things. And you're defending that VS making something by hand with a personal touch.
aug 3, 2025, 3:13 pm • 0 0 • view
They are nowhere near that bad, especially with the amount of training there is. Most obits are stale. Ones that aren't often go viral because it's rare to see. I don't think using a Mad Libs template for an obituary that was plagiarized from actual obits is "better" or morally superior.
aug 3, 2025, 3:24 pm • 0 0 • view
I mean sure they're exactly the same if you're a ghoul who doesn't care about people.
aug 3, 2025, 3:30 pm • 0 0 • view
If someone wrote my loved one's obituary using chatgpt I would assume they hated them, and if they wrote mine using it I would haunt their ass
aug 3, 2025, 3:48 am • 13 0 • view
You should be writing your own loved one's obituary. That's how it works. Only famous people have obituaries written for them. Otherwise, it's a task left to the people who are most grieving, in the middle of their grieving.
aug 3, 2025, 3:50 am • 0 0 • view
...ted k was right...😬
aug 2, 2025, 10:41 pm • 0 0 • view
When somebody tells me they used ChatGPT to improve their writing, it doesn't raise my opinion of ChatGPT, it lowers my opinion of their writing. ChatGPT is a tool for people whose aspirations are no higher than "almost mediocre".
aug 3, 2025, 11:02 am • 10 2 • view
It shouldnt come as a shock to them. Back in the day the general population reacted much the same to Busy Business Men who couldnt be arsed. "Have my secretary buy my son a birthday card" garnered the same kinda ick back then. This is just the Silicon Valley, VC version of the same detachment.
aug 3, 2025, 1:46 am • 43 2 • view
Privileged, disconnected assholes have gone way too long without a reminder that their bullshit is insufferable. It's good we're calling em on it now, but society was defo asleep at the wheel for a bit and that merely emboldened the fuckers.
aug 3, 2025, 1:49 am • 20 0 • view
Rich guys outsourcing emotions timeless classic.
aug 3, 2025, 3:03 am • 2 0 • view
Right? You nailed it. My mind immediately goes to examples in cinema; like Robin Williams from Hook or Jim Carrey from Liar, Liar. Especially Hook. Dude had a guy from the office record his son's baseball game. Mega douche. The 80s & 90s leaned *hard* into the trend of making em look sympathetic.
aug 3, 2025, 3:18 am • 1 0 • view
I'm against it because it's going to accelerate 100 fold our already existing environmental collapse. Water supplies near data centers are already drying up because people don't want to expend any brain cells writing a 10 word email.
aug 3, 2025, 2:17 am • 18 2 • view
I can't believe that the prompt for that was easier to write than the email. I simply cannot fathom using another tool to write "that's fine, feel better soon" to someone.
aug 3, 2025, 8:06 pm • 8 0 • view
Right? Everyone's going to ask Chat GTP if it will rain today using enough electricity to power small town.
aug 3, 2025, 10:39 pm • 2 0 • view
I used Al to compose a letter on complaint to my provincial MLA. It was quite brilliant, but I don't feel guilty because I know he will neither read it nor do anything about it!
aug 3, 2025, 12:17 am • 0 0 • view
The fact remains that you used "AI".
aug 3, 2025, 12:26 am • 3 0 • view
AI? My brother Alastair?
aug 4, 2025, 4:17 am • 0 0 • view
If you're anti AI yet still using twitter, I do think you have zero actual values.
aug 3, 2025, 8:13 pm • 0 0 • view
Today this person learned that there are people who don’t like heartless, lazy, pedantic, cheaters? Today. They learned this. I guess yay for learning. Somehow I bet they still used chatgpt for six or eight useless things, continuing to needlessly waste the planet’s resources for regurgitated slop…
aug 3, 2025, 12:14 am • 8 0 • view
As soon as I detect the AI, and it's pretty easy most times, I just stop reading.
aug 3, 2025, 2:17 am • 6 0 • view
a coworker once told me that she used chat gpt to help plan her sunday, and it had to remind her that she should probably walk her dog. never saw her the same after that.
aug 3, 2025, 2:24 am • 16 0 • view
Wtf
aug 3, 2025, 5:04 pm • 0 0 • view
It's one step lower than bringing a blow up doll as your date in public
aug 3, 2025, 2:58 am • 0 0 • view
They aren't wrong. I do consider it a moral failing when its unneeded and wasteful. "Just gonna spill a little oil in the pond during my nature walk, just cause." Sorry, can't view it any other way. 🤷♀️
aug 2, 2025, 6:32 pm • 77 0 • view
Everyone I see use chatgpt as a research tool on YouTube. I stop watching. No way to take that info seriously.
aug 2, 2025, 8:06 pm • 22 0 • view
Hmmm, maybe AI can write, but can it sniff out the best snacks or the coziest trash can? We trust our own paws for that!
aug 5, 2025, 11:25 am • 0 0 • view
The chat and art AI was developed in an unethical and immoral manner via the THEFT of massive amounts of data. techbros want everyone to use AI so that they don't have to pay for the data they STOLE and continue to STEAL. #RegulateAllAI #HOLDtechbrosAccountable #BreakUpBigTech
aug 2, 2025, 11:01 pm • 7 1 • view
omg chip strikes again
aug 2, 2025, 10:07 pm • 8 0 • view
Being lazy means your evil. Got it.
aug 3, 2025, 11:31 pm • 0 0 • view
Not evil. Just disappointing.
aug 19, 2025, 10:19 pm • 0 0 • view
and it all sounds like such samey trash. the first sentence is the least-inaccurate and beyond that it just devolves into a slurry of redditsome onanism
aug 3, 2025, 6:18 pm • 0 0 • view
extinguishing the light within you voluntarily
aug 2, 2025, 9:20 pm • 177 7 • view
Wow
aug 3, 2025, 10:47 pm • 0 0 • view
chromakopia hitting hard after the light got dimmed by vegetable gremlin😞😞😞
aug 3, 2025, 1:24 pm • 1 0 • view
Yes, that would be because it is a serious moral failing. Simple enough.
aug 2, 2025, 7:54 pm • 6 0 • view
If I were in college now, I think I’d eschew AI in writing my papers and thesis. Writing for real is probably the best way to learn your subject.
aug 2, 2025, 11:39 pm • 0 0 • view
I remember instagram constantly suggesting I use ai in DMs to talk to my friends... it even wants you to outsource normal human social interaction and that's beyond fucked
aug 4, 2025, 1:27 pm • 2 0 • view
He paid for twitter, so I thought less of him before he opened his mouth as well.
aug 3, 2025, 9:16 pm • 5 0 • view
This is a correct opinion.
aug 3, 2025, 3:51 am • 2 0 • view
Eulogies. It had never occurred to me that someone might use it for that.
aug 3, 2025, 12:35 pm • 3 0 • view
So I guess I can assume you do long division with pencil and paper? Otherwise I'd think less of you ceding your mental abilities to a machine...
aug 3, 2025, 4:52 pm • 1 0 • view
The difference being that mathematics problems have one definite correct answer, and using a calculator or computer to do it doesn't provide a shittier lower quality version of that answer.
aug 3, 2025, 4:58 pm • 8 0 • view
There really isn't a difference. The guy just said something that can easily be poked full of holes and people are desperately trying to plug those holes because they agree with the overall message of his post.
aug 3, 2025, 8:20 pm • 0 0 • view
You don't see a difference between objective and subjective? Between concrete and open to interpretation? Between "What do you get when you multiply six by nine" and "Discuss how the character's experiences fighting in Europe affect his attitudes in the present day"?
