How the New Yorker tries to dishonestly demonize and destroy America.
Presenting truth and an alternative perspective in a dishonest echo-chamber
46 followers 5 following 3,110 posts
view profile on Bluesky
How the New Yorker tries to dishonestly demonize and destroy America.
Oh, the irony of posting this on social media. :-)
Dumb and amoral wishful thinking.
Actually, the point was that you are excessively easily annoyed, while continuously not admitting that you were wrong about your statement of an "absolute" fact being magically "subjective" because it is "your" post.
Stephen King: Advocating for the sexualization of minors. What a disgusting loser.
This ought to work: Calm down!
I don't think you know what the word "absolute" means. • free from imperfection • having no restriction, exception, or qualification • positive, unquestionable • independent of arbitrary standards of measurement • fundamental, ultimate • perfectly embodying the nature of a thing
Conversely, some Christians justified slavery using scripture, particularly in the U.S. South. Overall, Christian ideas fueled abolition but didn't uniformly oppose slavery historically.
However, Christian principles of equality before God (Galatians 3:28) later inspired abolitionists. In the 19th century, Christian reformers like William Wilberforce in Britain and Quakers in America used faith-based arguments to push for abolition, significantly influencing anti-slavery movements.
No. The truth is nuanced but leans in favor of Christianity. Christianity's role in stopping slavery is mixed. Early Christians accepted slavery as a societal norm, with biblical texts like Ephesians 6:5 instructing slaves to obey masters.
Hello, closed-minded anti-American, look them up yourself.
You need a mirror. Schools and teachers are also supposed to be "safe havens and guardians", and look at all the sexual abuse by teachers against children. It has to do with the violence of the Muslim immigrants because the Left is always pouncing on priests, and ignore the violence by immigrants.
Obviously. I never claimed otherwise. "Mainly" is the key word here.
They matter in a show-trial.
I already explained why. Debunked? How?
No, anal sex is more likely to cause tears in the skin since the anus is not able to expand as well as a vagina (sorry for all the uncomfortable words), and that makes HIV blood transmission from one to another much more likely. Also, I think gays have a lot more sex than heteros.
No. Just because there is a very MINOR connection to the Nazis, doesn't mean that Cultural Marxism is Nazi propaganda. The truth is far more sinister. Cultural Marxism’s Origins: How the Disciples of an Obscure Italian Linguist Subverted America libertarianinstitute.org/articles/cul...
Nope, that's not true. The evidence in the impeachment "trials" was weak and largely made up. The Judges, DAs, and jurors in the trials were avid anti-Trumpers. So, winning is all that matters to Democrats. Truth be damned. We already know that.
He's trolling the Left, again, and it worked. Trump has said repeatedly that he doesn't know what Q-Anon is. Trump is the most pro-Israel and pro-Jew president America has ever had. Just ask any Israeli.
I dislike Candace Owens, but her video on this topic is pretty good. The Plantation: Then and Now www.prageru.com/videos/the-p...
Well, yes, they are both "establishment", until Trump and MAGA came on the scene. Now MAGA Republicans are pro the American PEOPLE. The Southern Strategy is a Democratic myth. Two videos to illustrate this: Why Did the Democratic South Become Republican? www.prageru.com/videos/why-d...
How about you just be quiet and try to learn something here. Intelligent people are having an adult conversation.
Every situation can be maliciously interpreted. I would say that Trump did what he did. You can call it pandering. I chose to call it tolerance. I think my interpretation is more realistic.
True, no evidence, but tons of observations of Trump's positive actions. I might be wrong, but right now, that's what I believe.
How did HIV get into the blood the vast majority of times? Anal sex and drug use. The Nazis hated gays, Jews, Gypsies, the handicapped, all to rile up the ignorant masses onto their side. Very similar to how the Democrats and Communists refer to Conservatives, MAGA, and Trump. See the correlation?
Trump is often tongue-in-cheek and he trolls the left. A lot. And the Left doesn't see it, and they lose their minds. It's hilarious to us.
The only thing is the stage, and that was likely a dumb oversight. The others are silly. A T-shirt with a similar layout. Ordinary numbers that are suddenly taboo. Losers marching decades ago with common words that are, in themselves, benign. They can convey bigotry, AND they can convey patriotism.
