It can be about more than 1 thing. US antiquated power grids will be strapped due to AI and computing needs, water too. Alternative energy helps individual power consumers. US is cooked because won't spend even more for infrastructure upgrades later when we won't spend less now, try to go backward🙁
The number of people earning federal min has decreased? No isht Sherlock since more and more states have increased their minimum wage while the federal wage hasn't moved off $7.25 for decades.
HBO did a 360, when?
F that. I deserve a doggie. Doggies luv me and I luv them.
Yea I can get violent towards asshole deflective behavior. That's you. I bring up car prices and you say not new but used. So I cite info about used cards and then you defect off to some B.S. You sound mad I kept sending info for you to look at. So you just skippee if for personal attack. F off then
You're the deflector. Wages for the lowest wage earners haven't went up along with prices. That's the whole point the other person started with and you came in with some violent disagreements on median this and median that. F the median if folks below that are falling behind-you conveniently ignore🤷🏾♀️
Yet your median used car buyer faces skyrocketing used car prices in 2025 also 🙁 Nothing is flat or getting cheaper for those with stagnant wages over last number of years. Even veggies and meat are inflating faster than wages www.consumeraffairs.com/news/used-ca...
I thought you were the median man😮the avg new car is around $50k www.moneygeek.com/resources/av...
What's median wage have to do with minimum wage and those below the median. Those below the median are the ones getting squeezed and not keeping up in the economy. Middle class folks have 8 yr car notes for $80k cars that used to be 5yrs and 50k a few years ago. Higher Ed & other things are up up
You're the expert here. Spell it all out for us? You might make some sense and convert some people to believe what you're saying. If you don't want to put out the actual comparison stats on real wages or wages vs cost of living over last few years or decades, then🤷🏾♀️
The guy you addressed in this comment is deflecting and talking about everything but you comparison. You must be onto something with some good clarification information. You can't only mention 1 and not the other and be credible? We're in new information era though so idk🤷🏾♀️ make up whatever you want😮
Whatever, yet your reply only mentioned 2014 median wage info? You left out any accommpanying comparison on cost of living for the PAST DECADE, correct? You can reply to Amelia's quote which included comparison analysis on both cost of living and median wages. It's disingenuous to only mention 1?
It's gonna get tougher since govt fired hundreds of thousands, killed work improvement projects resulting in unemployment for more thousands, stopped or restricted needy people assistance like Medicaid, Snap, meals on wheels, FEMA, school lunches, etc? Plus tariffs raise prices-foreign & domestic🙁
You left out comparison analysis on cost of living vs median wage, and limited the wage data only back to 2014? How convenient. What about this comparison "Since 1980, the cost of living has increased over 300%. The average wage has increased 24%. Please tell me how that makes us any better off"
Locking up homeless and mentally disabled people is straight from the German concentration camp playbook🙁
It's already being done in America with medical care for all seniors. It's named Medicare and has been working for decades,right?
It wasn't King Obama, it was actually one of the legislators in Congress that held his lobbyists' position down to push their bill through Congress. Later Obama pushed him out of Congress and made him an ambassador to another country or some executive title like that.
Supply and demand for workers dictates hiring or firing more than stock market returns. You sound stupid af
It was actually based of the classic "Heart of Darkness" by Joseph Conrad, but if you liken it to Huck Finn classic then OK. I've read em both -I'm so special, lol. Apocalypse Now and it's Redux are longtime favs too.
Hold on to ya cooze lol. You won't be disappointed -click on it ASAP
No way inhell a governor is talking childish cheap talk mess like this.
Foh, idgaf if you've been living on border or being a coyote, mule or wannabe. Where were the legalities I was wrong at? People live all over America and don't know what they are FN talking about stuff happening in their own backyard. You sound silly with all the drivel.
There aren't enough Immigration judges to process cases of those who-entered with inspection and are asylum seekers, or any other "legal immigrant." Bc there's a ton of them. Small amt of lIllegal immigrants are easy to process. They're subject to removal/deportation and some even expidited removal
Again. I said there is a difference between illegals jumping fences and hiding from border patrol agents. If you can enter with inspection at a border crossing then you are not an "illegal immigrant" so the point is all the news w/long lines of folks waiting to enter were not entering illegally
The silly part is just limiting this exercise to billionaires and not multimillionaire in the same boat. There's way more people and assets when you drop down from 1b folks to include all the 500m folks. Then again it may make more sense checking for the 500m to 100m folks-SS exclusion limit=176k🤷🏾♀️
Contrast the sneakers w/ huge amount of people properly lining up at border crossing/using that deleted customs app to get court dates and put in immigration processing system. TX wasn't flying "illegals" to Chicago/CA/D.C? TX was flying those who entered w inspection to those other cities🤷🏾♀️
Honestly it would help if news and govt stats made it easy to find the number of "illegals" who sneak across border coyote style and find them yrs later working some where and they can be subject to removal, can't get green card without leaving and coming back later properly (w/inspection). Contrast
EWI as enter with inspection and/ot enter without inspection. Maybe I twisted up you meaning with mine, but my point is the same- you're not considered an illegal when you identify yourself at border checkpoint for processing. That's not coyote sneaks. legalservicesincorporated.com/immigration/...