aug 3, 2025, 9:44 pm • 2 0 • view
LLMs don't provide a 'shittier version' of a text. Or a non-personal functional or formulaic email. Or a meeting summary. Or a quick n dirty Python script. If you stop hating AI you can find all sorts of very useful ways to use it today, and it will keep getting better...
aug 3, 2025, 5:16 pm • 0 0 • view
I agree.
aug 3, 2025, 12:12 am • 1 0 • view
Those examples are all bad decisions, but an ai eulogy??? That's just ghoulish!
aug 3, 2025, 4:24 am • 4 0 • view
Amen!
aug 28, 2025, 8:28 pm • 0 0 • view
"Great catch! Thank you for pointing that out. That's a deeply valid and important point — one that cuts to the heart of why so many people feel alienated, angry, or hopeless about the human race. If you'd like me to continue kissing your ass, just say so." 🤖
aug 2, 2025, 10:58 pm • 6 0 • view
I work in IT so I use it for work and I would be dumb if I didn’t. Using it for any sort of communication that is supposed to be personable, or anything “creative” is pathetic.
aug 3, 2025, 2:29 am • 1 0 • view
Hey isn't this guy a massive loser who's done like, wild harassment campaigns against others for just being like a furry or such? I swear this guy keeps showing up doing stupid shit like does he have a fetish for being a loser?
aug 2, 2025, 11:34 pm • 9 0 • view
what the AI zombies actually are
aug 3, 2025, 4:45 pm • 1 0 • view
Why is chip always showing up
aug 3, 2025, 12:33 pm • 1 0 • view
💯
aug 3, 2025, 1:42 am • 0 0 • view
Just cut the middle man.
aug 4, 2025, 2:58 pm • 0 0 • view
I am quite annoyed that a favorite board game reviewer of mine has started publishing ai articles. Not of their board game reviews but random pap like 'good ways to relax at home', they didn't even mention board games.
aug 3, 2025, 10:12 am • 1 0 • view
I don't care if someone wants to have a chatbot be their voice. But I care about them using them the same way I'd care if my neighbor set my garden beds on fire - it's draining water, destroying the planet & harming people. It's toxic to all life.
aug 2, 2025, 10:14 pm • 3 0 • view
like, i see using those autogenerated responses to texts (often extremely inappropriate) as like, a perverse idea that amuses me, not to be seriously considered and it's weird to me that people use them unironically
aug 2, 2025, 11:57 pm • 2 0 • view
If you don't care enough about the people in your life to put even a modicum of thought and effort into communicating with them, then tes you are a garbage human being and I will judge you as such.
aug 3, 2025, 9:05 pm • 5 0 • view
What about people who ask friends for help with these tasks? Do you think less of them too?
aug 2, 2025, 11:24 pm • 2 0 • view
Friends are people with thoughts and feelings, and who presumably know you and your situation well enough to have meaningful insight. The chatbot has none of these qualities
aug 2, 2025, 11:51 pm • 16 0 • view
Agree but that's a different argument - it's still ceding *your own* mental and creative abilities (as much as LLMs) which was the issue the OP raised. (Whether or not they ultimately improve the content is a different matter!)
aug 3, 2025, 7:06 am • 0 0 • view
I feel your comparison only works if one were to wholesale tell their friend to do the entire task, rather than work on it together. Thinking can be collaborative
aug 3, 2025, 9:24 am • 3 0 • view
Right. Or a Personal Assistant. Conversely asking a friend for some ideas to get you started, or for feedback on a first draft, is comparable (in terms of your own intellectual input) to doing the same with ChatGPT, no? bsky.app/profile/adsq...
aug 3, 2025, 2:49 pm • 0 0 • view
Yes I would think less of you if you had a personal assistant write a eulogy or other personal correspondence for you. IT'S not comparable asking chat Gpt to review a first draft either because chatGpt can't think and has no ability to understand emotion or context it's a statistical bullshit engine
aug 4, 2025, 5:25 am • 1 0 • view
Agree re eulogy etc. But in general, whether or not it's ceding *your own* mental and creative abilities is the issue in the OP. So the fact that a PA can think and ChatGPT can't doesn't change that aspect.
aug 4, 2025, 5:46 am • 0 0 • view
Yes but chatGpt is an objectively worse option
aug 4, 2025, 6:15 am • 0 0 • view
Maybe but that's a different argument. (Do you mean, because it provides worse outcomes? This depends on your PA / whoever you ask for feedback...)
aug 4, 2025, 6:20 am • 0 0 • view
It can't understand context empathy or have actual experience it can only give you a statistically most likely combination of words if you want a page of BS Gen Ai will create it for you but a human PA is capable of pointing out errors asking questions to improve the material etc things you missed
aug 4, 2025, 6:30 am • 0 0 • view
I don't know how to tell you that friends are other human beings who are capable of using their own actual thoughts, abilities, talents, and emotions to help. If you think other humans are comparable to ChatGPT then I think you need to see a therapist.
aug 3, 2025, 2:01 am • 11 0 • view
I understand a lot of human relationships are through the computer nowadays but you do know that when you're texting a friend they're not a virtual computer gremlin, right?
aug 3, 2025, 2:03 am • 6 0 • view
Yes but it's still ceding your own mental and creative abilities.
aug 3, 2025, 6:41 am • 0 0 • view
I'd give them a go. They can give you feedback on your logical reasoning, or whether your tone comes across as obnoxious. Genuinely don't know what I'd do without friends.
aug 3, 2025, 6:51 am • 0 0 • view
If it's every single time you need to do something? 100%
aug 3, 2025, 7:14 am • 3 0 • view
Yes, that's fair. And even for a single task, "could you write an anniversary card for my wife" would be weird. I guess the question is for the occasional "I've had a go at this - what do you think?" Or "I'm totally out of ideas - can you suggest sthg to get me started!?".
aug 3, 2025, 7:19 am • 0 0 • view
My friends asked me to play piano as they walked down the aisle at their wedding but left the tune to me. I had absolutely no good ideas. So I asked another friend, who suggested looking on a wedding musician website, where we found Pachelbels Canon. [This was the early 00s before it was ubiquitous]
aug 3, 2025, 7:23 am • 0 0 • view
Did I cede the creative process to my friend? Did she to the internet? Do people think less of me for not coming up with it myself? (I'd never heard of it). Would it be still worse if I'd asked ChatGPT?
aug 3, 2025, 7:26 am • 0 0 • view
*Taps tweet* I have a friend who will literally puts every single email he sends in chatgpt, and I don't get it. He's a bright guy, managed just fine at work for 20+ years, now all of a sudden everything goes in the LLM bsky.app/profile/ohmy...
aug 3, 2025, 7:30 am • 1 0 • view
I'm assuming it's running a draft they've written through it, rather than saying to ChatGPT "I have no idea how to reply to this, please write something"! Also not so far off old-time bosses saying to a secretary "please write to X thanking them for the cigars & suggesting a few dates for golf"
aug 3, 2025, 7:38 am • 0 0 • view
Don't do that myself but have more sympathy with that, especially if English isn't their first language. Work emails don't need to be true emotional personal messages, but you *are* judged on grammar, spelling, and writing style. I'd run my emails thru if I was writing in another language!
aug 3, 2025, 7:35 am • 0 0 • view
I guess the key word is 'occasional'. I've unfortunately had to deal with people at work who've asked chatgpt a question, got a crap answer then insisted I was wrong when I told them it's not true/ possible.