Yeah, it's Cultural Marxism. And yes, it does have meaning, a lot of meaning. It's pervasive in our culture. Hundreds of girls who lost their titles disagree. It's long, but worth it: How Cultural Marxism Threatens the United States—and How Americans Can Fight It www.heritage.org/progressivis...
Those were all partisan show-trials, Soviet-style. We'll see about the tariffs ruling. I'm sure Trump will appeal, and win, again. Of course the Democrats will try to impeach him, again. That doesn't make it right or justified. It just shows how corrupt and evil the Democrats are.
Having the legal right to do something doesn't make it morally right. Those can be two very different things.
You're either delusional or a bot. I can only deduce that you don't know what quotes are.
You obviously haven't listened to Ben Shapiro very much. He's one of Trump's biggest critics on many issues. The Democrats are increasingly totalitarian. You probably haven't heard of the "horseshoe theory". The Democrats are power-hungry, and lack the guard-rails of Christian values of the right.
OK, here are times before 2014:
The hotlines were likely promoting genital mutilation of children. He is enforcing Title IX as it should be: No men in women's sport or bathrooms. Why does the Left suddenly not care about girls and women anymore? Why is it MAGA that does?
Sexuality has no business in the military and Fed agencies. Abnormal and not conducive to human flourishing sexual behavior should not be promoted in museums. HIV is largely caused by promiscuous sex out of marriage. It's easily avoidable. Not every behavior needs to be bailed out by the taxpayers.
You don't seem open to any rational debate. Why should I bother?
Like I said, many of us are not happy with that one particular move. We also acknowledge all the good things Trump is doing, so we're willing to give him some grace on this one misstep. Often, Trump listens to us, so we'll see.
"88 foot flagpoles, white nationalist imagery on DHS sites and double capital Hs" I think the Left are the one's seeing dog-whistles and bogeymen everywhere. None of us noticed these things until you guys pointed them out.
We were willing to "believe all women" and we were willing to be tolerant and accepting of effeminate men and butch women, but the Democrats and Social Marxists took it too far when they insisted that boys compete in women's sports and go into their bathrooms, indoctrinated and mutilated children.
How? A bigger total number, with a small trans population and small trans shooter number, makes the white male side proportionally larger. Am I overlooking something?
None of that is true. The executive Branche has the authority to do exactly all those things. Don't you think that the Democrats would have successfully sued him for those things, if he didn't have the authority? Come on! They've been trying to sue and impeach him for 8+ years now.
Good for you, unless you're a Communist or anarchist.
I am certain that Ben Shapiro opposed Trump's investment in Intel in one of his recent shows. There are many more such worries on the Right, me included. BTW: Our main worry, besides the ideological one, is that the Democrats will use it as justification to it too. www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...
You're wrong again about MAGA and LGBQ:
Here's part of the reason: Trump Demands Intel CEO Quit Over China Ties: ‘Highly Conflicted’ www.dailywire.com/news/trump-d...
Then Trump is even more obviously not a National Socialist. Since you define it as a specific name given by Hitler to his movement, then Trump would have to have claimed that affiliation by name, and he obviously never has, nor would. No. People cannot transition from one sex to another.
Appreciated. I am enjoying this debate with you because you are being honest.
Its funding, primarily from left-leaning philanthropist Michael Klein, and minor ties to groups like the Joyce Foundation, suggest some influence
Critics argue this inflates numbers compared to stricter FBI or NIJ definitions, potentially skewing perceptions. However, GVA's data collection from over 7,500 sources is rigorous, earning high factual credibility.
GVA uses a "broad definition of mass shooting". The Gun Violence Archive (GVA) has a slight to moderate left-center bias, often cited by anti-gun advocates due to its broad definition of "mass shooting" (four or more people shot).
No, he has not violated the Constitution. The Democrats have no respect for the Constitution, except for when they can increase their power by (ab)using it. Support for Trump is support for freedom and the American way.