So you are confusing illegals to include people that EWI-enter with inspection? Folks aren't climbing fences and dodging traffic when you can walk up to the border inspection crossing, identify yourself, get logged in with asylum/future court dates as a parolee & allowed to stay in US till notified?
Are you supposed to see all the people climbing walls/crossing rivers or any illegal entry like that? The mule/coyote transporters kinda work to not be so open/obvious since they are sneaking across if possible right? Nothing to do with those who EWI, but too many people don't know they differ
"Not working" as GOP intended, yep. tank the bipartisan immigration deal Congress made during Biden admin. GOP has been tanking immigration deals since before Bush Jr. New big budget put in big$ for new Maga ICE agent hiring, but if they wanted to process these IC cases, $ coulda went to there too🤔
Oftentimes it's the girl getting their bf in trouble, into a fight, dead, arrested. Here the gf was 100% right in telling her bf to stfu. Now she got a ticket instead of a warning and he's getting pulled out of the car to see if the cops can find anything further on him-maybe he's drunk &stupid here
Not to bad. Just understand that's the minority. Just recently during Biden era, folks had all the "open border" media outrage and scare tactic of photos with people in long lines at immigration/border crossing. Those were people properly, not illegally, entering with inspections w/ct dates etc
Define "entering the country illegally" because apparently most people don't know and think non-citizens means illegal or something. Most non citizens are here legally after entering with inspection and then are in some stage of the immigration process. That's how the process works as intended
Entry with inspection is the proper way to enter. Entry without inspection is the problematic type. Do you even know what your ranting about? Most people are sneaking up via mule and climbing over a border wall. They line up and a border inspection site to get legally processed into the country=EWI
Doesn't even seem like you know how to define or categorize people "entering illegally." You sound like 1 of those who thinks any asylum seeker or others walking across the border for inspection and parole status are "illegals." You don't get green cards, work visas, etc if you didn't legally enter
The poor white voters you allude to have been voting the same way since before LBJ was POTUS, but go off on Sanders and the last 10 years. There's no miracle workers
Yea, shut up and goto work now though🙂Nobody at work that you report to really cares about you, it's like that sometimes
It's unethical for team management to speak to a player client without their agent/representative present, or allowing the meeting.
Back that thang up! www.facebook.com/reel/6988415...
Pure cane sugar COLAs😮No HFCS
Trust? That's the bs folks are still on🙁What's it gonna take since the books have already been cooked.
GDP down in his 1st quarter Jan-March but go off.
Yea, but I don't deserve it and lots of others don't either. #WTTTY
But where's your before and after also.
Of course you wear pants. Apparently gray sweatpants
2 months before his retirement vs 15 years of playing? Yea the last 6 months of August camp through January was the last straw for the wife (just her only and not the kids/rest of fam members).
Wanting to kill people is different than not caring about destroying/killing people while being more interested in bottom line/profit margins is not surprising?
Get a grip. This IS the new normal. Back to the Future is what's in store for us. Step by step into the upcoming years we will get things back to the way it was.
Cuts down on the motivation to go fishing in lakes and rivers when you know the local waters are filled with toxins🤮. Not really about the catch and release. I'm LF ocean fish to eat at least
We will get back to that future soon enough🙁
Get them home water filters ASAP. F them kids and everybody else drinking chemicals. Where's Erin Brockovich at. We're going Back to the Future with more toxins in our air, water etc just like the old days a few decades ago. Oldies don't gaf as much about environmental stuff. Like my mom said once
The reckoning is here and this is part of it all. #BTTF We're going Back to the Future. F clean air and clean water😩we don't need air or water to live
Maybe read the article about her? Her picture is in there "Fereshteh Emami, an analytical chemistry professor who served as a principal investigator on the Air Products Lake Maurepas Monitoring Project, was officially removed from the project Thursday but is still employed by the university." #BTTF
The reckoning is here. This stuff is how it starts-Back to the future.