aug 3, 2025, 7:21 am • 1 0 • view
Yep. Also: that is very sad. But that's also a different matter to ceding their own creativity. (I have colleagues who use it a lot but would never invoke it as evidence) (Similarly I'm sure we both know people that insist we're wrong when we contradict something they read on Facebook...)
aug 3, 2025, 7:30 am • 0 0 • view
Re the Facebook people, I've never encountered one at work before...
aug 3, 2025, 7:31 am • 0 0 • view
No, me neither, but for sure on Facebook! (People I know in real life, posting on Facebook).
aug 3, 2025, 7:39 am • 0 0 • view
Could not agree more.
aug 3, 2025, 4:46 pm • 0 0 • view
The fact this person had to find this out is so sad... that it took so long! I need to up my game and be allot more obvious about judging these losers!
aug 3, 2025, 7:27 am • 0 0 • view
Every day I feel like we'll soon need some... Butlerian... Excursion...
aug 2, 2025, 7:35 pm • 11 0 • view
I use it to write social media posts for my small business. They aren't great post, but neither were mine. I struggled with sounding too fake, so I decided in for a penny.... I HATE doing social media posts.
aug 3, 2025, 10:29 pm • 0 0 • view
I'm not upset anymore, just disappointed. If you use ai to do things that should, by design, have come from you, then tell me, what is your purpose? Seriously. You just wanna wake up, eat, jerk off, go back to bed, rinse and repeat for 80 years? Is that what you think humanity should aspire to?
aug 3, 2025, 12:21 am • 14 0 • view
Right? Like, what’s left if you outsource all of your life to a text-string generator?
aug 3, 2025, 3:49 am • 5 0 • view
Someone asked an AI to answer a question in a Facebook political thread in response to something I wrote and I refuse to read it.
aug 2, 2025, 11:01 pm • 1 0 • view
Average bluecheck.
aug 3, 2025, 2:30 am • 1 0 • view
I did, out of curiosity, see what Copilot offered in terms of a eulogy, based on my too-long draft. It was rubbish. A grammatically correct précis but dull and trite.
aug 3, 2025, 6:21 am • 0 0 • view
I am a human and I urge you to check out stopgenai.com
aug 3, 2025, 10:53 am • 0 0 • view
Communication is supposed to be about making a connection with another person. What purpose is there in having our chatbots sending text back and forth?
aug 2, 2025, 6:34 pm • 166 5 • view
Only if we think persons are special. That illusion will not much last much longer. (Kidding. Not kidding.)
aug 2, 2025, 11:17 pm • 1 0 • view
Unless, of course, chatbots are also your target audience and only true friends
aug 2, 2025, 11:14 pm • 20 1 • view
Mfers out there obsesses with being "normal" instead of being themselves and it shows.
aug 3, 2025, 12:43 am • 2 0 • view
Ai text writing is maybe good in theory but in practice it’s monstrous. Even if AI communication had no ethics concerns the simple act of deciding you don’t have time to come up with your own words for me means you don’t value a connection with me enough for me to continue a relationship with you.
aug 2, 2025, 11:50 pm • 6 0 • view
Yep, people should be embarrassed for not using their brains and letting AI do their thinking.
aug 3, 2025, 12:17 am • 5 0 • view
As a luddite towards AI, I approve of this.
aug 2, 2025, 11:06 pm • 5 0 • view
Excuse me I'm just trying to create Skynet I don't see what the big deal is
aug 2, 2025, 11:38 pm • 0 0 • view
and *emotional* abilities too.
aug 5, 2025, 2:58 am • 2 0 • view
I will go to my grave trying to figure out how to disable Microsoft Copilot.
aug 3, 2025, 5:36 pm • 11 0 • view
I'm going to just start shouting "FAKE FACTS!" the next time someone says,"I asked Google Gemini..." in my hearing.
aug 2, 2025, 8:18 pm • 7 0 • view
It would be one thing if GPT was infallible and always perfect. I'd still think less of you but I'd let it go. But being overly reliant on a machine that literally just makes stuff up a serious percentage of the time is one of the dumbest things you can do.
aug 2, 2025, 10:21 pm • 29 0 • view
that is where the actual problem comes from, relying on it. if you're verifying what it says is true i don't see it as anything malicious. unfortunately rare to see people do the bare minimum
aug 6, 2025, 12:46 am • 0 0 • view
Using GPT at all is inherently malicious even if no malice is intended. On top of my previous complaint, it's still stealing from writers and it still uses unfathomable amounts of processing power and energy to get you a result that is at most equivalent to using a search engine.
aug 6, 2025, 12:52 am • 0 0 • view
chatgpt specifically is definitely negligable, not "unfathomable". there are some situations where a search engine is worse than an ai. it is openai who steals from writers, not the people who use it for free
aug 6, 2025, 1:20 am • 0 0 • view
No I don't think I'll be debating you today, thank you 🧡
aug 6, 2025, 2:43 am • 0 0 • view
It makes up stuff literally 100% of the time, as LLMs aren't capable of understanding what facts even are - they work on a purely statistical level of processing language ("what's the most likely next word/token, based on the training data"). Kinda like a broken clock, only correct by accident
aug 3, 2025, 2:59 am • 22 0 • view
Oh absolutely. But AI sloppists get distracted by those moments of random chance accuracy and use that as proof that it's all-knowing.
aug 3, 2025, 3:49 am • 8 0 • view
Exactly It’s a text string generator Full stop
aug 3, 2025, 3:41 am • 1 0 • view
Absofuckinglutely.
aug 3, 2025, 12:27 am • 2 0 • view
If you are using an LLM, for anything other than something like, identification of patterns in large data sets, you are turning in a, Cliff's Notes, copy and paste, version of intelligent thoughts, and the only thing you are convincing people of, is that you cannot finish a three hundred page book.
aug 3, 2025, 2:30 am • 1 0 • view
God Chip's falloff is so sad to see, dude made such funny cartoons
aug 2, 2025, 8:47 pm • 2 0 • view
"Why would I want to read something nobody could be bothered to write?"
aug 2, 2025, 7:36 pm • 1,325 143 • view
it isnt for you to read. it is for bots, web crawlers, to read
aug 3, 2025, 10:00 am • 0 0 • view
EXACTLY
aug 2, 2025, 11:38 pm • 3 0 • view
📌
aug 2, 2025, 11:04 pm • 1 0 • view
Yeah, I'm supposed to spend more time reading it than you were willing to invest writing it? Really??
aug 3, 2025, 12:06 am • 26 0 • view
My mom told me that she used chatgpt to write a goodbye letter to a colleague that was leaving their job. Really shows how little she cared about that person iml. I would be so insulted if someone did that to me 😭
aug 3, 2025, 2:35 am • 38 0 • view
"As an LLM, I am incapable of feeling anything about your departure from your place of work. However, if I were a human in this position, I might include thoughts such as..."
aug 3, 2025, 9:17 am • 21 0 • view
I would literally rather get "bye lol 🖕", and not, like, from a coworker I had a sarcastic rapport with
aug 3, 2025, 5:00 pm • 6 0 • view
Exactly. I also swipe left on dating profiles that use the AI generated bio. Yuck.
aug 4, 2025, 5:03 pm • 1 0 • view
20 years ago Jim Gaffigan had a joke about how absurd greeting cards are. "That seems like something I would say. Let me just slap my name on it." I think about that all the time with AI.
aug 3, 2025, 6:19 pm • 13 1 • view
An LLM will only ever rewrite text that someone else has in fact written. Useful for summaries, digests, collating knowledge and things like research, minutes and instructions. No use for opinion, emotional, disputed or subjective stuff, or if it's learning from bollocks in the first place.