So, being an anti-American socialist is OK, but being a socialist who loves America is not OK? Weird. No, we're OK with LGB and Q. We're only opposed to the "T", which doesn't exist. Many of us in MAGA are also not thrilled with Trump wanting to invest in (not "take over") 9.9% of Intel.
Prove your claim, as I did mine. Again, not a phobia. My dislike for Islam is based on years of research and study of the writings. None of your Catch-22 gobbledygook can change that.
This seems to contradict your claim:
Yes, I saw that. I just wonder if the BASIS of your calculations is flawed. The UNDERLYING data. That 's why I asked for the source of your data. Why are you hesitant to provide it?
Especially the "moral" part.
Wrong again. I support nationalism for EVERY American, regardless of their race, sex, ethnicity or whatever. I kinda think Democrats don't fulfill this requirement: Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. John Adams
No, Trump is most obviously not a "National Socialist (fascist)". I do not, nor have I ever claimed to, support "white nationalism". I support nationalism for every American, regardless of their race, sex, ethnicity or whatever. I despise fascism. Once again, you are wrong on almost every issue.
Those are some very impressive calculations. Seriously: Kudos! What was your source for numbers of "mass shootings"? 4.000 mass shootings in 7 years sounds insane. Where did that number come from?
Not irrational, and not a phobia. But, you do you. The explicit seeds were planted by Christianity. If the Romantic Movement made them blossom, then good for the Romantic Movement.
Disagree. Any objective analysis of the texts and the resulting cultures strongly show otherwise.
Nothing makes slavery "OK". However, context matters. All cultures had slavery. Only the Christian cultures ended it (fist England, then America) and then even forced other cultures to end it. Muslim and Asian cultures still have slavery, to this day. Western culture is a net good in this world.
We're both making claims we have not provided any evidence for. It's time for some data.
* nationalist: The belief that nations will benefit from acting independently rather than collectively, emphasizing national rather than international goals. The belief that a particular cultural constitutes a distinct people deserving of political self-determination.
You just proved my point. Almost all of your claims are false. No cult. Real patriotism. No insecurities. Not fascist. Yes unapologetically nationalist*.
Critics argue these parallels show borrowing, while Muslims assert the Qur'an corrects earlier revelations. Lack of direct access to Christian texts in Arabic and Muhammad's illiteracy complicate claims of copying, suggesting oral transmission or shared cultural traditions as likely influences.
The Qur'an, which Muslims believe was revealed to Muhammad, shares narrative elements with Christian texts, such as stories of Mary and Jesus, but with distinct differences in theology (e.g., Jesus is not divine in Islam).
Key similarities include monotheism, reverence for figures like Abraham and Jesus (viewed as a prophet in Islam), and concepts like heaven, hell, and judgment.
Islam: You say "derived". I say heavy "derived". Muhammad, living in 7th-century Arabia, interacted with Christians and Jews, gaining exposure to their beliefs.
Jesus emphasizes personal dignity, compassion, and redemption, prioritizing the individual’s salvation and relationship with God (Luke 15:4-7).
No. Valuing the individual came way before that. Christianity values the individual as created in God's image (Genesis 1:27), inherently worthy and loved by God (John 3:16). Each person has unique purpose (Ephesians 2:10) and equal spiritual value (Galatians 3:28).
I think the transgender shooter RATE might be higher if you compare the RATES based on their respective populations. Example: Group A: Population = 100 people. Shooters: 10 people Group B: Population = 100,000 people. Shooters: 100 people Rates: Group A = 10 % shooters Group B = 0.1 % shooters
Admit it, you have always found some excuse to hate America. Now it's Trump. Before that, it was Bush, Cheney, Reagan, the millionaires and billionaires, Wall Street, corporations, traditional families. You always find something good or trivial to justify your innate hatred of our great country.
Those were just a few examples of NON-GANG mass shootings by "transgender" and queer people. If you remove gang shootings, as they are not based on ideology or hatred of a racial or religious group, then the comparative rate of the "transgender" shooters goes way up.
Valuing the individual is value, as prescribed by Christian dogma. There's no contradiction or separation here. No, Islam is not Abrahamic. It is a fake religion that copied Abrahamic religions to gain power. Islam is like the Borg: copy all the technology and none of the substance and soul.