Aja done up with forehead shining❤️
I'd have been sitting right in the pool with him
Just get one of those cheap blowup kiddie pools. Wish I had thought of that years ago for my retriever RIP myboy
Intravenously is crazy lol
😮How does this affect LeBron's legacy
Don't worry if you're worried about bad things.
Remember those are the professionals. "We in here talking about practice"
Only Democrat voters expect perfection from Democrat policymakers while those voters ignore the GOP's near perfect record on obstructionism and lack of bipartisanship legislation which hampers Democrat legislation. Then Democrat voters take out their frustration on Dem party. Perfect for GOP 🤷🏾♀️🙃
Does the milk taste the same though😮 so bad for that one, lol
Isn't that basically what the player said once he didn't get an extension offer?
You love to argue and you finish by arguing against yourself vs how you started replying to me. You gotta be right if your going take every side of a discussion so you can make it into your arguments. You seem insufferable. Full circle just to argue against yourself-lapped yourself in the 400m🤡
Dude you're the one impeaching your own credibility and flip flopping. Now your arguing that all players should be unanimous but you started justifying taking a vote from a lock like Ichiro, so he wouldn't be unanimous, bc you want to give it to a player on the fence like Abreu so he can get in
You're the one worried about borderline, last chance guys getting into the HOF. Now you're making no sense about anybody going into the hall should have been unanimous. Stop covering your ass after you've bent over for Abreu all day. So Cooperstown only has 1 bust in there-remove all others, lol🤡
This is you and baseball history=Hey Mike Trout-F you-some writers ain't gonna vote for you even though writers and fans like this asshat Fat Greek Dad all know you are a worthy first ballot HOFer. Jim Rice or some borderline guy needs that vote more than you and this is the only way he gets in🤷🏾♀️
I hope it stays as only 1 player being the only unanimous selection for the future history of baseball so there is an everlasting reminder of baseball writer trash credibility. Maybe writers first 3 or 4 selections should be publicized🤔 get those 1st few locks in or else feel some heat
Every year or so this non-unanimous bs rears it's head and leaves a bitter taste in my mouth with these sanctimonious baseball writers. You are horrible at reading people and even self awareness of your own perspectives. I feel dumber for having engaged and you're dug in on the bs.
I don't support isht about baseball HOF voting, dumbass-you do! You're the one arguing it's cool to take clear votes from someone nobody should be voting against just to give them to a guy on his last yr or 2 of eligibility just so he gets in bc you think he should be in but it hasn't happened yet
Your back to full circle and you're making up stuff for me and ignoring or not understanding my point. I got yours. My point is the same one made by someone every year some SSA writer dicks over a player everyone knows that everyone else should have voted for. Fcuk beisbol writers w/the disrespect
Every player enshrined doesn't deserve unanimous selection dummy. I never said that, but if you can't identify many of ones that should have been unanimous then just stfu bc anybody with credibility isn't about to argue against Mantles, Mays, Aaron, Babe etc. Your understanding is low or you dgaf
You should be saying never mind a HOFer who was a unanimous selection. Your trash for even trying to defend the fact there has only been 1 unanimous selection in the history of the game. That's ridiculous and so are you. It's disrespectful to the game and the players who earned the votes.
No it's not based on statistical comparison or computer could let us know inductees each year🙁. You're ok gerrymandering votes from locks to vote for guys who are on the fence over a number of years. You want to ignore the-are they in or out analysis with those guys-maybe it means they should be out
If the 10 vote rule was abolished then trash writers would still be intentionally not vote for some players that obviously deserve to be voted in immediately. You ignore that part of your 10 vote analysis and it was never about that with me.
Again, you don't know what tf I value and your conclusions are all wrong. I value voters not disrespecting the game by not voting in consensus locks. not while following bs reasoning like-make sure nobody is unanimous since Babe Ruth wasn't and silly crap you keep ignoring in the process.
Yes maybe a writer who systematically holds out from voting for 1st ballot HOFERS should be outed and removed from voting 🤔If they fudge votes with 1st ballot guys, there is likely to be fudging with other players like middle tier guys or on the cusp guys down to their last yr or 2 of eligibility.