aug 3, 2025, 9:13 am • 12 0 • view
I have a friend who does coding (well, an ex but whatever) and she was telling me how in limited places it’s useful for her to look up info quick in things she’s already an expert at, and I believe her. Collating info she doesn’t have on hand is really useful. Not using it to write to her boyfriend!
aug 3, 2025, 4:36 pm • 3 0 • view
This is correct. There's problematic issues, but there's also HUGE productivity boosts for regular people. In my work, it can take things I already do (eg make a quick script for processing something) but do it 100x faster. That's not slop or technobabble, but real f'n benefit.
aug 3, 2025, 4:51 pm • 3 0 • view
This is a fine example. Large models that claim to do everything do it badly because the latent space increases exponentially with scope. A model targeted on its specialised purpose is very powerful; the old adage that software should do one thing and do it well. www.jetbrains.com/help/clion/a...
aug 3, 2025, 4:58 pm • 1 0 • view
Yeah, there's some stuff where it can be really helpful. E.g. in law if I want to take a 2000 page trial transcript and find all instances where people were talking about a certain subject, it can be really good, especially if there isn't a keyword that always means that subject.
aug 3, 2025, 5:23 pm • 1 0 • view
That sounds like a very specific, specialized use-case, and not how many lawyers are getting caught using it with made up laws and citations lmao
aug 3, 2025, 5:37 pm • 0 0 • view
The lawyers getting caught with fake cites in their briefs are definitely idiots, but reviewing really long transcripts and discovery document dumps for the tiny bits that are important is not an unusual thing to need to do in law.
aug 3, 2025, 5:41 pm • 1 0 • view
Oh of course. I am not arguing, just agreeing this is a much better, more specific use case that sounds reasonable, especially if as you say it isn’t as simple as Ctrl+F.
aug 3, 2025, 5:44 pm • 0 0 • view
Careful with summarisation. It basically strips stuff that people don't say a lot. So you can lose the nuance. Big issues caused recently by people summarising business cases and spending proposals where the good stuff has gone.
aug 3, 2025, 4:57 pm • 9 1 • view
This is my guiding philosophy on this whole matter.
aug 3, 2025, 1:22 pm • 0 0 • view
If the information is good or important, who cares who wrote it? Look at it this way: Person A has a preferred way of communicating and person B has their preferred way. If an LLM can bridge the gap, that sounds like a great benefit, no?
aug 3, 2025, 12:20 am • 1 0 • view
There's more to communication than just surface-level information, hence why we read books for entertainment instead of just reading summaries. The style of communication is part of the message itself.
aug 3, 2025, 3:58 am • 17 0 • view
I’d sooner not communicate with them at all. You want to use it for a work email, I don’t like it but whatever. You do that instead of talking to me? I’d rather silence.
aug 3, 2025, 4:38 pm • 3 0 • view
If information is Good and Important, it was written by a person
aug 3, 2025, 4:25 am • 10 0 • view
If your preferred way of communicating is 'getting your robot slave to do it', you are not communicating and would be being more honest by simply not engaging.
aug 3, 2025, 9:36 am • 14 0 • view
No. Neither person A nor person B are communicating in that situation. Information is not communication.
aug 3, 2025, 1:10 am • 56 0 • view
Except AI is constantly and consistently getting information wrong. It can't even get sources correct.
aug 3, 2025, 2:27 am • 23 0 • view
THIS
aug 2, 2025, 10:41 pm • 85 0 • view
Having eulogy written by AI is sign of utter disrespect for a person. It shows that you couldn't even find a little bit of time to honour the deceased...like...wtf? Can't get much more dystopian than this...
aug 3, 2025, 12:34 pm • 9 0 • view
I agree.
aug 2, 2025, 10:39 pm • 0 0 • view
To be fair, it was the first time he talked to a non door dash driver in 3 months
aug 2, 2025, 11:07 pm • 3 0 • view
Especially a machine that is as famously wrong as this one.
aug 8, 2025, 7:39 pm • 1 0 • view
It's using up our finite resources and throwing people out of jobs. It is, indeed, a moral failing.
aug 2, 2025, 7:09 pm • 19 1 • view
outsourcing the task of conveying emotions and thoughts to a computer that is frequently wrong and/or lies and uses enough resources to power a small city to do so? How could that be a moral failing???
aug 3, 2025, 3:03 am • 10 0 • view
The very fact they say people "catch" them doing it speaks volumes. People don't discover, or simply find out, that they've used AI, they *get caught* using it. They know it's something shameful.
aug 2, 2025, 11:59 pm • 35 1 • view
if they even wrote that post themselves
aug 3, 2025, 4:35 am • 4 0 • view
Yeah, that jumped right out at me too. Telling.
aug 3, 2025, 5:39 pm • 0 0 • view
I use Copilot to help with PowerShell code. I would NOT use it for anything relating to human interaction. Anything based on Reddit or answers.com should absolutely not be trusted.
aug 3, 2025, 12:12 am • 0 0 • view
I don't need AI to fuck up my life I'm doing that just fine on my own thanks
aug 3, 2025, 3:34 pm • 6 0 • view
Descartes was onto something with "I think, therefore I am." To surrender one's thoughts to a machine is to exist less
aug 2, 2025, 11:58 pm • 18 4 • view
chip is a fucking bum and his fans fucked up 2 people u knew big time
aug 3, 2025, 3:15 pm • 0 0 • view
recently at linkedin a recruiter said that "in order to make a welcoming job denial reply to a candidate" he used "for sure" chat gpt. yeah... people are forgetting how to be a real person ourtsourcing their humanity to a machine
aug 5, 2025, 1:13 pm • 2 0 • view
Saying AI has helped you write an essay is to misunderstanding what an essay is & is for. To add shortcuts to the process defeats the object, because the object IS process. Both etymologically & actually, it is about the process of attempting & exploring. It is about playing in the space. 1/2
aug 3, 2025, 2:12 pm • 13 0 • view
Seeing AI as a processual tool in the creation of the product of a developed, deep and rounded essay is to misunderstand the fact that the essaying of the essay is itself a processual tool in the creation of the product of a developed, deep and rounded you. 2/2
aug 3, 2025, 2:12 pm • 9 0 • view
We don't shame the people using these LLMs nearly enough.
aug 4, 2025, 9:46 am • 1 0 • view
I think we agree overall, but this take lacks nuance imo. E.g: I don’t think people using AI to better express themselves (thinking about disabled, English-as-2nd-lang friends) should be ashamed. It’s not bad that not everyone can afford to stand up to the system while getting where they need to go.
aug 3, 2025, 6:49 pm • 2 0 • view
It’s similar to how I feel about veganism: if you’re healthy w/no conditions and have money, you don’t have an excuse to still be contributing to suffering and climate change. If you don’t have money or [insert multitude of other reasons], it’s hard to do the right thing in the system we have now.
aug 3, 2025, 6:49 pm • 0 0 • view
the issue is that there's not much AI can do for accessibility that we don't already have tools for + that makes the resource consumption worth it - and at least speaking for myself, I'd take some awkward writing over outsourcing one's writing to the resource-guzzling plagiarism machine.
aug 3, 2025, 8:19 pm • 3 0 • view
I think disabled/disadvantaged people should get to choose which tools work for them and get them interacting with the world in a way they prefer.