Philemon suggests a more personal approach, urging reconciliation between a slave and master, hinting at equality in Christ (Galatians 3:28). No direct condemnation or endorsement is stated; THE FOCUS IS ON ETHICAL BEHAVIOR within the existing social structure.
The New Testament does not explicitly endorse slavery but reflects its existence in the Greco-Roman world. Passages like Ephesians 6:5-9 and Colossians 3:22-4:1 instruct slaves to obey masters and masters to treat slaves justly, implying acceptance of the institution WITHOUT ADVOCATING for it.
Well, you did start your post with "This is absolute truth". Your lack of precision can be dangerous to society when consumed by weak minds, and there are many of those, and it gives us atheists a bad name. The Christian god, if he exists, loves you no matter what.
We do have lives, fulfilling ones too, and that is why we feel compelled to correct misleading statements that falsely cast shade on good people. As to "character count": See that big plus-sign under each text box? Use it when needed.
No. What is relevant is what is objectively true. We should all strive to approach a MORE true understanding. One highly effective method is by subjecting our views to scrutiny. No, you do not get to decide whether something is "absolutely" true just because you posted it.
What other culture had man being INTRINSICALLY valuable as an individual make is the LIKENESS of god? Not the Hindus. Not the Muslims. Not the Zoroastrians. Not the Buddhists. Not the African tribes. Maybe the Jews, but they are an integral part of Christianity. Jesus was a Jew.
Christians are humans. They call all humans "fallen". As a percentage of their population, I doubt the sexual abuse RATE by priests is higher than many other populations. just look at the transgender people and Muslim immigrants in Europe. Lots of sexual abuse there.
I think you are underestimating the amount of evil that existed without Christianity. Think of e.g. slavery, which was, and still is, prolific throughout the non-Christian world.
I think you might be under-valuing and under-appreciating the medieval times.
No. I meant what I said: "Christian values have played a HUGE ROLE in what makes Western Civilization great, humane, and strong." They compiled many of the existing good ideas and added a bunch of new ones.
Convicted in a show trial on both (very likely false) accusations. Soviet-style evil here.
Even if that's true, it's likely not because they are black but because they are filling roles that are not needed, or they are incompetent (DEI*). The NYT is anti-American propaganda. DEI = Didn't Earn It
No. Books contain ideas that can indoctrinate young people's minds. Guns are used by humans with agency. Books are the best weapons in the world? LOL Say you're a privileged and protected white liberal woman (or cuck) without saying you're a privileged and protected white liberal woman (or cuck).
Books are the best weapons in the world? LOL Say you're a privileged and protected white liberal woman without saying you're a privileged and protected white liberal woman.
Also kein Bier für Linke.
"most"? I doubt that claim is in PROPORTION to their respective populations. It's simple and obvious math. MJ misrepresents the truth to indoctrinate you into hating America and anything that is true and good.
Now do Pete Buttigieg. Also do Joe Biden regarding mental acuity for the most important job in the world. Also do Kamala Harris for the same. For competency, do Alejandro Mayorkas, Rachel Levine and Sam Brinton.
"underappreciated women"? Do you realize that there are billions of men, including hundreds of thousands of male scientists, who are "underappreciated"? Either suck it up, or don't enter the life of vicious competition for survival. RIP Dr. Rossiter, and thank you for telling interesting stories.
No! Intelligent people can identify something harmful to children without analyzing every detail of the thing. Also, we owe you no explanation, let alone a condescending requirement for a "book report". This authoritarian attitude is why Canada continues to descend into totalitarianism.
Where are all the anti-Western immigrants and graffiti "artists" in this picture?
NYT is anti-American propaganda.
Not true, at all. I'm saying this as an atheist: I know many Christians who read the Bible multiple times and who are very devout, rational, and honest. Christian values have played a huge role in what makes Western Civilization great, humane, and strong. Atheists deny this at all our peril.
What about people who take quotes out of context? Nietzsche mourned the loss of the Christian god. What about people who think BlueSky is a place for honest intellectual thought or open mindedness? What about the Communist and atheist societies who have rejected the values of Christianity?
Just wait until the non-western immigrants find this area...