Would you have voted for Ichiro to be in HOF? Of course you would have if you have any credibility, and it's not a good argument that, well I really wanted Abreu to get in and Ichiro was a lock so I disrespected Ichiro leaving him out. You also don't need comparison/stats like Yaz/Arod, top20 etc
Why are you worried about me vs all the writers not voting him in. If they all won't then why would I? I'm a tough grader and tend to think if there is some boderline debate/argument needed then probably not. Everyone can't get in. IMO true HOFers don't need debates and stat compiling/comparisons
Obviously you're just reading to reply and not to understand & you dgaf about voting. That voter could have just not wanted unanimous vote-in vs your undervalued sympathy vote? We don't know, but we know the history of modern baseball writers saying nobody should be unanimous since Babe Ruth wasn't🤷🏾♀️
No, YOU have issue w/writers rejecting Abreu. You want me to have issue w/ALL multiple writers not voting in Abreu vs the 1 writer who really should have been aligned with all other voters on Ichiro? Since it's several writers to where he's not in, just maybe Abreu isn't HOFworthy? We know Ichiro is
some players don't get in on the 1st eleigible ballot year, and it takes them a few years of voting. Some players get in very late like last year or 2, and some don't ever get in. If you have to take a vote from a lock to vote in a guy on the cusp/last yr or 2, arguably maybe shouldn't be in at all?
It's a direct result of foul voters following your redirecting process like it's required or like it should be a generally acceptable voting principle to get more players into the HOF. It's real simple, some players are obvious 1st ballot HOFers (they always seem to get in on 1st ballot also🤔),
It's a subjective voting process. What data do you have for your proposition to debate. Don't need debates for 1st ballot HOFers, that's the point. If some player keeps falling short then maybe the voters have spoken loud & clear about that player also? The only injustice is denying unanimous player
😮MLB voter/writers out here "gerrymandering" votes away on the regular to where it's accepted as a regular occurrence and people like you argue for the injustice however so slight😡 Transparent voting helps against this? Say it only 1 or 2 voters shown as the systemic "unanimous redirectors"🤔 bye?
Your reading comprehension is trash. That redirection bs is what needs to stop-obviously. Respect the game & HOFers! The fact that there has only been 1 unanimous 1st ballot HOFer in the history of America's past time just shows how much bs goes into America voting and it ain't just beisbol votes🙁
You're all over the place except on the nearly annual bs that needs to stop when a writer or 2 disrespects an obvious 1st ballot HOF. That needs to stop and if the Bobby Abreu's don't get in over all their years of eligibility then maybe obviously they didn't deserve to be in.
Why are you worried about me when multiple voters don't vote for him?Maybe there's the simple answer🤔 Respect the game! So when obvious 1st ballot HOFers come up, then quit dicking around and vote accordingly & respect that player. Obviously if you have to debate an Abreu type then maybe not HOFer?
Obviously Ichiro is a lock if he only missed by 1 vote on 1st ballot? Voter who intentionally didn't vote for him is a tool? Transparent voting helps prevent this stupid isht? You go crunch the Stat numbers to satisfy what ever comparison argument you want. Go find 10 locks in the stats too, lol
The obvious answer to your silly question is to pick the 10 locks you want? That's not even the undervalued scenario you originally mentioned. If some player is on his last yr or 2 of eligibility then maybe he actually isn't deserving and isn't really "undervalued" to where he needs a sympathy vote
You do you doing make-believe and skipping the real scenario that repeats too many years to give writers' credibility? Besides the beginning years of HOF do you have any modern era years with 10 locks to vote for that you're so focused on? None, not 1 yr and not 2.
It's the HOF and already a tough standard to meet. There's not 10 locks per year so stop fantasizing and stick to the annual scenario where a should be unanimous player gets screwed. The fact it's only 1 or 2 haters not voting for a 1st yr lock kinda proves the player is a lock.
Overlooking locks is original scenario. 10blocks/year how the voting often goes? No but way to make up a useless fantasy in your head to argue in support of irrelevant narrative though. If you skip a lock to vote in a player who you think is an undervalued player, then who's being undervalued then🤔
You have 10 votes and think you have more than 10 locks, but don't know what to do? Besides the fact that's totally different than the original scenario, thank gosh you're not voting. I see how there have been wild national votes over the last couple of decades.
Your ignorance of the past is bad enough. Look forward.
Give the $ directly to the homeless people to use for housing.
Then the lock(s) need to receive votes, and the non locks may miss a vote. Voters are just doing dumbisht to keep players from being unanimous entries like a reverse badge of honor.
So you want a need a new special prosecutor to go over the evidence and conclusions of the old special prosecutor Mueller 🤡 Even if your contention wasn't straight bs, let it go, lol. You're forgetting about this new SCOTUS presidential immunity era🙃