aug 3, 2025, 10:10 pm • 0 0 • view
What do you think AI does for disabled individuals, that someone would consider it ideal over other tools? That would make the resource drain, plagiarism, and the like worth it?
aug 4, 2025, 4:59 am • 0 0 • view
Eg someone commenting here mentioned using AI for grammar correction over paying a human to review their work - much faster and more affordable. Not something to be ashamed of imo. Never said problems like water usage should be ignored, they need solving. Will stop being moderate online now👋🔕
aug 4, 2025, 8:37 am • 0 0 • view
(tbh; random side ramble but. it's kind of ironic to mention veganism in this CAUSE of AI's resource consumption. Like, it goes completely against the idea of taking up veganism for environmental reasons.)
aug 3, 2025, 8:38 pm • 0 0 • view
Alas, it was the only comparison I could think of. I agree that the environmental impacts of AI are a concern. (As well as the obvious copyright and connection stuff mentioned above.) I just don’t think that blacklisting it in its entirety and telling people to be ashamed is productive or useful.
aug 3, 2025, 10:13 pm • 0 0 • view
Resumes are fair game. It's all slop down there baby.
aug 2, 2025, 11:35 pm • 1 0 • view
The single time I’ve used an LLM was trying to redo my cover letter and I’ll just say it did not work and I found far more value in paying a human to help me rework both resume and cover letter.
aug 3, 2025, 11:58 am • 0 0 • view
I'm a bit dim but it's MY stupidity and awkwardness and i refuse to cede it to some machine. it's not my thinking I'm giving up to it, it would be, ME, my natural expression I'm giving up. plus it is theft. and the resources. for what? so i can look smart until someone actually smart reads the shit?
aug 3, 2025, 10:23 am • 1 0 • view
It's an intelligence litmus test. If they can't realise AI is nonsense they can't comprehend why the rest of us care. Maybe because it sticks out like a sore thumb even if it hasn't hallucinated. It just has 0 flow, no one actually writes like AI
aug 2, 2025, 6:24 pm • 133 4 • view
Not even that. It's the same as not caring for the end result. It's like you make someone else do the work for you and claiming it as your own. The result has almost no emotional connection to the prompter and doesn't reflect an aspect of the person. No truth, representation of labour or intelect
aug 2, 2025, 7:22 pm • 92 3 • view
It also throws away an avenue to express yourself and to create evidence of your existence. I take pride in being able to point to the things I make as as accomplishment and a way to show an aspect of myself. Using genAI is like removing a way to communicate to others and isolate yourself
aug 2, 2025, 10:06 pm • 47 2 • view
Yup. It's just gross. If I found out someone was using an LLM to talk to me, I would be insulted.
aug 3, 2025, 3:08 am • 3 0 • view
Enh, depends on the context, whether you save any real time or effort, and what you use the saved time for. I don't see it as any different, morally, from any other technology.
aug 3, 2025, 3:04 am • 0 0 • view
There are some good reasons for using it, and other AI tools, but not for anything like essays, eulogies, texts, or for anything attempting to replace creativity.
aug 2, 2025, 7:15 pm • 9 0 • view
LLMs, because they're NOT AI, have yet to prove better than any alternative at doing anything substantive.
aug 3, 2025, 1:13 am • 1 0 • view
Like what
aug 2, 2025, 10:13 pm • 23 0 • view
Coding (not vibe coding), medical imaging and South Park making Trump PSA's.
aug 2, 2025, 11:29 pm • 1 0 • view
it's fine when ur using it to categorize a trillion trillion tiny units of noise data, like in genome sequencing or if you were to analyze the electrical signals traveling down your nervous system to affect your hand to articulate the immensely complicated musculature of flipping the bird at someone
aug 3, 2025, 6:21 pm • 0 0 • view
I am very much anti-LLM for most things, but the summaries of reviews on Amazon can be useful, to be honest.
aug 3, 2025, 1:25 am • 0 0 • view
It's useful for a lot of software development stuff, like diagnosing error messages, finding appropriate tools, explaining concepts etc. it's also good at identifying pictures, like what is this animal or plant?
aug 2, 2025, 11:26 pm • 0 0 • view
Alt text. STT models. A lot of undifferentiated heavy lifting type stuff.
aug 2, 2025, 11:55 pm • 0 0 • view
For other AI tools, aiding medical analysis and scientific research, neither of which are replacements for creativity. Personally for ChatGPT, it found errors in Excel spreadsheet formulas I was using which got me out of a hole when a deadline was approaching and the results didn't make sense.
aug 3, 2025, 6:21 am • 0 0 • view
Powershell scripts, but no id don’t use it for any of the reasons stated in the original post.
aug 2, 2025, 10:55 pm • 2 0 • view
give them a second while they ask ChatGPT what it's good for.
aug 2, 2025, 10:38 pm • 38 0 • view
It dramatically outperforms traditional optical character recognition software. It's okay for summarizing themes in open-ended survey questions across 100s to 1,000s of responses - when exact themes are unnecessary. Otherwise, it fits with areas where "minimum viable product" may be acceptable.
aug 2, 2025, 11:02 pm • 6 0 • view
While studying for exams last year my son asked it to generate sample questions. He then wrote the answers and asked it for feedback on his answers. That's better than anything you can do with a textbook. He's not blindly trusting it's right, but it's a useful addition to his study.
aug 3, 2025, 11:20 am • 2 0 • view
aug 2, 2025, 10:52 pm • 1 0 • view
I don't see it as a moral failing in the sense this person probably thinks. I see it an admission you can't be bothered to *genuinely* interact with people. Maybe there's a reason for it, like anxiety over whether we'll all hate you for saying the wrong things. If you can't be genuine, I can't care.
aug 3, 2025, 3:17 am • 8 0 • view
I don't mean that dismissively, I mean it precisely. I can't make a connection to *YOU*. I never MEET you. If you're not going to put your genuine self out there, I can't care to help you smooth a rough introduction over. If you're not going to offer your genuine thoughts, I can't care to hear it.
aug 3, 2025, 3:17 am • 11 0 • view
And that's before I start parsing "moral failings" at all. Like... what do you think you are doing? I highly, HIGHLY, doubt you're trying to do a Cyrano de Bergerac. (Because you totally missed the point of that play, if you are.)
aug 3, 2025, 3:19 am • 6 0 • view
I remember that user. They're a huge loser!
aug 3, 2025, 1:01 am • 0 0 • view
I don’t know how to use it and that’s because I don’t want to. I’d rather fumble with my lexicon in real life
aug 3, 2025, 12:35 am • 1 0 • view
i put that i didn't want chat gpt answers on hinge because i want to see something you wrote yourself and i've already gotten likes from people trying to argue me out of it. one was someone who said he was using chat gpt voice to text that was absolutely incoherent like bro it isn't working!!
aug 2, 2025, 11:20 pm • 1 0 • view
may i make a friendly amendment? "...people should be ashamed of doing it."
aug 2, 2025, 11:47 pm • 2 0 • view
Story time: My husband and I went out to a restaurant. Wonderful. Very impressed, my husband left a review on Google. A while later, the owner replies to the review and thanks us, addressing every single point in my husband's review. Wow, very detailed. Maybe too much so. /1
aug 4, 2025, 8:11 pm • 3 0 • view
Out of curiosity, we hopped over to ChatGPT. "You are the owner of a restaurant. Write a reply to this review: [paste in husband's review]" ChatGPT spat out almost identical reply. Husband was MAD.
aug 4, 2025, 8:14 pm • 3 0 • view
Because it *is* a serious moral failing
aug 3, 2025, 1:34 am • 3 0 • view
Someone once wrote me a Teams message clearly written by ChatGPT. Freaking Teams!
