It absolutely was, and neither of these things you posted contradicts that.
Paperboy, amateur submarine captain, and part-time model.
698 followers 632 following 12,143 posts
view profile on Bluesky
It absolutely was, and neither of these things you posted contradicts that.
Her stance that there needed to be an immediate ceasefire followed by Israel's withdrawal, rebuilding of Gaza, and a two-state solution?
That there are not choices that will satisfy everyone and require no trade-offs is of course the reason politics exists.
Mid-90s NBA on NBC was literally the same four teams every weekend.
Why's it made out of a baguette, btw?
He literally said he's open to bathroom bans? Newsom is a scumbag, horrible on trans sports issues, and dumb as shit, but I haven't seen this.
I totally think we should indulge people who are still grinding the (checking notes) John Kerry axe from literally *21 years ago*
I mean, from what I've seen, not supporting Newsom to be the candidate is the overwhelming sentiment.
Damn, man, police sounds like a hell of an improvement.
That's a fucking tragedy then, considering how much worse things have gotten under the guy who told Netanyahu to hurry up and finish the job and gave him back the 2000 lb bombs that Biden withheld.
Wait, are you pro censorship or anti?
Oh, okay. The something congressional dems should do is something. That clears it up.
As a Washington fan, I thought I was past DeBoer schadenfreude. Turns out, I absolutely am not.
Probably should have said that instead of telling us that saying someone calling for immediate martial law and tribunals was nuts is walking willingly into the camps.
It couldn't possibly get any worse, I guess.
Do you think setting off a cycle of retaliatory violence is going to go well for you?
Listen up, dummies. A man very much smarter than you is talking.
We're all ears, man. What you got?
Nominative determinism is real
*liked by no one in the national political press
That is 100% irrelevant to the question of whether offspring that are neither of the two predominant sexes can be produced.
This seems like a real problem if you are arguing a maximalist position.
If you cannot lay out a rule that objectively sorts the hard cases into one of two exes, (b) cannot be true.
That is a different thing than "reproduction can only produce one of two distinct sexes"
In relation to his recognition by the US military, I think that's a perfectly reasonable position.
Donald, walk towards the dark
She does not seem the type who is aware of the concept of fun.
The Rapid Ride busses in Seattle are actually pretty good.
Sorry people on bluesky wasted your time.
No we don't. He sucks shit.
I can bring my own shovel.
Or ten years later.
I WILL kill him
Needs a hint more queasiness
I hate this so much. Bless you.
I only see one.
Uh oh. I hope no one signed a statement under penalty of perjury to the contrary and filed it with the court.
So why did we all have trash cans decades before NYC did?
It would be so easy, if your new thing is that being cynical and nihilistic is poisonous, to say "Yeah, I was a huge culprit and I've seen the damage it's done. Don't be like me." Saying you didn't mean it and everyone should lighten up rings real shallow.
What about town or county council?
I'm getting a little concerned about this recent trend of talking up how healthy primary fields are a good thing and then trying to clear the field for some new person who gets a little traction online. Let's maybe cool it until we are within 12 months of the general, huh?
And if they didn't realize these things are important and have consequences, it's time to grow the fuck up and come to grips with it.
So tell them what you want them to do.
Has she released her contract so we can see how hers is so much more ethical than the ones she's criticizing?
We all capitalize things strangely and don't use articles for some reason.
But what you guys do affect me here in Calgary greatly, so basically I know as much as you do (because I follow a bunch of nihilists)
I love how people disagreeing with him is evidence of group think. Seems kind of like ... the opposite?
I love having American politics explained to me by people who spell words centre and mobilising.
Her Substack is not funded by Omidiyar. It just gives her, personally, a lot of money to live on so she doesn't have to care if her Substack makes any money.
The reason they sought to paint it that way is that it is precisely what happened.
Watch the part where he qualifies Marisa Tomei as an expert witness.
The scenes from Better Call Saul where he's wheeling and dealing with prosecutors in courtroom hallways are pretty accurate.
You're a real monster for proposing that the government assist people in escaping the problem they're complaining about.
Saw Snow get booed off the stage in Vancouver.
Here's a guy arguing that *maybe* it's already a consolidated fascist state. Is that close enough?
He may not think he does, but he does.
You can tell people are very serious about how important it is that people be aware that fascists are running the government by the way they never actually talk about it, but rather complain about how Democrats are talking about it wrong.
It's close to Kent Des Moines Road
I meant the other one. I was agreeing with you.
And the coffee tastes like charcoal. But mostly fuck Schultz.
That the government can't take your property without due process and just compensation is literally in the Constitution.
Roll that baby up in a burrito and nestle it between some beans and rice.
Only slightly below baby in a spaghetti pot.
Baby in a bucket is also delightful.
Oh damn, I haven't seen one of these dumb as shit "actually, popular artists are conservative coded" pieces in a long time. This really takes me back.
My fucking cold, dead hands.
"Associated with" "Vast majority" These are not words you use when a strict binary exists.
Man, if my free speech absolutism led me to a place where I concluded that nothing can be done to prevent AI from killing more suicidal people, I'd probably have some deep thinking to do.
That's crazy that she spoke in the third person like that.
It's like "there is no racism, just class conflict" but WAY WORSE. I did not realize this was possible, but probably should have.
Nah. Get lost with this "ends justifies the means" bullshit.
Yeah, "you grow dependent on their money and they pull the rug the second they don't like what you publish" is not a great business plan.
Probably depends on who the shit-talkee is, tbh.
Unless this is your patient, your read of this child is meaningless.
Well said
"I should be able to take their money and spend all my time sabotaging other people paid to promote the message"
I mean, the reaction to this is a symptom of the reason Democrats have these "messaging problems" and why the dream of building lefty media infrastructure is pretty optimisitic.
I certainly wouldn't do it the day before I published an article about how influencers and the people who give them money sometimes sign contracts that keep that relationship confidential.
This is what stuck out to me too. "This thing that dems are doing is soooo shady. Shame on them. Also, they're pathetic because they didn't do it 20 years ago."
Does he think most popular artists are the same age as the majority of their fans? I don't think this has ever been true.
"I'm old"
Journalists really need to get comfortable with the question "Do you think we're stupid?"
This is a good dog.
Really something, huh?
I didn't know there were sovereign biologists.
Okay, why don't you continue this conversation with your straw man friend and not tell me what I'm saying. Have a nice time, you two.
That is not at all what I said.
Your claim is that there is some critereon by which the entire population can be sorted into either female or male with no third category. For some reason, you are not able to identify what this critereon is.
He was elected to be a legislator. One of 435 members who need a majority of that body and concurrence of the other house of Congress to set policy. His caucus chose him to lead the caucus.
You don't want that either. Also, not the thing he was elected to do.
I thought you were talking about the Democrats.
You don't want Jeffries to lead you. Be serious.
Why is it always the guys who would be first up against the wall who talk like this?
I feel like if people were really concerned with alerting people to how dangerous the current GOP control of the federal government is and building a movement to fight it, they would be talking about something other than how Democrats are messaging wrong. Like the things the GOP is doing for example
How do I reconcile making fun of you being condescending?
Oh, I'm so dumb. I don't understand why Trump trying to fire a member of the fed board is bad because Hakeem Jeffries did not walk me through all the finer points of it. I guess everything is fine and dandy.
Who are the people who are only getting their information from Hakeem Jeffries statements?