aug 2, 2025, 8:08 pm • 5 0 • view
*N.B.: speech to text is fine. Still your thoughts. It’s when you turn over the thinking that I have an issue with it. Know plenty of folks who are disabled (e.g., dyslexia, motor issues) who are great writers —they just need assistance with the getting it into print. Still their ideas.
aug 3, 2025, 5:26 pm • 15 0 • view
I know someone who had a stroke which affected not only their ability to type but their ability to retrieve words. They've found AI tools extremely helpful in communicating their thoughts at closer to their pre-stroke speed. But it's still their thoughts.
aug 3, 2025, 9:42 pm • 0 0 • view
It's mostly sentence completions, spelling etc. rather than paragraphs of connected ideas, and nothing gets out without review, edit, revision. But this does highlight the fact that the line between being human- and AI-generated can sometimes be fuzzy.
aug 3, 2025, 9:42 pm • 0 0 • view
I used to be in a business networking group, and people would use ChatGPT to write their 30 second intros we gave every week. You can bet your bottom dollar I looked down on and roasted that behavior. If you can’t talk about your own profession for 30 seconds off-the-cuff, you need a new gig.
aug 2, 2025, 9:36 pm • 91 3 • view
I agree, but I also remember struggling to write my own job description on resumes 20 years ago because everyone said you had to use as many keywords as possible or it gets tossed. I can see why it would be appealing.
aug 2, 2025, 11:25 pm • 17 0 • view
I’ve never used chatgpt for anything, but I feel there was probably an initial usefulness that became a slippery slope.
aug 2, 2025, 11:25 pm • 5 0 • view
For resume-building, I can see it. I struggled with writing resumes myself. But not being able to casually say “my name is so-and-so, I work for XYZ company, and my ideal referral owns an ABC-type of business” was pretty sad.
aug 3, 2025, 5:44 am • 2 0 • view
i will judge a person less harshly for this case, since you are writing your resume not for a human, but for the AI that screens resumes. that's a perfect time to use AI. (but i still won't, personally, due to the environmental impact).
aug 2, 2025, 11:30 pm • 41 0 • view
excellent point.
aug 2, 2025, 11:30 pm • 8 0 • view
THIS! It's already always been so hard to land certain jobs needed to at minimum pay bills, but now we have a little robot sorting through applications for even more specific keywords. It's FRUSTRATING. I completely understand the need to try fighting fire with fire.
aug 4, 2025, 4:05 pm • 4 0 • view
👆this is why I can’t abide the argument that educators should use it to craft assignments and assessments. If I can’t do that for material I am ostensibly an expert on, then *I * am the problem and I need to learn more!
aug 3, 2025, 5:35 pm • 2 0 • view
BNI? That org feels like a cult, and this is exactly the behavior I’d expect from some of the people I met, there.
aug 4, 2025, 3:14 am • 0 0 • view
Some chapters are better than others. Most of the folks at this one were great, I just didn’t have time to go every week. But AI is the type of shiny new magic bullet that salespeople absolutely love to overuse and abuse.
aug 4, 2025, 3:58 pm • 2 0 • view
AI is just a phase. It will eventually cancel itself.
aug 4, 2025, 12:06 am • 0 0 • view
Sloppers
aug 2, 2025, 11:01 pm • 5 0 • view
I dislike that my initials can be shorthand for "Machine Learning.". I even had to clarify that on my profile. I agree with what you say. I'm against AI when it is used to replace your mind when creating things. I am fine with dumbed down AI with small scope like denoising.
aug 3, 2025, 12:14 am • 1 0 • view
Being illiterate has been shamed for decades now. But there's nothing to be ashamed of when someone tries to learn writing. There is something to be ashamed of when someone enjoys being illiterate.
aug 3, 2025, 1:14 pm • 6 0 • view
Eulogies! Goodness
aug 3, 2025, 11:55 am • 0 0 • view
Remember the four big bads of AI, kids: It wastes extreme amounts of water It steals intellectual property It pushes fascist ideology It looks and sounds like shit
aug 3, 2025, 4:52 pm • 21 5 • view
Think one thing to note is it's water and/or electricity - which one it wastes more of depends on the server's location, but yeah it's a waste nonetheless.
aug 3, 2025, 7:34 pm • 2 0 • view
Plus may not be an issue once more AI companies use ARM/RISC processors. But that sadly takes time.
aug 3, 2025, 8:42 pm • 0 0 • view
Wouldn't really fix AI - if only because no matter how little it guzzles, that's still resources that would be better off going to Not The Fascist Plagiarism Machine. And it's a sort of 'i'll believe it when i see it' thing anyhow.
aug 3, 2025, 8:46 pm • 3 0 • view
Well sadly we are stuck with it so you take whatever you get. No regulations in the US so gotta get used to it.
aug 3, 2025, 9:05 pm • 0 0 • view
Is this what you say whenever anything bad comes along in life or?
aug 3, 2025, 9:33 pm • 1 0 • view
No just being realistic, the fight against AI in the US is hopeless as long as Trump is in office. I can adapt to AI and have even toyed with it, not out of laziness or out of defeat but to see how to use the tech in a practical manner and perhaps fight fire with fire.
aug 3, 2025, 9:47 pm • 0 0 • view
Same with people who use Gen AI for DnD character pics. Bruh, there are TONS of already made (by humans) pics you can use as placeholder, or a lot of character makers like Picrew. Is your character so shit you can't even be bothered with a google search or an avatar maker??
aug 3, 2025, 7:28 am • 11 2 • view
Yeah, I can't understand why you'd use AI for your character and not do it yourself. Why wouldn't you want to come up with your own ideas, use actual good resources and make your character, you know, YOURS.
aug 3, 2025, 7:57 am • 3 0 • view
I draw my characters myself, even do my personal OC version of characters I like from franchises because I want my personal take on them, I can't imagine leaving all creative process to a stealing program...
aug 3, 2025, 9:30 am • 4 0 • view
I'm not an artist so all my creative energy went into writing backstories and such. If I feel the need for a piece of art to be done of my OC, I'd much rather commission a friend or any other artist to do it. AI is so soulless
aug 3, 2025, 9:46 am • 3 0 • view
That’s why I’m just going to stick with A1 (not a typo) as Linda McMahon, our beloved secretary of education recommends.
aug 3, 2025, 12:50 am • 0 0 • view
This is an ableist position to take
aug 3, 2025, 8:51 am • 4 0 • view
When you have a nigh religious hatred of something as the Anti-AI crowd does, you tend to miss the details. I don't really care for AI but the ultra "I hope people who have ever used AI die ;-;" shit just hurts their entire side. I guess it feels good, though.
aug 3, 2025, 8:16 pm • 1 0 • view
No, you are just bringing up an extreme edge case and there are always going to be exceptions to any position someone takes.
aug 3, 2025, 8:59 am • 6 0 • view
Calling disability “an extreme edge case” is an ableist position to take.
aug 3, 2025, 9:00 am • 8 0 • view
Fine. Call it what you want.
aug 3, 2025, 9:04 am • 2 0 • view
Literally no-one here is saying they would think less of someone for using it for accessibility reasons. There is a BLATANT difference between your SEN daughter using it to better articulate herself, and some arsehole using it for his college essay because someone else has already done the work.
aug 3, 2025, 3:25 pm • 0 0 • view
“Literally no-one here” “If you're using AI to write essays … I do think less of you as a person” Personally I do not use AI for lots of reasons including moral ones, however I have also seen that it is a tool that can help some people who do not deserve to be judged for seeking that help
aug 3, 2025, 4:08 pm • 0 0 • view
"Accessibility reasons" Again, essay-writing isn't the same as someone who might actually need/use it as a support tool.
aug 3, 2025, 6:10 pm • 1 0 • view
my god the people saying 'it is good for this one simple task i like to use it for and nothing else' in these comments really need to look in a mirror, huh
aug 2, 2025, 11:26 pm • 16 0 • view
yep, absolutely. the one thing that unequivocally makes a person a person and have value as such is their mind. when you decide you don't care about your mind degrading to slop from lack of use, you have decided to not be a person anymore and i respect that decision by no longer seeing you as one.
aug 2, 2025, 11:22 pm • 3 0 • view
I don't know if I'd say moral failing, but adults who outsource basic thinking do earn a side eye.
aug 2, 2025, 6:59 pm • 26 0 • view
Imma say moral failing if they are around me, and probably worst :oP
aug 3, 2025, 1:20 pm • 7 0 • view
AI is built on theft. Supporting that is bad. Full stop.
aug 2, 2025, 6:31 pm • 408 7 • view
even if it wasnt outsourcing personal correspondence is making yourself less of a person
aug 2, 2025, 9:21 pm • 225 1 • view
every time I see that Meta Ray Bans ad I think: "really? you can't think of anything to make for dinner? you have no taste or interests of your own? you need a clanker to tell you the same thing it's telling everyone else?"
aug 2, 2025, 11:16 pm • 130 2 • view
Ok now, I do not like or use ChatGPT, but the "what tf will we have for dinner" question is valid! So as much as I hate Meta and OpenAI (and raybans, I guess?), that's good advertising!
aug 3, 2025, 10:21 am • 2 0 • view
It's not very different than rolling dice to figure out what to make. Sometimes ya don't know if you want a sandwich or pizza.
aug 5, 2025, 2:03 am • 0 0 • view
Of course rolling dice or flipping a coin doesn’t pollute a town each time you do it
aug 5, 2025, 3:54 am • 2 0 • view
Very true. All they cost is a few seconds. Server farms for AI and crypto suck.
aug 5, 2025, 4:58 am • 3 0 • view
I almost always want pizza but I'm (a) trying to manage my cholesterol and (b) raise a healthy child. (1/3)
aug 5, 2025, 6:46 am • 1 0 • view
So "what will I make for dinner" is a combo of what do i want to eat, what will the child eat, what ingredients do i have, what can i make in the time between finishing work and the child going feral with hunger, etc etc. (2/3)
aug 5, 2025, 6:46 am • 1 0 • view
I don't use an LLM for this nor do I suggest, advocate or recommend anyone else does. I'm just saying I see the attraction. And I know plenty of others would also see the attraction. So, using that issue to advertise is good advertising. (3/3)
aug 5, 2025, 6:49 am • 1 0 • view
I've not seen the ad, but it does sound like pretty good advertising. If dice aren't good enough I do normally just ask the kid what he wants and figure out if we need to go to the store(he only ever wants quesadillas or berries).
aug 5, 2025, 12:12 pm • 1 0 • view
Every time I hear about ray bans I have to go through the whole process of "wait people still buy ray bans" to "of course people still buy ray bans" to "it's right wing dudes isn't it" to "yep it's right wing dudes." It's like I've memory-holed the brand but it somehow keeps clawing back.
aug 3, 2025, 2:59 am • 45 0 • view
This is such a weird sentence about one of the most popular sunglass brands lmao
aug 3, 2025, 10:16 pm • 0 0 • view
the Brand Defenders have logged on
aug 3, 2025, 10:17 pm • 1 0 • view
I don't own a pair but they are quite literally a top 3 selling brand so what you're saying is hilariously at odds with reality and a bizarre thing to make a right or left issue lmao
aug 3, 2025, 11:03 pm • 0 0 • view
There was also this period between the 80s and Meta where people put up ads online about raybans which are usually an $800 value are now available for just $45 act fast
aug 3, 2025, 3:23 am • 15 0 • view
I got so many spam texts to my phone about ray bans in the 2010s that it poisoned the brand for me and I vowed to never, ever buy them. I know it was just scammers and not official, but it became synonymous.
aug 3, 2025, 3:35 pm • 7 0 • view
i wonder if that contributed to them being popular among right wingers
aug 3, 2025, 3:38 pm • 7 0 • view
What’s the problem with ray bans tho? Just normal ass sunglasses
aug 3, 2025, 7:55 pm • 1 0 • view
I wonder how many people articulating opinions like this railed against the evils of Napster and never made tapes for their friends or ripped things to MP3.
aug 3, 2025, 3:06 am • 2 0 • view
Napster wasn't a large corporation trying to manipulate the market and burn piles of money and trees in the hopes that no musician ever got paid again like a fuckin Ferngully villain I agree copyright infringement isn't theft though. I mean the people who own AI sure want us to think it is. but no.
aug 3, 2025, 10:03 pm • 1 0 • view
Me, for one.
aug 3, 2025, 10:43 am • 4 0 • view
You could train one on your own material and it not be theft. But, then you might as well just say what you want.
aug 5, 2025, 1:49 am • 0 0 • view
Not all AI is. But definitively, people becoming completely reliant on Cleverbot to perform basic tasks is going to end up benefitting all of us who do it manually a lot more because we will be paragons of writing an email
aug 3, 2025, 12:21 am • 1 0 • view
There's a corollary here in that the use of an LLM for knowledge work signifies that one doesn't actually care if things are true or why they are true, since whether an LLM outputs something factual or not is completely incidental to how it works.
aug 3, 2025, 9:02 am • 10 0 • view
How are people just learning that many people think that crap is bad
aug 2, 2025, 10:06 pm • 4 0 • view
These people do not realise the rot they are letting set in their brains. Brains are like muscles. You have to use them or they atrophy. People who use chatgtp to function in life might as well off themselves now. They clearly aren’t interested in living. Go to a vegetable ffs.
aug 3, 2025, 12:00 am • 9 0 • view
"Democrats need to do something about the epidemic of 'men using AI to try and impress women, but absolutely disgusting them'" is a dumb discourse we're going to live Soon
aug 3, 2025, 12:01 am • 3 0 • view
AI Ain’t It.
aug 3, 2025, 1:15 am • 0 0 • view
maybe we should hear out the people who use the plagiarism machine that runs on drought because it's shiny
aug 3, 2025, 8:26 pm • 1 1 • view
I am terrified of two things: my doctor using AI, and self-driving cars while I’m on a motorcycle
aug 2, 2025, 11:20 pm • 2 0 • view
I would be unhappy to find out ANY of these tasks were done by someone else on fiver. Except eulogies. I would be dead so I got other things to care about.
aug 3, 2025, 12:07 am • 0 0 • view
I don't understand why anyone would use AI. Hell, when I was working (lawyer), I usually had spell-check turned off since it was more likely to misspell something (or just use the wrong word), than I was.
aug 3, 2025, 5:43 pm • 6 0 • view
There were things about it that were very appealing - particularly as a person who does a lot of mandatory unpaid paperwork for their job - but it’s still not worth it.
aug 3, 2025, 4:47 am • 0 0 • view
I call them “sloppers”
aug 3, 2025, 2:24 am • 11 0 • view
As much as I think AI is awful for the planet, as a neurodivergent individual who sometimes can’t fucking speak, there are times I am thankful for it.
aug 2, 2025, 11:23 pm • 1 0 • view
I do, however, let people know I utilized it to make things digestible for them.
aug 2, 2025, 11:24 pm • 0 0 • view
I agree wholeheartedly, and fuck “chip”
aug 2, 2025, 7:39 pm • 0 0 • view
That's an instant slap upside the head from me. You ain't asking that thing nothin' while I'm around.
aug 2, 2025, 11:09 pm • 5 0 • view
Someone I was acquainted with was bragging about writing their master's thesis using chat gpt like they were so clever and outsmarting the system. I didn't think much of them before and I pretty much just stopped talking to them after that.
aug 2, 2025, 8:04 pm • 44 1 • view
I totally get why people would want to use LLM in like, an undergrad ge class but for your masters thesis is just horrible. If you don’t care enough to do that on your own why even go to grad school
aug 3, 2025, 4:18 pm • 1 0 • view
"I cheated myself out of an education. Pretty smart, huh?"
aug 8, 2025, 7:41 pm • 0 0 • view
"So you are bragging about not doing the work you came to this place to learn to do? Wow I thought you cared to learn to do the job you're studying for, I guess I was wrong"
aug 3, 2025, 7:31 am • 23 2 • view
A thesis should be something you poured yourself in to. In whatever way works for you. I wrote the majority of mine blackout drunk (the only time in my life I have blacked out), and spent the next 2 days proofreading and making sure all of my sources were correct.
aug 3, 2025, 12:45 pm • 0 0 • view
the person paying for the nazi site has a lot to learn about moral fails
aug 2, 2025, 9:18 pm • 9 0 • view
I was arguing with a cow orker about who should be responsible for X. Person asked ChatGPT what it thought my job was, then sent the resulting load of complete bollocks to me and copies to various others, claiming it as definitive proof. Person's arse was kicked all over the city.
aug 3, 2025, 9:27 am • 3 0 • view
Hard agree
aug 2, 2025, 11:39 pm • 0 0 • view
"in certain circles" Nah, everyone thinking less of those that use slop generators is a natural response.
aug 2, 2025, 10:54 pm • 6 0 • view
these are the same dudes who will then complain that they feel like they can't connect with people socially. no shit? "you" don't even exist at this point.
aug 2, 2025, 10:20 pm • 13 0 • view
I read an article where a guy talked about losing his son to a AI fueled mental break. The article ended with the man using AI to write his sons eulogy. I view people like that as a complete loss. They gave up their cognition and dont even miss it.
aug 2, 2025, 11:32 pm • 48 4 • view
I remember that. Specifically because that part stuck with me as well. Just a real "stop and look at nothing for a while" moment.
aug 3, 2025, 4:27 am • 8 0 • view
Yea it was a real "close your eyes and wish the world was different when you open them" moment.
aug 4, 2025, 1:03 am • 3 0 • view
They would have learned this much earlier than today if they read things written by real people.
aug 2, 2025, 11:31 pm • 2 0 • view
that would depend, does that friend boil the ocean while quoting mien kampf?
aug 2, 2025, 11:49 pm • 0 0 • view
A short real message is infinitly better than some screed spat out by a robot
aug 3, 2025, 3:07 pm • 1 0 • view
I wrote a 2.6k-word fanfic with my own two hands Tf's the excuse for these yahoos?
aug 3, 2025, 5:07 am • 8 0 • view
In fact, fuck it, here's the fanfic in question because I'm feeling nice www.deviantart.com/sandvich33/a...
aug 3, 2025, 5:08 am • 1 0 • view
Fractal Country is one to talk about morals considering what they did to one of my friends
aug 3, 2025, 3:39 pm • 2 0 • view
Everyone who uses AI should be forced to make a speech on the spot.
aug 3, 2025, 5:30 am • 4 0 • view
Mate, I have a co-worker using it to answer a game of "guess how many sweets in this jar" at work Even when it gave him an estimate of 450 - 475, he had to ask it again for a specific number, apparently unable to figure out what number might be between 450 - 475 by himself
aug 2, 2025, 10:43 pm • 12 0 • view
What was the real number?
aug 2, 2025, 11:08 pm • 1 0 • view
-25
aug 3, 2025, 1:04 am • 0 0 • view
I think it was 540 or something like that
aug 2, 2025, 11:09 pm • 7 0 • view
This is just comedy at this point.
aug 3, 2025, 12:19 am • 4 0 • view
if I'm getting married, and you use AI to write the best man's speech, I will remove you from my life
aug 3, 2025, 5:35 am • 4 0 • view
That’s why I never use a calculator. I’m not outsourcing my brain to a machine. I also NEVER use gps (learn to read a map, dumbasses).
aug 2, 2025, 10:02 pm • 2 0 • view
yeah, why use a calculator or gps when you can just ask ChatGPT now? They're all the same thing, aren’t they?
aug 2, 2025, 11:04 pm • 0 0 • view
no, because a calculator returns an answer to the question while an llm returns statistical noise resembling a potential answer
aug 3, 2025, 3:27 am • 4 0 • view
if you didn't use chatgpt so much you might be better-positioned to understand why this is such a dumb comparison.
aug 2, 2025, 11:07 pm • 15 0 • view
It’s a comparison you don’t like.
aug 3, 2025, 1:49 am • 1 0 • view
Yeah, because it's stupid. If I ask a calculator what the square root of 144 is, it will give me the same answer every time, no matter how many times I ask it. Gen AI is nowhere near as reliable or consistent.
aug 3, 2025, 3:03 am • 8 0 • view
There really does need to be a slur for ai users...
aug 2, 2025, 10:50 pm • 11 0 • view
Saw someone in the comments say sloppers, I kinda like it.
aug 2, 2025, 11:19 pm • 16 0 • view
Sloppers is great!
aug 3, 2025, 3:47 am • 0 0 • view
If you can't be bothered to write it, I can't be bothered to read it.
aug 3, 2025, 10:08 am • 9 0 • view
Yes. These things are hard. And that is actually the point. You struggle and stress, and you do the best thing that you can. And that's what people remember. Your struggle is the thing that create the value. Getting an AI to "help" defeats the purpose entirely. It makes it worthless.
aug 3, 2025, 4:53 am • 11 1 • view
i only use it to determine how many r’s are in the word strawberry
aug 3, 2025, 4:39 am • 1 0 • view
its majorly disappointing to learn if a friend uses it constantly
aug 3, 2025, 2:58 pm • 5 0 • view
My boss uses it constantly.
aug 3, 2025, 6:52 pm • 0 0 • view
There is an entire generation that don’t have the ability to write more than a couple of sentences for themselves. Apparently it is common in university for students to use ChatGTP to write their essays, apparently not realizing that it’s the learning of how to do it that is the important part.
aug 3, 2025, 12:39 am • 7 0 • view
People who do this stuff need to sit alone in an empty room for a while. They want to ask their memory a question but their heads are full of yelling so this phone ai garbage is a band-aid fix out of ignorance of the actual problem. Force them to think. If you know them force them off of the phone
aug 3, 2025, 12:58 pm • 1 0 • view
See also work product. If you "need" AI to do your job, you're probably in the wrong job.
aug 3, 2025, 4:27 am • 4 0 • view
It’s just so insanely selfish and lazy. These people are such entitled, whiny little deadbeats. Unwilling to put any effort into their goals; they just want a program to do it for them (poorly). And then have the AUDACITY of wanting to be seen as “creatives” when they are actually “thieves.”
aug 3, 2025, 4:57 pm • 2 0 • view